Cargando…

Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in Saudi adults

OBJECTIVES: To test the reliability and validity of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS), and to correlate it with other demographic data. METHODS: The original English version of the MDAS was translated into Arabic, and then translated back into English by experienced bilin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahammam, Maha A., Hassan, Mona H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25399217
_version_ 1782361763450191872
author Bahammam, Maha A.
Hassan, Mona H.
author_facet Bahammam, Maha A.
Hassan, Mona H.
author_sort Bahammam, Maha A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To test the reliability and validity of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS), and to correlate it with other demographic data. METHODS: The original English version of the MDAS was translated into Arabic, and then translated back into English by experienced bilingual professionals. Four hundred and seventy-four patients referred to dental clinics for treatment at the Faculty of Dentistry Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from November 2012 to June 2013 participated in the study. The assessment tool included questions regarding demographic characteristics, frequency of dental visits, the Arabic version of the MDAS, and the patient's rating of their current level of anxiety using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The Arabic version of the MDAS had excellent internal consistency and reliability (Alpha coefficients >0.90). The scale was unidimensional, and the percentage of patients with dental anxiety was 48.3% (using a cutoff total score of >15) and with dental phobia was 2.5% (using a cutoff total score of >16). Younger patients, females, and infrequent visitors to the dentist were more anxious than those who were older, male, and frequent visitors. Visual analogue scale scores correlated significantly with individual items on the MDAS questionnaire and total anxiety score, supporting the criterion validity. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the MDAS presented adequate internal consistency reliability, allowing its safe use to assess levels of dental anxiety in Arabic-speaking populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4362135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43621352015-03-19 Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in Saudi adults Bahammam, Maha A. Hassan, Mona H. Saudi Med J Article OBJECTIVES: To test the reliability and validity of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS), and to correlate it with other demographic data. METHODS: The original English version of the MDAS was translated into Arabic, and then translated back into English by experienced bilingual professionals. Four hundred and seventy-four patients referred to dental clinics for treatment at the Faculty of Dentistry Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from November 2012 to June 2013 participated in the study. The assessment tool included questions regarding demographic characteristics, frequency of dental visits, the Arabic version of the MDAS, and the patient's rating of their current level of anxiety using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The Arabic version of the MDAS had excellent internal consistency and reliability (Alpha coefficients >0.90). The scale was unidimensional, and the percentage of patients with dental anxiety was 48.3% (using a cutoff total score of >15) and with dental phobia was 2.5% (using a cutoff total score of >16). Younger patients, females, and infrequent visitors to the dentist were more anxious than those who were older, male, and frequent visitors. Visual analogue scale scores correlated significantly with individual items on the MDAS questionnaire and total anxiety score, supporting the criterion validity. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the MDAS presented adequate internal consistency reliability, allowing its safe use to assess levels of dental anxiety in Arabic-speaking populations. Saudi Medical Journal 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4362135/ /pubmed/25399217 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 Saudi Medical Journal is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC). Readers may copy, distribute, and display the work for non-commercial purposes with the proper citation of the original work.
spellingShingle Article
Bahammam, Maha A.
Hassan, Mona H.
Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in Saudi adults
title Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in Saudi adults
title_full Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in Saudi adults
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in Saudi adults
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in Saudi adults
title_short Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in Saudi adults
title_sort validity and reliability of an arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale in saudi adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25399217
work_keys_str_mv AT bahammammahaa validityandreliabilityofanarabicversionofthemodifieddentalanxietyscaleinsaudiadults
AT hassanmonah validityandreliabilityofanarabicversionofthemodifieddentalanxietyscaleinsaudiadults