Cargando…

Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues

Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This accoun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Evans, Nicholas G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4361726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25743058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0026-y
_version_ 1782361694875418624
author Evans, Nicholas G.
author_facet Evans, Nicholas G.
author_sort Evans, Nicholas G.
collection PubMed
description Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This account, however, neglects important social aspects of the use of science and technology. In this paper, I supplement existing conceptions of dual-use potential to account for the social context of dual-use research. This account incorporates relational and positional concerns that feature in the success or failure of dual-use. I then defend this account against foreseeable objections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4361726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43617262015-03-20 Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues Evans, Nicholas G. Monash Bioeth Rev Original Article Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This account, however, neglects important social aspects of the use of science and technology. In this paper, I supplement existing conceptions of dual-use potential to account for the social context of dual-use research. This account incorporates relational and positional concerns that feature in the success or failure of dual-use. I then defend this account against foreseeable objections. Springer International Publishing 2015-03-03 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4361726/ /pubmed/25743058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0026-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Evans, Nicholas G.
Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
title Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
title_full Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
title_fullStr Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
title_full_unstemmed Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
title_short Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
title_sort dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4361726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25743058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0026-y
work_keys_str_mv AT evansnicholasg dualusedecisionmakingrelationalandpositionalissues