Cargando…

A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation

Jeffrey Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) represents one of the most influential biologically-based personality theories describing individual differences in approach and avoidance tendencies. The most prominent self-report inventory to measure individual differences in approach and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reuter, Martin, Cooper, Andrew J., Smillie, Luke D., Markett, Sebastian, Montag, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038
_version_ 1782361553097457664
author Reuter, Martin
Cooper, Andrew J.
Smillie, Luke D.
Markett, Sebastian
Montag, Christian
author_facet Reuter, Martin
Cooper, Andrew J.
Smillie, Luke D.
Markett, Sebastian
Montag, Christian
author_sort Reuter, Martin
collection PubMed
description Jeffrey Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) represents one of the most influential biologically-based personality theories describing individual differences in approach and avoidance tendencies. The most prominent self-report inventory to measure individual differences in approach and avoidance behavior to date is the BIS/BAS scale by Carver and White (1994). As Gray and McNaughton (2000) revised the RST after its initial formulation in the 1970/80s, and given the Carver and White measure is based on the initial conceptualization of RST, there is a growing need for self-report inventories measuring individual differences in the revised behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral activation system (BAS) and the fight, flight, freezing system (FFFS). Therefore, in this paper we present a new questionnaire measuring individual differences in the revised constructs of the BIS, BAS and FFFS in N = 1814 participants (German sample). An English translated version of the new measure is also presented and tested in N = 299 English language participants. A large number of German participants (N = 1090) also filled in the BIS/BAS scales by Carver and White (1994) and the correlations between these measures are presented. Finally, this same subgroup of participants provided buccal swaps for the investigation of the arginine vasopressin receptor 1a (AVPR1a) gene. Here, a functional genetic polymorphism (rs11174811) on the AVPR1a gene was shown to be associated with individual differences in both the revised BIS and classic BIS dimensions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4360558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43605582015-04-07 A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation Reuter, Martin Cooper, Andrew J. Smillie, Luke D. Markett, Sebastian Montag, Christian Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Jeffrey Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) represents one of the most influential biologically-based personality theories describing individual differences in approach and avoidance tendencies. The most prominent self-report inventory to measure individual differences in approach and avoidance behavior to date is the BIS/BAS scale by Carver and White (1994). As Gray and McNaughton (2000) revised the RST after its initial formulation in the 1970/80s, and given the Carver and White measure is based on the initial conceptualization of RST, there is a growing need for self-report inventories measuring individual differences in the revised behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral activation system (BAS) and the fight, flight, freezing system (FFFS). Therefore, in this paper we present a new questionnaire measuring individual differences in the revised constructs of the BIS, BAS and FFFS in N = 1814 participants (German sample). An English translated version of the new measure is also presented and tested in N = 299 English language participants. A large number of German participants (N = 1090) also filled in the BIS/BAS scales by Carver and White (1994) and the correlations between these measures are presented. Finally, this same subgroup of participants provided buccal swaps for the investigation of the arginine vasopressin receptor 1a (AVPR1a) gene. Here, a functional genetic polymorphism (rs11174811) on the AVPR1a gene was shown to be associated with individual differences in both the revised BIS and classic BIS dimensions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4360558/ /pubmed/25852497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038 Text en Copyright © 2015 Reuter, Cooper, Smillie, Markett and Montag. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Reuter, Martin
Cooper, Andrew J.
Smillie, Luke D.
Markett, Sebastian
Montag, Christian
A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
title A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
title_full A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
title_fullStr A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
title_full_unstemmed A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
title_short A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
title_sort new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038
work_keys_str_mv AT reutermartin anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT cooperandrewj anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT smillieluked anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT markettsebastian anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT montagchristian anewmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT reutermartin newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT cooperandrewj newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT smillieluked newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT markettsebastian newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation
AT montagchristian newmeasurefortherevisedreinforcementsensitivitytheorypsychometriccriteriaandgeneticvalidation