Cargando…

Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective

OBJECTIVES: To determine to which extent shared decision-making (SDM) is perceived in Saudi hospitals, and assess the willingness of the patients to participate in medical care decision making. METHODS: A cross sectional study using a non-probability technique (convenience sample) was carried out be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Askar, Mashael A., Alyaemni, Asmaa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362186/
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.10690
_version_ 1782361775414444032
author Al-Askar, Mashael A.
Alyaemni, Asmaa
author_facet Al-Askar, Mashael A.
Alyaemni, Asmaa
author_sort Al-Askar, Mashael A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine to which extent shared decision-making (SDM) is perceived in Saudi hospitals, and assess the willingness of the patients to participate in medical care decision making. METHODS: A cross sectional study using a non-probability technique (convenience sample) was carried out between March and April 2013 in a tertiary hospital among patients attending the Family and Community Medicine Department, and those who visited the Admission Office in the Surgery Department of Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We distributed our questionnaires using a non probability technique. Out of 450 questionnaires distributed, 327 were valid and coded in the data. To assess the decision making process between the patient’s and physicians we used a standardized international scale called shared decision-making (SDM-9) items.‎ The data was then entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 18 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Verbal approval was obtained from the correspondents to participate in this study. RESULTS: The sample represents patients mostly from the middle age group, range between 26-45 years, well-educated, and from the middle socio-economic group. The study shows a high score of SDM, ranging between 4.40 ± 1.3 to the highest score of 4.60 ± 1.1. The total dimension scores was 4.54 ± 0.84. The results also show a high degree of willingness ‎to participate in decision making (4.98 ± 0.9), and a desire, expressed by patients, to be aware of their health condition (5.02 ± 0.91). Almost all the participants agreed to utilize other communication facilities, such as mobile applications, Twitter, and others (5.16 ± 0.9). CONCLUSION: The level of SDM was highly fulfilled by the perception of patients in our sample. Additionally, the patients also look for other effective communication facilities, enhanced, and developed by the management of the hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4362186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43621862015-03-19 Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective Al-Askar, Mashael A. Alyaemni, Asmaa Saudi Med J Student Corner OBJECTIVES: To determine to which extent shared decision-making (SDM) is perceived in Saudi hospitals, and assess the willingness of the patients to participate in medical care decision making. METHODS: A cross sectional study using a non-probability technique (convenience sample) was carried out between March and April 2013 in a tertiary hospital among patients attending the Family and Community Medicine Department, and those who visited the Admission Office in the Surgery Department of Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We distributed our questionnaires using a non probability technique. Out of 450 questionnaires distributed, 327 were valid and coded in the data. To assess the decision making process between the patient’s and physicians we used a standardized international scale called shared decision-making (SDM-9) items.‎ The data was then entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 18 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Verbal approval was obtained from the correspondents to participate in this study. RESULTS: The sample represents patients mostly from the middle age group, range between 26-45 years, well-educated, and from the middle socio-economic group. The study shows a high score of SDM, ranging between 4.40 ± 1.3 to the highest score of 4.60 ± 1.1. The total dimension scores was 4.54 ± 0.84. The results also show a high degree of willingness ‎to participate in decision making (4.98 ± 0.9), and a desire, expressed by patients, to be aware of their health condition (5.02 ± 0.91). Almost all the participants agreed to utilize other communication facilities, such as mobile applications, Twitter, and others (5.16 ± 0.9). CONCLUSION: The level of SDM was highly fulfilled by the perception of patients in our sample. Additionally, the patients also look for other effective communication facilities, enhanced, and developed by the management of the hospital. Saudi Medical Journal 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4362186/ http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.10690 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Student Corner
Al-Askar, Mashael A.
Alyaemni, Asmaa
Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
title Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
title_full Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
title_fullStr Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
title_short Assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
title_sort assessment of shared decision-making from the patient’s perspective
topic Student Corner
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362186/
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.10690
work_keys_str_mv AT alaskarmashaela assessmentofshareddecisionmakingfromthepatientsperspective
AT alyaemniasmaa assessmentofshareddecisionmakingfromthepatientsperspective