Cargando…

Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial

INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of new antibiotics such as daptomycin, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia continues to be associated with high clinical failure rates. Combination therapy has been proposed as an alternative to improve outcomes but there is a lack of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, E, Miró, J M, Puig-Asensio, M, Pigrau, C, Barcenilla, F, Murillas, J, Garcia-Pardo, G, Espejo, E, Padilla, B, Garcia-Reyne, A, Pasquau, J, Rodriguez-Baño, J, López-Contreras, J, Montero, M, de la Calle, C, Pintado, V, Calbo, E, Gasch, O, Montejo, M, Salavert, M, Garcia-Pais, M J, Carratalà, J, Pujol, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006723
_version_ 1782361582604386304
author Shaw, E
Miró, J M
Puig-Asensio, M
Pigrau, C
Barcenilla, F
Murillas, J
Garcia-Pardo, G
Espejo, E
Padilla, B
Garcia-Reyne, A
Pasquau, J
Rodriguez-Baño, J
López-Contreras, J
Montero, M
de la Calle, C
Pintado, V
Calbo, E
Gasch, O
Montejo, M
Salavert, M
Garcia-Pais, M J
Carratalà, J
Pujol, M
author_facet Shaw, E
Miró, J M
Puig-Asensio, M
Pigrau, C
Barcenilla, F
Murillas, J
Garcia-Pardo, G
Espejo, E
Padilla, B
Garcia-Reyne, A
Pasquau, J
Rodriguez-Baño, J
López-Contreras, J
Montero, M
de la Calle, C
Pintado, V
Calbo, E
Gasch, O
Montejo, M
Salavert, M
Garcia-Pais, M J
Carratalà, J
Pujol, M
author_sort Shaw, E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of new antibiotics such as daptomycin, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia continues to be associated with high clinical failure rates. Combination therapy has been proposed as an alternative to improve outcomes but there is a lack of clinical studies. The study aims to demonstrate that combination of daptomycin plus fosfomycin achieves higher clinical success rates in the treatment of MRSA bacteraemia than daptomycin alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre open-label, randomised phase III study. Adult patients hospitalised with MRSA bacteraemia will be randomly assigned (1:1) to group 1: daptomycin 10 mg/kg/24 h intravenous; or group 2: daptomycin 10 mg/kg/24 h intravenous plus fosfomycin 2 gr/6 g intravenous. The main outcome will be treatment response at week 6 after stopping therapy (test-of-cure (TOC) visit). This is a composite variable with two values: Treatment success: resolution of clinical signs and symptoms (clinical success) and negative blood cultures (microbiological success) at the TOC visit. Treatment failure: if any of the following conditions apply: (1) lack of clinical improvement at 72 h or more after starting therapy; (2) persistent bacteraemia (positive blood cultures on day 7); (3) therapy is discontinued early due to adverse effects or for some other reason based on clinical judgement; (4) relapse of MRSA bacteraemia before the TOC visit; (5) death for any reason before the TOC visit. Assuming a 60% cure rate with daptomycin and a 20% difference in cure rates between the two groups, 103 patients will be needed for each group (α:0.05, ß: 0.2). Statistical analysis will be based on intention to treat, as well as per protocol and safety analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Spanish Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (AEMPS). The sponsor commits itself to publishing the data in first quartile peer-review journals within 12 months of the completion of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01898338.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4360784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43607842015-03-25 Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial Shaw, E Miró, J M Puig-Asensio, M Pigrau, C Barcenilla, F Murillas, J Garcia-Pardo, G Espejo, E Padilla, B Garcia-Reyne, A Pasquau, J Rodriguez-Baño, J López-Contreras, J Montero, M de la Calle, C Pintado, V Calbo, E Gasch, O Montejo, M Salavert, M Garcia-Pais, M J Carratalà, J Pujol, M BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of new antibiotics such as daptomycin, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia continues to be associated with high clinical failure rates. Combination therapy has been proposed as an alternative to improve outcomes but there is a lack of clinical studies. The study aims to demonstrate that combination of daptomycin plus fosfomycin achieves higher clinical success rates in the treatment of MRSA bacteraemia than daptomycin alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre open-label, randomised phase III study. Adult patients hospitalised with MRSA bacteraemia will be randomly assigned (1:1) to group 1: daptomycin 10 mg/kg/24 h intravenous; or group 2: daptomycin 10 mg/kg/24 h intravenous plus fosfomycin 2 gr/6 g intravenous. The main outcome will be treatment response at week 6 after stopping therapy (test-of-cure (TOC) visit). This is a composite variable with two values: Treatment success: resolution of clinical signs and symptoms (clinical success) and negative blood cultures (microbiological success) at the TOC visit. Treatment failure: if any of the following conditions apply: (1) lack of clinical improvement at 72 h or more after starting therapy; (2) persistent bacteraemia (positive blood cultures on day 7); (3) therapy is discontinued early due to adverse effects or for some other reason based on clinical judgement; (4) relapse of MRSA bacteraemia before the TOC visit; (5) death for any reason before the TOC visit. Assuming a 60% cure rate with daptomycin and a 20% difference in cure rates between the two groups, 103 patients will be needed for each group (α:0.05, ß: 0.2). Statistical analysis will be based on intention to treat, as well as per protocol and safety analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Spanish Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (AEMPS). The sponsor commits itself to publishing the data in first quartile peer-review journals within 12 months of the completion of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01898338. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4360784/ /pubmed/25762232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006723 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Shaw, E
Miró, J M
Puig-Asensio, M
Pigrau, C
Barcenilla, F
Murillas, J
Garcia-Pardo, G
Espejo, E
Padilla, B
Garcia-Reyne, A
Pasquau, J
Rodriguez-Baño, J
López-Contreras, J
Montero, M
de la Calle, C
Pintado, V
Calbo, E
Gasch, O
Montejo, M
Salavert, M
Garcia-Pais, M J
Carratalà, J
Pujol, M
Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial
title Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial
title_full Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial
title_fullStr Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial
title_full_unstemmed Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial
title_short Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial
title_sort daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating mrsa: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase iii trial
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006723
work_keys_str_mv AT shawe daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT mirojm daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT puigasensiom daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT pigrauc daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT barcenillaf daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT murillasj daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT garciapardog daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT espejoe daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT padillab daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT garciareynea daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT pasquauj daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT rodriguezbanoj daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT lopezcontrerasj daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT monterom daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT delacallec daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT pintadov daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT calboe daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT gascho daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT montejom daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT salavertm daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT garciapaismj daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT carratalaj daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial
AT pujolm daptomycinplusfosfomycinversusdaptomycinmonotherapyintreatingmrsaprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedphaseiiitrial