Cargando…
Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images
PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the linear distance accuracy and reliability of stitched small field of view (FOV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstructed images for the fabrication of implant surgical guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three gutta percha points were fixed on th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793182 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.1.41 |
_version_ | 1782361864190033920 |
---|---|
author | Egbert, Nicholas Cagna, David R. Ahuja, Swati Wicks, Russell A. |
author_facet | Egbert, Nicholas Cagna, David R. Ahuja, Swati Wicks, Russell A. |
author_sort | Egbert, Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the linear distance accuracy and reliability of stitched small field of view (FOV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstructed images for the fabrication of implant surgical guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three gutta percha points were fixed on the inferior border of a cadaveric mandible to serve as control reference points. Ten additional gutta percha points, representing fiduciary markers, were scattered on the buccal and lingual cortices at the level of the proposed complete denture flange. A digital caliper was used to measure the distance between the reference points and fiduciary markers, which represented the anatomic linear dimension. The mandible was scanned using small FOV CBCT, and the images were then reconstructed and stitched using the manufacturer's imaging software. The same measurements were then taken with the CBCT software. RESULTS: The anatomic linear dimension measurements and stitched small FOV CBCT measurements were statistically evaluated for linear accuracy. The mean difference between the anatomic linear dimension measurements and the stitched small FOV CBCT measurements was found to be 0.34 mm with a 95% confidence interval of +0.24 - +0.44 mm and a mean standard deviation of 0.30 mm. The difference between the control and the stitched small FOV CBCT measurements was insignificant within the parameters defined by this study. CONCLUSION: The proven accuracy of stitched small FOV CBCT data sets may allow image-guided fabrication of implant surgical stents from such data sets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4362990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43629902015-03-19 Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images Egbert, Nicholas Cagna, David R. Ahuja, Swati Wicks, Russell A. Imaging Sci Dent Original Article PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the linear distance accuracy and reliability of stitched small field of view (FOV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstructed images for the fabrication of implant surgical guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three gutta percha points were fixed on the inferior border of a cadaveric mandible to serve as control reference points. Ten additional gutta percha points, representing fiduciary markers, were scattered on the buccal and lingual cortices at the level of the proposed complete denture flange. A digital caliper was used to measure the distance between the reference points and fiduciary markers, which represented the anatomic linear dimension. The mandible was scanned using small FOV CBCT, and the images were then reconstructed and stitched using the manufacturer's imaging software. The same measurements were then taken with the CBCT software. RESULTS: The anatomic linear dimension measurements and stitched small FOV CBCT measurements were statistically evaluated for linear accuracy. The mean difference between the anatomic linear dimension measurements and the stitched small FOV CBCT measurements was found to be 0.34 mm with a 95% confidence interval of +0.24 - +0.44 mm and a mean standard deviation of 0.30 mm. The difference between the control and the stitched small FOV CBCT measurements was insignificant within the parameters defined by this study. CONCLUSION: The proven accuracy of stitched small FOV CBCT data sets may allow image-guided fabrication of implant surgical stents from such data sets. Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2015-03 2015-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4362990/ /pubmed/25793182 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.1.41 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Egbert, Nicholas Cagna, David R. Ahuja, Swati Wicks, Russell A. Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images |
title | Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_full | Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_fullStr | Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_short | Accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_sort | accuracy and reliability of stitched cone-beam computed tomography images |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4362990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25793182 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.1.41 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT egbertnicholas accuracyandreliabilityofstitchedconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT cagnadavidr accuracyandreliabilityofstitchedconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT ahujaswati accuracyandreliabilityofstitchedconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT wicksrussella accuracyandreliabilityofstitchedconebeamcomputedtomographyimages |