Cargando…
Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience
BACKGROUND: Identifying research priorities is key to innovation and economic growth, since it informs decision makers on effectively targeting issues that have the greatest potential public benefit. As such, the process of setting research priorities is of pivotal importance for favouring the scien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0002-2 |
_version_ | 1782361460605714432 |
---|---|
author | de Haan, Sylvia Kingamkono, Rose Tindamanyire, Neema Mshinda, Hassan Makandi, Harun Tibazarwa, Flora Kubata, Bruno Montorzi, Gabriela |
author_facet | de Haan, Sylvia Kingamkono, Rose Tindamanyire, Neema Mshinda, Hassan Makandi, Harun Tibazarwa, Flora Kubata, Bruno Montorzi, Gabriela |
author_sort | de Haan, Sylvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Identifying research priorities is key to innovation and economic growth, since it informs decision makers on effectively targeting issues that have the greatest potential public benefit. As such, the process of setting research priorities is of pivotal importance for favouring the science, technology, and innovation (STI)-driven development of low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We report herein on a major cross-sectoral nationwide research priority setting effort recently carried out in Tanzania by the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) in partnership with the Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED) and the NEPAD Agency. The first of its type in the country, the process brought together stakeholders from 42 sub-sectors in science, technology, and health. The cross-sectoral research priority setting process consisted of a ‘training-of-trainers’ workshop, a demonstration workshop, and seven priority setting workshops delivered to representatives from public and private research and development institutions, universities, non-governmental organizations, and other agencies affiliated to COSTECH. RESULTS: The workshops resulted in ranked listings of research priorities for each sub-sector, totalling approximately 800 priorities. This large number was significantly reduced by an expert panel in order to build a manageable instrument aligned to national development plans that could be used to guide research investments. CONCLUSIONS: The Tanzania experience is an instructive example of the challenges and issues to be faced in when attempting to identify research priority areas and setting an STI research agenda in low- and middle-income countries. As countries increase their investment in research, it is essential to increase investment in research management and governance as well, a key and much needed capacity for countries to make proper use of research investments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0002-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4359761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43597612015-03-16 Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience de Haan, Sylvia Kingamkono, Rose Tindamanyire, Neema Mshinda, Hassan Makandi, Harun Tibazarwa, Flora Kubata, Bruno Montorzi, Gabriela Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Identifying research priorities is key to innovation and economic growth, since it informs decision makers on effectively targeting issues that have the greatest potential public benefit. As such, the process of setting research priorities is of pivotal importance for favouring the science, technology, and innovation (STI)-driven development of low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We report herein on a major cross-sectoral nationwide research priority setting effort recently carried out in Tanzania by the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) in partnership with the Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED) and the NEPAD Agency. The first of its type in the country, the process brought together stakeholders from 42 sub-sectors in science, technology, and health. The cross-sectoral research priority setting process consisted of a ‘training-of-trainers’ workshop, a demonstration workshop, and seven priority setting workshops delivered to representatives from public and private research and development institutions, universities, non-governmental organizations, and other agencies affiliated to COSTECH. RESULTS: The workshops resulted in ranked listings of research priorities for each sub-sector, totalling approximately 800 priorities. This large number was significantly reduced by an expert panel in order to build a manageable instrument aligned to national development plans that could be used to guide research investments. CONCLUSIONS: The Tanzania experience is an instructive example of the challenges and issues to be faced in when attempting to identify research priority areas and setting an STI research agenda in low- and middle-income countries. As countries increase their investment in research, it is essential to increase investment in research management and governance as well, a key and much needed capacity for countries to make proper use of research investments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0002-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4359761/ /pubmed/25890313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0002-2 Text en © de Haan et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research de Haan, Sylvia Kingamkono, Rose Tindamanyire, Neema Mshinda, Hassan Makandi, Harun Tibazarwa, Flora Kubata, Bruno Montorzi, Gabriela Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience |
title | Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience |
title_full | Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience |
title_fullStr | Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience |
title_short | Setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the Tanzania experience |
title_sort | setting research priorities across science, technology, and health sectors: the tanzania experience |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4359761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0002-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehaansylvia settingresearchprioritiesacrosssciencetechnologyandhealthsectorsthetanzaniaexperience AT kingamkonorose settingresearchprioritiesacrosssciencetechnologyandhealthsectorsthetanzaniaexperience AT tindamanyireneema settingresearchprioritiesacrosssciencetechnologyandhealthsectorsthetanzaniaexperience AT mshindahassan settingresearchprioritiesacrosssciencetechnologyandhealthsectorsthetanzaniaexperience AT makandiharun settingresearchprioritiesacrosssciencetechnologyandhealthsectorsthetanzaniaexperience AT tibazarwaflora settingresearchprioritiesacrosssciencetechnologyandhealthsectorsthetanzaniaexperience AT kubatabruno settingresearchprioritiesacrosssciencetechnologyandhealthsectorsthetanzaniaexperience AT montorzigabriela settingresearchprioritiesacrosssciencetechnologyandhealthsectorsthetanzaniaexperience |