Cargando…

The early plasma concentration of (51)Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine which of three two-parameter fitting functions (exponential, linear-log, and negative-power function of time) most accurately models early chromium-51-EDTA ((51)Cr-EDTA) plasma concentration data prior to 120 min in patients with cirrhosis and ascite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wanasundara, Surajith N., Wesolowski, Michal J., Puetter, Richard C., Burniston, Maria T., Xirouchakis, Elias, Giamalis, Ioannis G., Babyn, Paul S., Wesolowski, Carl A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25564070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000255
_version_ 1782361588724924416
author Wanasundara, Surajith N.
Wesolowski, Michal J.
Puetter, Richard C.
Burniston, Maria T.
Xirouchakis, Elias
Giamalis, Ioannis G.
Babyn, Paul S.
Wesolowski, Carl A.
author_facet Wanasundara, Surajith N.
Wesolowski, Michal J.
Puetter, Richard C.
Burniston, Maria T.
Xirouchakis, Elias
Giamalis, Ioannis G.
Babyn, Paul S.
Wesolowski, Carl A.
author_sort Wanasundara, Surajith N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine which of three two-parameter fitting functions (exponential, linear-log, and negative-power function of time) most accurately models early chromium-51-EDTA ((51)Cr-EDTA) plasma concentration data prior to 120 min in patients with cirrhosis and ascites and understand how these fitting functions affect the calculation of the area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC). METHODS: A bolus, antecubital intravenous injection of 2.6 MBq of (51)Cr-EDTA was given to 13 patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Up to 16 blood samples were drawn at time points ranging from 5 to 1440 min following injection. The concentration data prior to 120 min were used as reference data. Early time concentration values, estimated by fitting exponential, linear-log, and negative-power functions of time to the time samples at 120, 180, and 240 min, were then compared with reference data. The AUC was calculated for each patient using the exponential, Bröchner-Mortensen-corrected exponential, and linear-log functions, and these values were compared. RESULTS: The withheld, observed plasma concentrations were (a) most accurately estimated by linear-log functions (Wilcoxon P=0.4548), (b) significantly underestimated by exponential functions (Wilcoxon P=0.0002), and (c) significantly overestimated by negative-power functions (Wilcoxon P=0.0034). The relative errors when ranked from best to worst were those for the linear-log (12.0%, 9.0%), exponential (22.9%, 14.2%), and negative-power (31.9%, 48.4%) functions of time, respectively (median, interquartile range). For each patient, the values for AUC calculated by the exponential function differed significantly (range=3.4–15.3%, median=8.3%) from those calculated by the corrected Bröchner-Mortensen exponential, as to a lesser extent did those values calculated using linear-log functions (range=0.4–8.0%, median=3.0%). CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis, linear-log functions were significantly more accurate than exponential or power functions in estimating early time plasma concentrations (<120 min). However, the improved linear-log early time plasma concentration model does not provide as much correction to the total AUC as does the corrected Bröchner-Mortensen exponential method. This is likely because of the large contribution of late time data to the AUC, and future work is suggested to explore the late time fit problem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4360810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43608102015-03-30 The early plasma concentration of (51)Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models Wanasundara, Surajith N. Wesolowski, Michal J. Puetter, Richard C. Burniston, Maria T. Xirouchakis, Elias Giamalis, Ioannis G. Babyn, Paul S. Wesolowski, Carl A. Nucl Med Commun Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine which of three two-parameter fitting functions (exponential, linear-log, and negative-power function of time) most accurately models early chromium-51-EDTA ((51)Cr-EDTA) plasma concentration data prior to 120 min in patients with cirrhosis and ascites and understand how these fitting functions affect the calculation of the area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC). METHODS: A bolus, antecubital intravenous injection of 2.6 MBq of (51)Cr-EDTA was given to 13 patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Up to 16 blood samples were drawn at time points ranging from 5 to 1440 min following injection. The concentration data prior to 120 min were used as reference data. Early time concentration values, estimated by fitting exponential, linear-log, and negative-power functions of time to the time samples at 120, 180, and 240 min, were then compared with reference data. The AUC was calculated for each patient using the exponential, Bröchner-Mortensen-corrected exponential, and linear-log functions, and these values were compared. RESULTS: The withheld, observed plasma concentrations were (a) most accurately estimated by linear-log functions (Wilcoxon P=0.4548), (b) significantly underestimated by exponential functions (Wilcoxon P=0.0002), and (c) significantly overestimated by negative-power functions (Wilcoxon P=0.0034). The relative errors when ranked from best to worst were those for the linear-log (12.0%, 9.0%), exponential (22.9%, 14.2%), and negative-power (31.9%, 48.4%) functions of time, respectively (median, interquartile range). For each patient, the values for AUC calculated by the exponential function differed significantly (range=3.4–15.3%, median=8.3%) from those calculated by the corrected Bröchner-Mortensen exponential, as to a lesser extent did those values calculated using linear-log functions (range=0.4–8.0%, median=3.0%). CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis, linear-log functions were significantly more accurate than exponential or power functions in estimating early time plasma concentrations (<120 min). However, the improved linear-log early time plasma concentration model does not provide as much correction to the total AUC as does the corrected Bröchner-Mortensen exponential method. This is likely because of the large contribution of late time data to the AUC, and future work is suggested to explore the late time fit problem. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-04 2015-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4360810/ /pubmed/25564070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000255 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wanasundara, Surajith N.
Wesolowski, Michal J.
Puetter, Richard C.
Burniston, Maria T.
Xirouchakis, Elias
Giamalis, Ioannis G.
Babyn, Paul S.
Wesolowski, Carl A.
The early plasma concentration of (51)Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models
title The early plasma concentration of (51)Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models
title_full The early plasma concentration of (51)Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models
title_fullStr The early plasma concentration of (51)Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models
title_full_unstemmed The early plasma concentration of (51)Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models
title_short The early plasma concentration of (51)Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models
title_sort early plasma concentration of (51)cr-edta in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4360810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25564070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000255
work_keys_str_mv AT wanasundarasurajithn theearlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT wesolowskimichalj theearlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT puetterrichardc theearlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT burnistonmariat theearlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT xirouchakiselias theearlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT giamalisioannisg theearlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT babynpauls theearlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT wesolowskicarla theearlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT wanasundarasurajithn earlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT wesolowskimichalj earlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT puetterrichardc earlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT burnistonmariat earlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT xirouchakiselias earlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT giamalisioannisg earlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT babynpauls earlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels
AT wesolowskicarla earlyplasmaconcentrationof51credtainpatientswithcirrhosisandascitesacomparisonofthreemodels