Cargando…
Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas
BACKGROUND: Schizencephaly is an uncommon congenital disorder of cerebral cortical development. The defect is characterized by the presence of a cleft in the brain extending from the surface of the pia mater to the cerebral ventricles. The margins of the cleft are lined with heterotropic, dysplastic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2638-1 |
_version_ | 1782361452934332416 |
---|---|
author | Halabuda, Agata Klasa, Lukasz Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw Wyrobek, Lukasz Milczarek, Olga Gergont, Aleksandra |
author_facet | Halabuda, Agata Klasa, Lukasz Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw Wyrobek, Lukasz Milczarek, Olga Gergont, Aleksandra |
author_sort | Halabuda, Agata |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Schizencephaly is an uncommon congenital disorder of cerebral cortical development. The defect is characterized by the presence of a cleft in the brain extending from the surface of the pia mater to the cerebral ventricles. The margins of the cleft are lined with heterotropic, dysplastic gray matter. The causes of schizencephaly are heterogeneous and can include teratogens, prenatal infection, maternal trauma, or EMX2 mutations. METHOD: In the present paper, the authors described difficulties in employing diagnostic imaging in differentiating between type II (open-lip) schizencephaly and much more common intracranial fluid spaces of a different origin (arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus). RESULT: In all the three cases, the treatment consisted in implantation of a shunt system; nevertheless, it should be emphasized that a surgical intervention in the third presented case (type II schizencephaly) aimed at relieving the symptoms of intracranial hypertension—a directly life-threatening condition—since shunting is not a method of treating schizencephaly itself. CONCLUSIONS: Although proper interpretation of the character of intracranial fluid spaces is of significance for further therapeutic management, yet, the key decision as to the surgical intervention is made based on clinical presentation, predominantly on symptoms of intracranial hypertension. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4359713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43597132015-03-18 Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas Halabuda, Agata Klasa, Lukasz Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw Wyrobek, Lukasz Milczarek, Olga Gergont, Aleksandra Childs Nerv Syst Original Paper BACKGROUND: Schizencephaly is an uncommon congenital disorder of cerebral cortical development. The defect is characterized by the presence of a cleft in the brain extending from the surface of the pia mater to the cerebral ventricles. The margins of the cleft are lined with heterotropic, dysplastic gray matter. The causes of schizencephaly are heterogeneous and can include teratogens, prenatal infection, maternal trauma, or EMX2 mutations. METHOD: In the present paper, the authors described difficulties in employing diagnostic imaging in differentiating between type II (open-lip) schizencephaly and much more common intracranial fluid spaces of a different origin (arachnoid cysts and hydrocephalus). RESULT: In all the three cases, the treatment consisted in implantation of a shunt system; nevertheless, it should be emphasized that a surgical intervention in the third presented case (type II schizencephaly) aimed at relieving the symptoms of intracranial hypertension—a directly life-threatening condition—since shunting is not a method of treating schizencephaly itself. CONCLUSIONS: Although proper interpretation of the character of intracranial fluid spaces is of significance for further therapeutic management, yet, the key decision as to the surgical intervention is made based on clinical presentation, predominantly on symptoms of intracranial hypertension. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-02-18 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4359713/ /pubmed/25690450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2638-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Halabuda, Agata Klasa, Lukasz Kwiatkowski, Stanislaw Wyrobek, Lukasz Milczarek, Olga Gergont, Aleksandra Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas |
title | Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas |
title_full | Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas |
title_fullStr | Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas |
title_full_unstemmed | Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas |
title_short | Schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas |
title_sort | schizencephaly—diagnostics and clinical dilemmas |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2638-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halabudaagata schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas AT klasalukasz schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas AT kwiatkowskistanislaw schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas AT wyrobeklukasz schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas AT milczarekolga schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas AT gergontaleksandra schizencephalydiagnosticsandclinicaldilemmas |