Cargando…

Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the validity of using respondents’ reports of age disparity in their sexual relationships (perceived disparity), compared to age disparity based on each partner's report of their own date of birth (actual disparity). SETTING: The study was conducted using data f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harling, Guy, Tanser, Frank, Mutevedzi, Tinofa, Bärnighausen, Till
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25748414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005638
_version_ 1782361581910228992
author Harling, Guy
Tanser, Frank
Mutevedzi, Tinofa
Bärnighausen, Till
author_facet Harling, Guy
Tanser, Frank
Mutevedzi, Tinofa
Bärnighausen, Till
author_sort Harling, Guy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the validity of using respondents’ reports of age disparity in their sexual relationships (perceived disparity), compared to age disparity based on each partner's report of their own date of birth (actual disparity). SETTING: The study was conducted using data from a longitudinal population-based cohort in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, between 2005 and 2012. PARTICIPANTS: The study used 13 831 reports of partner age disparity within 7337 unique conjugal relationships. 10 012 (72.4%) reports were made by women. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Lin concordance correlation of perceived and actual age disparities. Secondary outcomes included the sensitivity/specificity of perceived disparities to assess whether the man in the relationship was more than five or more than 10 years older than the woman. RESULTS: Mean relationship age disparity was 6 years. On average, respondents slightly underestimated their partners’ ages (male respondents: 0.50 years; female respondents: 0.85 years). Almost three-quarters (72.3%) of age disparity estimates fell within 2 years of the true values, although a small minority of reports were far from correct. The Lin concordance correlation of perceived and actual age disparities (men: ρ=0.61; women: ρ=0.78), and assessments of whether the man in the relationship was more than five, or more than 10 years older than the woman (sensitivity >60%; specificity >75%), were relatively high. Accuracy was higher for spouses and people living in the same household, but was not affected by relationship duration. CONCLUSIONS: Rural South Africans reported their sexual partners’ ages imperfectly, but with less error than in some other African settings. Further research is required to determine how generalisable these findings are. Self-reported data on age disparity in sexual relationships can be used with caution for research, intervention design, and targeting in this and similar settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4360781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43607812015-03-25 Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort Harling, Guy Tanser, Frank Mutevedzi, Tinofa Bärnighausen, Till BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the validity of using respondents’ reports of age disparity in their sexual relationships (perceived disparity), compared to age disparity based on each partner's report of their own date of birth (actual disparity). SETTING: The study was conducted using data from a longitudinal population-based cohort in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, between 2005 and 2012. PARTICIPANTS: The study used 13 831 reports of partner age disparity within 7337 unique conjugal relationships. 10 012 (72.4%) reports were made by women. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the Lin concordance correlation of perceived and actual age disparities. Secondary outcomes included the sensitivity/specificity of perceived disparities to assess whether the man in the relationship was more than five or more than 10 years older than the woman. RESULTS: Mean relationship age disparity was 6 years. On average, respondents slightly underestimated their partners’ ages (male respondents: 0.50 years; female respondents: 0.85 years). Almost three-quarters (72.3%) of age disparity estimates fell within 2 years of the true values, although a small minority of reports were far from correct. The Lin concordance correlation of perceived and actual age disparities (men: ρ=0.61; women: ρ=0.78), and assessments of whether the man in the relationship was more than five, or more than 10 years older than the woman (sensitivity >60%; specificity >75%), were relatively high. Accuracy was higher for spouses and people living in the same household, but was not affected by relationship duration. CONCLUSIONS: Rural South Africans reported their sexual partners’ ages imperfectly, but with less error than in some other African settings. Further research is required to determine how generalisable these findings are. Self-reported data on age disparity in sexual relationships can be used with caution for research, intervention design, and targeting in this and similar settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4360781/ /pubmed/25748414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005638 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Harling, Guy
Tanser, Frank
Mutevedzi, Tinofa
Bärnighausen, Till
Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort
title Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort
title_full Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort
title_fullStr Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort
title_short Assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural South African population-based cohort
title_sort assessing the validity of respondents’ reports of their partners’ ages in a rural south african population-based cohort
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25748414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005638
work_keys_str_mv AT harlingguy assessingthevalidityofrespondentsreportsoftheirpartnersagesinaruralsouthafricanpopulationbasedcohort
AT tanserfrank assessingthevalidityofrespondentsreportsoftheirpartnersagesinaruralsouthafricanpopulationbasedcohort
AT mutevedzitinofa assessingthevalidityofrespondentsreportsoftheirpartnersagesinaruralsouthafricanpopulationbasedcohort
AT barnighausentill assessingthevalidityofrespondentsreportsoftheirpartnersagesinaruralsouthafricanpopulationbasedcohort