Cargando…

Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas

BACKGROUND: Schizencephaly is an uncommon congenital disorder of cerebral cortical development. The defect is characterized by the presence of a cleft in the brain extending from the surface of the pia mater to the cerebral ventricles. The margins of the cleft are lined with heterotropic, dysplastic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halabuda, Agata, Klasa, Lukasz, Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw, Wyrobek, Lukasz, Milczarek, Olga, Gergont, Aleksandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2638-1
_version_ 1782361452934332416
author Halabuda, Agata
Klasa, Lukasz
Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw
Wyrobek, Lukasz
Milczarek, Olga
Gergont, Aleksandra
author_facet Halabuda, Agata
Klasa, Lukasz
Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw
Wyrobek, Lukasz
Milczarek, Olga
Gergont, Aleksandra
author_sort Halabuda, Agata
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Schizencephaly is an uncommon congenital disorder of cerebral cortical development. The defect is characterized by the presence of a cleft in the brain extending from the surface of the pia mater to the cerebral ventricles. The margins of the cleft are lined with heterotropic, dysplastic gray matter. The causes of schizencephaly are heterogeneous and can include teratogens, prenatal infection, maternal trauma, or EMX2 mutations. METHOD: In the present paper, the authors described difficulties in employing diagnostic imaging in differentiating between type II (open-lip) schizencephaly and much more common intracranial fluid spaces of a different origin (arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus). RESULT: In all the three cases, the treatment consisted in implantation of a shunt system; nevertheless, it should be emphasized that a surgical intervention in the third presented case (type II schizencephaly) aimed at relieving the symptoms of intracranial hypertension—a directly life-threatening condition—since shunting is not a method of treating schizencephaly itself. CONCLUSIONS: Although proper interpretation of the character of intracranial fluid spaces is of significance for further therapeutic management, yet, the key decision as to the surgical intervention is made based on clinical presentation, predominantly on symptoms of intracranial hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4359713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43597132015-03-18 Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas Halabuda, Agata Klasa, Lukasz Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw Wyrobek, Lukasz Milczarek, Olga Gergont, Aleksandra Childs Nerv Syst Original Paper BACKGROUND: Schizencephaly is an uncommon congenital disorder of cerebral cortical development. The defect is characterized by the presence of a cleft in the brain extending from the surface of the pia mater to the cerebral ventricles. The margins of the cleft are lined with heterotropic, dysplastic gray matter. The causes of schizencephaly are heterogeneous and can include teratogens, prenatal infection, maternal trauma, or EMX2 mutations. METHOD: In the present paper, the authors described difficulties in employing diagnostic imaging in differentiating between type II (open-lip) schizencephaly and much more common intracranial fluid spaces of a different origin (arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus). RESULT: In all the three cases, the treatment consisted in implantation of a shunt system; nevertheless, it should be emphasized that a surgical intervention in the third presented case (type II schizencephaly) aimed at relieving the symptoms of intracranial hypertension—a directly life-threatening condition—since shunting is not a method of treating schizencephaly itself. CONCLUSIONS: Although proper interpretation of the character of intracranial fluid spaces is of significance for further therapeutic management, yet, the key decision as to the surgical intervention is made based on clinical presentation, predominantly on symptoms of intracranial hypertension. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-02-18 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4359713/ /pubmed/25690450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2638-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Halabuda, Agata
Klasa, Lukasz
Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw
Wyrobek, Lukasz
Milczarek, Olga
Gergont, Aleksandra
Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas
title Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas
title_full Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas
title_fullStr Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas
title_full_unstemmed Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas
title_short Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas
title_sort schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2638-1
work_keys_str_mv AT halabudaagata schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas
AT klasalukasz schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas
AT kwiatkowskistanislaw schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas
AT wyrobeklukasz schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas
AT milczarekolga schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas
AT gergontaleksandra schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas