Cargando…
A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
Jeffrey Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) represents one of the most influential biologically-based personality theories describing individual differences in approach and avoidance tendencies. The most prominent self-report inventory to measure individual differences in approach and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038 |
_version_ | 1782361553097457664 |
---|---|
author | Reuter, Martin Cooper, Andrew J. Smillie, Luke D. Markett, Sebastian Montag, Christian |
author_facet | Reuter, Martin Cooper, Andrew J. Smillie, Luke D. Markett, Sebastian Montag, Christian |
author_sort | Reuter, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Jeffrey Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) represents one of the most influential biologically-based personality theories describing individual differences in approach and avoidance tendencies. The most prominent self-report inventory to measure individual differences in approach and avoidance behavior to date is the BIS/BAS scale by Carver and White (1994). As Gray and McNaughton (2000) revised the RST after its initial formulation in the 1970/80s, and given the Carver and White measure is based on the initial conceptualization of RST, there is a growing need for self-report inventories measuring individual differences in the revised behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral activation system (BAS) and the fight, flight, freezing system (FFFS). Therefore, in this paper we present a new questionnaire measuring individual differences in the revised constructs of the BIS, BAS and FFFS in N = 1814 participants (German sample). An English translated version of the new measure is also presented and tested in N = 299 English language participants. A large number of German participants (N = 1090) also filled in the BIS/BAS scales by Carver and White (1994) and the correlations between these measures are presented. Finally, this same subgroup of participants provided buccal swaps for the investigation of the arginine vasopressin receptor 1a (AVPR1a) gene. Here, a functional genetic polymorphism (rs11174811) on the AVPR1a gene was shown to be associated with individual differences in both the revised BIS and classic BIS dimensions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4360558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43605582015-04-07 A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation Reuter, Martin Cooper, Andrew J. Smillie, Luke D. Markett, Sebastian Montag, Christian Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Jeffrey Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) represents one of the most influential biologically-based personality theories describing individual differences in approach and avoidance tendencies. The most prominent self-report inventory to measure individual differences in approach and avoidance behavior to date is the BIS/BAS scale by Carver and White (1994). As Gray and McNaughton (2000) revised the RST after its initial formulation in the 1970/80s, and given the Carver and White measure is based on the initial conceptualization of RST, there is a growing need for self-report inventories measuring individual differences in the revised behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral activation system (BAS) and the fight, flight, freezing system (FFFS). Therefore, in this paper we present a new questionnaire measuring individual differences in the revised constructs of the BIS, BAS and FFFS in N = 1814 participants (German sample). An English translated version of the new measure is also presented and tested in N = 299 English language participants. A large number of German participants (N = 1090) also filled in the BIS/BAS scales by Carver and White (1994) and the correlations between these measures are presented. Finally, this same subgroup of participants provided buccal swaps for the investigation of the arginine vasopressin receptor 1a (AVPR1a) gene. Here, a functional genetic polymorphism (rs11174811) on the AVPR1a gene was shown to be associated with individual differences in both the revised BIS and classic BIS dimensions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4360558/ /pubmed/25852497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038 Text en Copyright © 2015 Reuter, Cooper, Smillie, Markett and Montag. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Reuter, Martin Cooper, Andrew J. Smillie, Luke D. Markett, Sebastian Montag, Christian A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation |
title | A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation |
title_full | A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation |
title_fullStr | A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation |
title_full_unstemmed | A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation |
title_short | A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation |
title_sort | new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reutermartin anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT cooperandrewj anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT smillieluked anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT markettsebastian anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT montagchristian anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT reutermartin newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT cooperandrewj newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT smillieluked newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT markettsebastian newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation AT montagchristian newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation |