Cargando…

Is IORT ready for roll-out?

Two large randomised controlled trials of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in breast-conserving surgery (TARGIT-A and ELIOT) have been published 14 years after their launch. Neither the TARGIT-A trial nor the ELIOT trial results have changed the current clinical practice for the use of IORT. The i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esposito, Emanuela, Anninga, Bauke, Honey, Ian, Ross, Gillian, Rainsbury, Dick, Laws, Siobhan, Rinsma, Sygriet, Douek, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2015.516
_version_ 1782361559667834880
author Esposito, Emanuela
Anninga, Bauke
Honey, Ian
Ross, Gillian
Rainsbury, Dick
Laws, Siobhan
Rinsma, Sygriet
Douek, Michael
author_facet Esposito, Emanuela
Anninga, Bauke
Honey, Ian
Ross, Gillian
Rainsbury, Dick
Laws, Siobhan
Rinsma, Sygriet
Douek, Michael
author_sort Esposito, Emanuela
collection PubMed
description Two large randomised controlled trials of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in breast-conserving surgery (TARGIT-A and ELIOT) have been published 14 years after their launch. Neither the TARGIT-A trial nor the ELIOT trial results have changed the current clinical practice for the use of IORT. The in-breast local recurrence rate (LRR) after IORT met the pre-specified non-inferiority margins in both trials and was 3.3% in TARGIT-A and 4.4% in the ELIOT trial. In both trials, the pre-specified estimates for local recurrence (LR) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) significantly overestimated actual LRR. In the TARGIT-A trial, LR with EBRT was estimated at the outset to be 6%, and in the ELIOT trial, it was estimated to be 3%. Surprisingly, LRR in the EBRT groups has been found to be significantly lower, 1.3% in the EBRT arm of the TARGIT-A and 0.4% in the EBRT arm of the ELIOT trial, respectively. Median follow-up was 2.4 years for the TARGIT-A trial and 5.8 years for the ELIOT trial. However, the initial cohort of patients in the TARGIT-A trial (reported in 2010) now have a median follow-up of 3.8 years and data on LR were available at 5 years follow-up on 35% of patients (18% who received IORT). Although further follow-up will increase confidence with the data, it will also further delay clinical implementation. By carefully weighing the risks and benefits of a single-fraction radiation treatment with patients, IORT should be offered within agreed and strict protocols. Patients deemed at low risk of LR or those deemed suitable for partial breast irradiation, according to the GEC-ESTRO and ASTRO recommendations, could be considered as candidates for IORT. These guidelines apply to all partial breast irradiation techniques, and more specific guidelines for IORT would assist clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4360616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43606162015-03-19 Is IORT ready for roll-out? Esposito, Emanuela Anninga, Bauke Honey, Ian Ross, Gillian Rainsbury, Dick Laws, Siobhan Rinsma, Sygriet Douek, Michael Ecancermedicalscience Review Two large randomised controlled trials of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in breast-conserving surgery (TARGIT-A and ELIOT) have been published 14 years after their launch. Neither the TARGIT-A trial nor the ELIOT trial results have changed the current clinical practice for the use of IORT. The in-breast local recurrence rate (LRR) after IORT met the pre-specified non-inferiority margins in both trials and was 3.3% in TARGIT-A and 4.4% in the ELIOT trial. In both trials, the pre-specified estimates for local recurrence (LR) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) significantly overestimated actual LRR. In the TARGIT-A trial, LR with EBRT was estimated at the outset to be 6%, and in the ELIOT trial, it was estimated to be 3%. Surprisingly, LRR in the EBRT groups has been found to be significantly lower, 1.3% in the EBRT arm of the TARGIT-A and 0.4% in the EBRT arm of the ELIOT trial, respectively. Median follow-up was 2.4 years for the TARGIT-A trial and 5.8 years for the ELIOT trial. However, the initial cohort of patients in the TARGIT-A trial (reported in 2010) now have a median follow-up of 3.8 years and data on LR were available at 5 years follow-up on 35% of patients (18% who received IORT). Although further follow-up will increase confidence with the data, it will also further delay clinical implementation. By carefully weighing the risks and benefits of a single-fraction radiation treatment with patients, IORT should be offered within agreed and strict protocols. Patients deemed at low risk of LR or those deemed suitable for partial breast irradiation, according to the GEC-ESTRO and ASTRO recommendations, could be considered as candidates for IORT. These guidelines apply to all partial breast irradiation techniques, and more specific guidelines for IORT would assist clinicians. Cancer Intelligence 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4360616/ /pubmed/25793013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2015.516 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Esposito, Emanuela
Anninga, Bauke
Honey, Ian
Ross, Gillian
Rainsbury, Dick
Laws, Siobhan
Rinsma, Sygriet
Douek, Michael
Is IORT ready for roll-out?
title Is IORT ready for roll-out?
title_full Is IORT ready for roll-out?
title_fullStr Is IORT ready for roll-out?
title_full_unstemmed Is IORT ready for roll-out?
title_short Is IORT ready for roll-out?
title_sort is iort ready for roll-out?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793013
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2015.516
work_keys_str_mv AT espositoemanuela isiortreadyforrollout
AT anningabauke isiortreadyforrollout
AT honeyian isiortreadyforrollout
AT rossgillian isiortreadyforrollout
AT rainsburydick isiortreadyforrollout
AT lawssiobhan isiortreadyforrollout
AT rinsmasygriet isiortreadyforrollout
AT douekmichael isiortreadyforrollout