Cargando…
Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review
According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295 |
_version_ | 1782361749267152896 |
---|---|
author | Dietrich, Julia F. Huber, Stefan Nuerk, Hans-Christoph |
author_facet | Dietrich, Julia F. Huber, Stefan Nuerk, Hans-Christoph |
author_sort | Dietrich, Julia F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results are inconsistent. This might be caused by studies differing greatly regarding the operationalization of the ANS (i.e., tasks, dependent variables). Moreover, many methodological aspects vary from one study to the next. In the present review, we discuss commonly used ANS tasks and dependent variables regarding their theoretical foundation and psychometric features. We argue that the inconsistent findings concerning the relationship between ANS acuity and math performance may be partially explained by differences in reliability. Furthermore, this review summarizes methodological aspects of ANS tasks having important impacts on the results, including stimulus range, visual controls, presentation duration of the stimuli and feedback. Based on this review, we give methodological recommendations on how to assess the ANS most reliably and most validly. All important methodological aspects to be considered when designing an ANS task or comparing results of different studies are summarized in two practical checklists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4362052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43620522015-04-07 Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review Dietrich, Julia F. Huber, Stefan Nuerk, Hans-Christoph Front Psychol Psychology According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results are inconsistent. This might be caused by studies differing greatly regarding the operationalization of the ANS (i.e., tasks, dependent variables). Moreover, many methodological aspects vary from one study to the next. In the present review, we discuss commonly used ANS tasks and dependent variables regarding their theoretical foundation and psychometric features. We argue that the inconsistent findings concerning the relationship between ANS acuity and math performance may be partially explained by differences in reliability. Furthermore, this review summarizes methodological aspects of ANS tasks having important impacts on the results, including stimulus range, visual controls, presentation duration of the stimuli and feedback. Based on this review, we give methodological recommendations on how to assess the ANS most reliably and most validly. All important methodological aspects to be considered when designing an ANS task or comparing results of different studies are summarized in two practical checklists. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4362052/ /pubmed/25852612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295 Text en Copyright © 2015 Dietrich, Huber and Nuerk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Dietrich, Julia F. Huber, Stefan Nuerk, Hans-Christoph Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review |
title | Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review |
title_full | Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review |
title_fullStr | Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review |
title_short | Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review |
title_sort | methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ans) – a research review |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dietrichjuliaf methodologicalaspectstobeconsideredwhenmeasuringtheapproximatenumbersystemansaresearchreview AT huberstefan methodologicalaspectstobeconsideredwhenmeasuringtheapproximatenumbersystemansaresearchreview AT nuerkhanschristoph methodologicalaspectstobeconsideredwhenmeasuringtheapproximatenumbersystemansaresearchreview |