Cargando…

Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review

According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dietrich, Julia F., Huber, Stefan, Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295
_version_ 1782361749267152896
author Dietrich, Julia F.
Huber, Stefan
Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
author_facet Dietrich, Julia F.
Huber, Stefan
Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
author_sort Dietrich, Julia F.
collection PubMed
description According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results are inconsistent. This might be caused by studies differing greatly regarding the operationalization of the ANS (i.e., tasks, dependent variables). Moreover, many methodological aspects vary from one study to the next. In the present review, we discuss commonly used ANS tasks and dependent variables regarding their theoretical foundation and psychometric features. We argue that the inconsistent findings concerning the relationship between ANS acuity and math performance may be partially explained by differences in reliability. Furthermore, this review summarizes methodological aspects of ANS tasks having important impacts on the results, including stimulus range, visual controls, presentation duration of the stimuli and feedback. Based on this review, we give methodological recommendations on how to assess the ANS most reliably and most validly. All important methodological aspects to be considered when designing an ANS task or comparing results of different studies are summarized in two practical checklists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4362052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43620522015-04-07 Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review Dietrich, Julia F. Huber, Stefan Nuerk, Hans-Christoph Front Psychol Psychology According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results are inconsistent. This might be caused by studies differing greatly regarding the operationalization of the ANS (i.e., tasks, dependent variables). Moreover, many methodological aspects vary from one study to the next. In the present review, we discuss commonly used ANS tasks and dependent variables regarding their theoretical foundation and psychometric features. We argue that the inconsistent findings concerning the relationship between ANS acuity and math performance may be partially explained by differences in reliability. Furthermore, this review summarizes methodological aspects of ANS tasks having important impacts on the results, including stimulus range, visual controls, presentation duration of the stimuli and feedback. Based on this review, we give methodological recommendations on how to assess the ANS most reliably and most validly. All important methodological aspects to be considered when designing an ANS task or comparing results of different studies are summarized in two practical checklists. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4362052/ /pubmed/25852612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295 Text en Copyright © 2015 Dietrich, Huber and Nuerk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Dietrich, Julia F.
Huber, Stefan
Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review
title Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review
title_full Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review
title_fullStr Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review
title_full_unstemmed Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review
title_short Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) – a research review
title_sort methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ans) – a research review
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295
work_keys_str_mv AT dietrichjuliaf methodologicalaspectstobeconsideredwhenmeasuringtheapproximatenumbersystemansaresearchreview
AT huberstefan methodologicalaspectstobeconsideredwhenmeasuringtheapproximatenumbersystemansaresearchreview
AT nuerkhanschristoph methodologicalaspectstobeconsideredwhenmeasuringtheapproximatenumbersystemansaresearchreview