Cargando…

Field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the BfArM between 2005 and 2007

The European Directive 98/79/EC for in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD) regulates marketing and post marketing surveillance of IVD in the European Economic Area. Manufacturers have to inform the responsible Competent Authorities (CA) about incidents and field safety corrective actions (FSCA) r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siekmeier, R, Lisson, K, Wetzel, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21147647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-S2-175
_version_ 1782361529611452416
author Siekmeier, R
Lisson, K
Wetzel, D
author_facet Siekmeier, R
Lisson, K
Wetzel, D
author_sort Siekmeier, R
collection PubMed
description The European Directive 98/79/EC for in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD) regulates marketing and post marketing surveillance of IVD in the European Economic Area. Manufacturers have to inform the responsible Competent Authorities (CA) about incidents and field safety corrective actions (FSCA) related to IVD. In Germany, the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) is the responsible CA for most IVD, only few IVD as specified in Annex II of the Directive are under the responsibility of the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI). In case of a FSCA manufacturers have to inform customers by means of a Field Safety Notice (FSN) which should be sent to BfArM prior to release and is published on the BfArM home-page. Between beginning of 2005 and end of 2007 the BfArM received a total of 1025 reports regarding IVD. From these, 38 related to tests, reagents, calibrators, and control materials for infection testing, 13 related to analysers and general consumables (n = 8 and n = 5, respectively) based on culture techniques, and 7 related to analysers and general consumables (n = 5 and n = 2, respectively) based on molecular biological methods. FSCA were performed in Germany in 32 (84.2%) of all notifications related to tests reagents, calibrators, and control materials as well as in 13 (100%) and 7 (100%) of notifications related to analysers and consumables based on culture techniques and molecular biological methods, respectively. A number of relevant deficiencies regarding the quality of the FSN were separately demonstrated for FSN in German and English language. In brief, manufacturers often sent their FSN to the BfArM with delay. Additionally, a subset of FSN provided insufficient information on the product related risks or the measures to be performed by the customer to mitigate product related risks. Furthermore, customer confirmation forms often were missing in the FSN sent to the BfArM. Our data suggest that for IVD for infection testing FSCA and FSN are frequently performed. For better vigilance performance, manufacturers could shorten the time until release and improve the contents of FSN to ensure the safety of IVD in cases of product related corrective actions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4360290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43602902015-03-26 Field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the BfArM between 2005 and 2007 Siekmeier, R Lisson, K Wetzel, D Eur J Med Res Research The European Directive 98/79/EC for in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD) regulates marketing and post marketing surveillance of IVD in the European Economic Area. Manufacturers have to inform the responsible Competent Authorities (CA) about incidents and field safety corrective actions (FSCA) related to IVD. In Germany, the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) is the responsible CA for most IVD, only few IVD as specified in Annex II of the Directive are under the responsibility of the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI). In case of a FSCA manufacturers have to inform customers by means of a Field Safety Notice (FSN) which should be sent to BfArM prior to release and is published on the BfArM home-page. Between beginning of 2005 and end of 2007 the BfArM received a total of 1025 reports regarding IVD. From these, 38 related to tests, reagents, calibrators, and control materials for infection testing, 13 related to analysers and general consumables (n = 8 and n = 5, respectively) based on culture techniques, and 7 related to analysers and general consumables (n = 5 and n = 2, respectively) based on molecular biological methods. FSCA were performed in Germany in 32 (84.2%) of all notifications related to tests reagents, calibrators, and control materials as well as in 13 (100%) and 7 (100%) of notifications related to analysers and consumables based on culture techniques and molecular biological methods, respectively. A number of relevant deficiencies regarding the quality of the FSN were separately demonstrated for FSN in German and English language. In brief, manufacturers often sent their FSN to the BfArM with delay. Additionally, a subset of FSN provided insufficient information on the product related risks or the measures to be performed by the customer to mitigate product related risks. Furthermore, customer confirmation forms often were missing in the FSN sent to the BfArM. Our data suggest that for IVD for infection testing FSCA and FSN are frequently performed. For better vigilance performance, manufacturers could shorten the time until release and improve the contents of FSN to ensure the safety of IVD in cases of product related corrective actions. BioMed Central 2010-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4360290/ /pubmed/21147647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-S2-175 Text en Copyright © 2010 I. Holzapfel Publishers
spellingShingle Research
Siekmeier, R
Lisson, K
Wetzel, D
Field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the BfArM between 2005 and 2007
title Field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the BfArM between 2005 and 2007
title_full Field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the BfArM between 2005 and 2007
title_fullStr Field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the BfArM between 2005 and 2007
title_full_unstemmed Field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the BfArM between 2005 and 2007
title_short Field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the BfArM between 2005 and 2007
title_sort field safety notices released by manufacturers in cases of failure of products for infection testing: analysis of cases reported to the bfarm between 2005 and 2007
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21147647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-S2-175
work_keys_str_mv AT siekmeierr fieldsafetynoticesreleasedbymanufacturersincasesoffailureofproductsforinfectiontestinganalysisofcasesreportedtothebfarmbetween2005and2007
AT lissonk fieldsafetynoticesreleasedbymanufacturersincasesoffailureofproductsforinfectiontestinganalysisofcasesreportedtothebfarmbetween2005and2007
AT wetzeld fieldsafetynoticesreleasedbymanufacturersincasesoffailureofproductsforinfectiontestinganalysisofcasesreportedtothebfarmbetween2005and2007