Cargando…

The Relationship between Grade of Ischemia, Success of Reperfusion, and Type of Thrombolytic Regimen

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to determine whether the grade of ischemia can predict the success of reperfusion in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy (TT) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MATERIAL/METHODS: We enrolled 229 consecutive patients with diagnosis of STEMI and rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayça, Burak, Conkbayır, Cenk, Katkat, Fahrettin, Gulsen, Kamil, Akin, Fatih, Okuyan, Ertuğrul, Baskurt, Murat, Okcun, Barıs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25746841
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892645
_version_ 1782361821045325824
author Ayça, Burak
Conkbayır, Cenk
Katkat, Fahrettin
Gulsen, Kamil
Akin, Fatih
Okuyan, Ertuğrul
Baskurt, Murat
Okcun, Barıs
author_facet Ayça, Burak
Conkbayır, Cenk
Katkat, Fahrettin
Gulsen, Kamil
Akin, Fatih
Okuyan, Ertuğrul
Baskurt, Murat
Okcun, Barıs
author_sort Ayça, Burak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to determine whether the grade of ischemia can predict the success of reperfusion in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy (TT) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MATERIAL/METHODS: We enrolled 229 consecutive patients with diagnosis of STEMI and receiving TT. Patients were divided into 2 groups – grade 2 ischemia (GI2) and grade 3 ischemia (GI3) – according to initial electrocardiogram (ECG). As TT, fibrin-specific (tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA)) or non-fibrin-specific (streptokinase (SKZ)) regimens were used. Successful reperfusion was defined as >50% resolution of the maximal ST segment on 90-min ECG. We tried to evaluate whether the grade of ischemia could predict the success of reperfusion and if there were any differences in terms of successful reperfusion between different thrombolytic regimens. RESULTS: The successful reperfusion rate was significantly higher in GI2 than GI3 (82.4% vs. 64.4% respectively, p=0.002). The success rate was lowest at anterior GI3 (55.8%). Although there was no significant difference between thrombolytic regimens in all groups (p=0.77), t-Pa was superior to SKZ in anterior GI3 (63,6% vs. 30%, p=0.061). In addition, in multivariate analysis, GI and infarct localization were found as independent predictors for successful reperfusion with TT (p=0.006 and p=0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we found that GI2 is an independent predictor for successful reperfusion in STEMI treated with TT. Fibrin specific regime should be preferred in anterior GI3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4362488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43624882015-03-25 The Relationship between Grade of Ischemia, Success of Reperfusion, and Type of Thrombolytic Regimen Ayça, Burak Conkbayır, Cenk Katkat, Fahrettin Gulsen, Kamil Akin, Fatih Okuyan, Ertuğrul Baskurt, Murat Okcun, Barıs Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to determine whether the grade of ischemia can predict the success of reperfusion in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy (TT) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MATERIAL/METHODS: We enrolled 229 consecutive patients with diagnosis of STEMI and receiving TT. Patients were divided into 2 groups – grade 2 ischemia (GI2) and grade 3 ischemia (GI3) – according to initial electrocardiogram (ECG). As TT, fibrin-specific (tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA)) or non-fibrin-specific (streptokinase (SKZ)) regimens were used. Successful reperfusion was defined as >50% resolution of the maximal ST segment on 90-min ECG. We tried to evaluate whether the grade of ischemia could predict the success of reperfusion and if there were any differences in terms of successful reperfusion between different thrombolytic regimens. RESULTS: The successful reperfusion rate was significantly higher in GI2 than GI3 (82.4% vs. 64.4% respectively, p=0.002). The success rate was lowest at anterior GI3 (55.8%). Although there was no significant difference between thrombolytic regimens in all groups (p=0.77), t-Pa was superior to SKZ in anterior GI3 (63,6% vs. 30%, p=0.061). In addition, in multivariate analysis, GI and infarct localization were found as independent predictors for successful reperfusion with TT (p=0.006 and p=0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we found that GI2 is an independent predictor for successful reperfusion in STEMI treated with TT. Fibrin specific regime should be preferred in anterior GI3. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4362488/ /pubmed/25746841 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892645 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ayça, Burak
Conkbayır, Cenk
Katkat, Fahrettin
Gulsen, Kamil
Akin, Fatih
Okuyan, Ertuğrul
Baskurt, Murat
Okcun, Barıs
The Relationship between Grade of Ischemia, Success of Reperfusion, and Type of Thrombolytic Regimen
title The Relationship between Grade of Ischemia, Success of Reperfusion, and Type of Thrombolytic Regimen
title_full The Relationship between Grade of Ischemia, Success of Reperfusion, and Type of Thrombolytic Regimen
title_fullStr The Relationship between Grade of Ischemia, Success of Reperfusion, and Type of Thrombolytic Regimen
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Grade of Ischemia, Success of Reperfusion, and Type of Thrombolytic Regimen
title_short The Relationship between Grade of Ischemia, Success of Reperfusion, and Type of Thrombolytic Regimen
title_sort relationship between grade of ischemia, success of reperfusion, and type of thrombolytic regimen
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25746841
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.892645
work_keys_str_mv AT aycaburak therelationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT conkbayırcenk therelationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT katkatfahrettin therelationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT gulsenkamil therelationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT akinfatih therelationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT okuyanertugrul therelationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT baskurtmurat therelationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT okcunbarıs therelationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT aycaburak relationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT conkbayırcenk relationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT katkatfahrettin relationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT gulsenkamil relationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT akinfatih relationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT okuyanertugrul relationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT baskurtmurat relationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen
AT okcunbarıs relationshipbetweengradeofischemiasuccessofreperfusionandtypeofthrombolyticregimen