Cargando…

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is a prevalent, underdiagnosed cause of lower back pain. SI joint fusion can relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients who have failed nonoperative care. To date, no study has concurrently compared surgical and non-surgical treatments for chronic SI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whang, Peter, Cher, Daniel, Polly, David, Frank, Clay, Lockstadt, Harry, Glaser, John, Limoni, Robert, Sembrano, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785242
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2006
_version_ 1782361559210655744
author Whang, Peter
Cher, Daniel
Polly, David
Frank, Clay
Lockstadt, Harry
Glaser, John
Limoni, Robert
Sembrano, Jonathan
author_facet Whang, Peter
Cher, Daniel
Polly, David
Frank, Clay
Lockstadt, Harry
Glaser, John
Limoni, Robert
Sembrano, Jonathan
author_sort Whang, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is a prevalent, underdiagnosed cause of lower back pain. SI joint fusion can relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients who have failed nonoperative care. To date, no study has concurrently compared surgical and non-surgical treatments for chronic SI joint dysfunction. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of 148 subjects with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or sacroiliac joint disruptions who were assigned to either minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants (N=102) or non-surgical management (NSM, n=46). SI joint pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) were collected at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment commencement. Six-month success rates, defined as the proportion of treated subjects with a 20-mm improvement in SI joint pain in the absence of severe device-related or neurologic SI joint-related adverse events or surgical revision, were compared using Bayesian methods. RESULTS: Subjects (mean age 51, 70% women) were highly debilitated at baseline (mean SI joint VAS pain score 82, mean ODI score 62). Six-month follow-up was obtained in 97.3%. By 6 months, success rates were 81.4% in the surgical group vs. 23.9% in the NSM group (difference of 56.6%, 95% posterior credible interval 41.4-70.0%, posterior probability of superiority >0.999). Clinically important (≥15 point) ODI improvement at 6 months occurred in 75% of surgery subjects vs. 27.3% of NSM subjects. At six months, quality of life improved more in the surgery group and satisfaction rates were high. The mean number of adverse events in the first six months was slightly higher in the surgical group compared to the non-surgical group (1.3 vs. 1.0 events per subject, p=0.1857). CONCLUSIONS: Six-month follow-up from this level 1 study showed that minimally invasive SI joint fusion using triangular titanium implants was more effective than non-surgical management in relieving pain, improving function and improving quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or SI joint disruptions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion is an acceptable option for patients with chronic SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruptions unresponsive to non-surgical treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4360612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43606122015-03-17 Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Whang, Peter Cher, Daniel Polly, David Frank, Clay Lockstadt, Harry Glaser, John Limoni, Robert Sembrano, Jonathan Int J Spine Surg Article BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is a prevalent, underdiagnosed cause of lower back pain. SI joint fusion can relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients who have failed nonoperative care. To date, no study has concurrently compared surgical and non-surgical treatments for chronic SI joint dysfunction. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of 148 subjects with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or sacroiliac joint disruptions who were assigned to either minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants (N=102) or non-surgical management (NSM, n=46). SI joint pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) were collected at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment commencement. Six-month success rates, defined as the proportion of treated subjects with a 20-mm improvement in SI joint pain in the absence of severe device-related or neurologic SI joint-related adverse events or surgical revision, were compared using Bayesian methods. RESULTS: Subjects (mean age 51, 70% women) were highly debilitated at baseline (mean SI joint VAS pain score 82, mean ODI score 62). Six-month follow-up was obtained in 97.3%. By 6 months, success rates were 81.4% in the surgical group vs. 23.9% in the NSM group (difference of 56.6%, 95% posterior credible interval 41.4-70.0%, posterior probability of superiority >0.999). Clinically important (≥15 point) ODI improvement at 6 months occurred in 75% of surgery subjects vs. 27.3% of NSM subjects. At six months, quality of life improved more in the surgery group and satisfaction rates were high. The mean number of adverse events in the first six months was slightly higher in the surgical group compared to the non-surgical group (1.3 vs. 1.0 events per subject, p=0.1857). CONCLUSIONS: Six-month follow-up from this level 1 study showed that minimally invasive SI joint fusion using triangular titanium implants was more effective than non-surgical management in relieving pain, improving function and improving quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or SI joint disruptions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion is an acceptable option for patients with chronic SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruptions unresponsive to non-surgical treatments. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2015-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4360612/ /pubmed/25785242 http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2006 Text en Copyright © 2015 ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Copyright © 2015 ISASS.
spellingShingle Article
Whang, Peter
Cher, Daniel
Polly, David
Frank, Clay
Lockstadt, Harry
Glaser, John
Limoni, Robert
Sembrano, Jonathan
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants vs. non-surgical management: six-month outcomes from a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785242
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/2006
work_keys_str_mv AT whangpeter sacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplantsvsnonsurgicalmanagementsixmonthoutcomesfromaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cherdaniel sacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplantsvsnonsurgicalmanagementsixmonthoutcomesfromaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pollydavid sacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplantsvsnonsurgicalmanagementsixmonthoutcomesfromaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT frankclay sacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplantsvsnonsurgicalmanagementsixmonthoutcomesfromaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lockstadtharry sacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplantsvsnonsurgicalmanagementsixmonthoutcomesfromaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT glaserjohn sacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplantsvsnonsurgicalmanagementsixmonthoutcomesfromaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT limonirobert sacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplantsvsnonsurgicalmanagementsixmonthoutcomesfromaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sembranojonathan sacroiliacjointfusionusingtriangulartitaniumimplantsvsnonsurgicalmanagementsixmonthoutcomesfromaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial