Cargando…
Is IORT ready for roll-out?
Two large randomised controlled trials of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in breast-conserving surgery (TARGIT-A and ELIOT) have been published 14 years after their launch. Neither the TARGIT-A trial nor the ELIOT trial results have changed the current clinical practice for the use of IORT. The i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2015.516 |
_version_ | 1782361559667834880 |
---|---|
author | Esposito, Emanuela Anninga, Bauke Honey, Ian Ross, Gillian Rainsbury, Dick Laws, Siobhan Rinsma, Sygriet Douek, Michael |
author_facet | Esposito, Emanuela Anninga, Bauke Honey, Ian Ross, Gillian Rainsbury, Dick Laws, Siobhan Rinsma, Sygriet Douek, Michael |
author_sort | Esposito, Emanuela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two large randomised controlled trials of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in breast-conserving surgery (TARGIT-A and ELIOT) have been published 14 years after their launch. Neither the TARGIT-A trial nor the ELIOT trial results have changed the current clinical practice for the use of IORT. The in-breast local recurrence rate (LRR) after IORT met the pre-specified non-inferiority margins in both trials and was 3.3% in TARGIT-A and 4.4% in the ELIOT trial. In both trials, the pre-specified estimates for local recurrence (LR) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) significantly overestimated actual LRR. In the TARGIT-A trial, LR with EBRT was estimated at the outset to be 6%, and in the ELIOT trial, it was estimated to be 3%. Surprisingly, LRR in the EBRT groups has been found to be significantly lower, 1.3% in the EBRT arm of the TARGIT-A and 0.4% in the EBRT arm of the ELIOT trial, respectively. Median follow-up was 2.4 years for the TARGIT-A trial and 5.8 years for the ELIOT trial. However, the initial cohort of patients in the TARGIT-A trial (reported in 2010) now have a median follow-up of 3.8 years and data on LR were available at 5 years follow-up on 35% of patients (18% who received IORT). Although further follow-up will increase confidence with the data, it will also further delay clinical implementation. By carefully weighing the risks and benefits of a single-fraction radiation treatment with patients, IORT should be offered within agreed and strict protocols. Patients deemed at low risk of LR or those deemed suitable for partial breast irradiation, according to the GEC-ESTRO and ASTRO recommendations, could be considered as candidates for IORT. These guidelines apply to all partial breast irradiation techniques, and more specific guidelines for IORT would assist clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4360616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43606162015-03-19 Is IORT ready for roll-out? Esposito, Emanuela Anninga, Bauke Honey, Ian Ross, Gillian Rainsbury, Dick Laws, Siobhan Rinsma, Sygriet Douek, Michael Ecancermedicalscience Review Two large randomised controlled trials of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in breast-conserving surgery (TARGIT-A and ELIOT) have been published 14 years after their launch. Neither the TARGIT-A trial nor the ELIOT trial results have changed the current clinical practice for the use of IORT. The in-breast local recurrence rate (LRR) after IORT met the pre-specified non-inferiority margins in both trials and was 3.3% in TARGIT-A and 4.4% in the ELIOT trial. In both trials, the pre-specified estimates for local recurrence (LR) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) significantly overestimated actual LRR. In the TARGIT-A trial, LR with EBRT was estimated at the outset to be 6%, and in the ELIOT trial, it was estimated to be 3%. Surprisingly, LRR in the EBRT groups has been found to be significantly lower, 1.3% in the EBRT arm of the TARGIT-A and 0.4% in the EBRT arm of the ELIOT trial, respectively. Median follow-up was 2.4 years for the TARGIT-A trial and 5.8 years for the ELIOT trial. However, the initial cohort of patients in the TARGIT-A trial (reported in 2010) now have a median follow-up of 3.8 years and data on LR were available at 5 years follow-up on 35% of patients (18% who received IORT). Although further follow-up will increase confidence with the data, it will also further delay clinical implementation. By carefully weighing the risks and benefits of a single-fraction radiation treatment with patients, IORT should be offered within agreed and strict protocols. Patients deemed at low risk of LR or those deemed suitable for partial breast irradiation, according to the GEC-ESTRO and ASTRO recommendations, could be considered as candidates for IORT. These guidelines apply to all partial breast irradiation techniques, and more specific guidelines for IORT would assist clinicians. Cancer Intelligence 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4360616/ /pubmed/25793013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2015.516 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Esposito, Emanuela Anninga, Bauke Honey, Ian Ross, Gillian Rainsbury, Dick Laws, Siobhan Rinsma, Sygriet Douek, Michael Is IORT ready for roll-out? |
title | Is IORT ready for roll-out? |
title_full | Is IORT ready for roll-out? |
title_fullStr | Is IORT ready for roll-out? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is IORT ready for roll-out? |
title_short | Is IORT ready for roll-out? |
title_sort | is iort ready for roll-out? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793013 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2015.516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT espositoemanuela isiortreadyforrollout AT anningabauke isiortreadyforrollout AT honeyian isiortreadyforrollout AT rossgillian isiortreadyforrollout AT rainsburydick isiortreadyforrollout AT lawssiobhan isiortreadyforrollout AT rinsmasygriet isiortreadyforrollout AT douekmichael isiortreadyforrollout |