Cargando…
Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This accoun...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4361726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25743058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0026-y |
_version_ | 1782361694875418624 |
---|---|
author | Evans, Nicholas G. |
author_facet | Evans, Nicholas G. |
author_sort | Evans, Nicholas G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This account, however, neglects important social aspects of the use of science and technology. In this paper, I supplement existing conceptions of dual-use potential to account for the social context of dual-use research. This account incorporates relational and positional concerns that feature in the success or failure of dual-use. I then defend this account against foreseeable objections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4361726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43617262015-03-20 Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues Evans, Nicholas G. Monash Bioeth Rev Original Article Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This account, however, neglects important social aspects of the use of science and technology. In this paper, I supplement existing conceptions of dual-use potential to account for the social context of dual-use research. This account incorporates relational and positional concerns that feature in the success or failure of dual-use. I then defend this account against foreseeable objections. Springer International Publishing 2015-03-03 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4361726/ /pubmed/25743058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0026-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Evans, Nicholas G. Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues |
title | Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues |
title_full | Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues |
title_fullStr | Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues |
title_full_unstemmed | Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues |
title_short | Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues |
title_sort | dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4361726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25743058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0026-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evansnicholasg dualusedecisionmakingrelationalandpositionalissues |