Cargando…

Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effective doses (ICRP 103) in the ankle region of X-ray imaging resulting from a multi slice computed tomography (MSCT) device, two cone beam CT (CBCT) devices and one conventional x-ray device. METHODS: Organ dose measurements were per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koivisto, Juha, Kiljunen, Timo, Kadesjö, Nils, Shi, Xie-Qi, Wolff, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25788986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0067-8
_version_ 1782361874599247872
author Koivisto, Juha
Kiljunen, Timo
Kadesjö, Nils
Shi, Xie-Qi
Wolff, Jan
author_facet Koivisto, Juha
Kiljunen, Timo
Kadesjö, Nils
Shi, Xie-Qi
Wolff, Jan
author_sort Koivisto, Juha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effective doses (ICRP 103) in the ankle region of X-ray imaging resulting from a multi slice computed tomography (MSCT) device, two cone beam CT (CBCT) devices and one conventional x-ray device. METHODS: Organ dose measurements were performed using 20 metal oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters that were placed in a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO ankle phantom. The following scanners were assessed in this study: Siemens Sensation Open 24-slice MSCT-scanner (120 kVp, 54 mAs), NewTom 5G CBCT scanner (110 kVp, 2.3 - 59 mAs), Planmed Verity CBCT-scanner (90 kVp, 48 mAs), Shimadzu FH-21 HR direct radiography equipment (AP + LAT), (57 kVp, 16 mAs). RESULTS: Measurements of the MSCT device resulted in 21.4 μSv effective dose. The effective doses of CBCTs were between 1.9 μSv and 14.3 μSv for NewTom 5G and 6.0 μSv for Planmed Verity. Effective doses for the Shimadzu FH-21 HR conventional radiography were 1.0 μSv (LAT) and 0.5 μSv (AP), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a conventional 2D radiographic device, this study showed a 14-fold effective dose for standard MSCT and 1.3 -10 fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. CBCT devices offers a 3D view of ankle imaging and exhibited lower effective doses compared with MSCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4363062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43630622015-03-19 Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region Koivisto, Juha Kiljunen, Timo Kadesjö, Nils Shi, Xie-Qi Wolff, Jan J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effective doses (ICRP 103) in the ankle region of X-ray imaging resulting from a multi slice computed tomography (MSCT) device, two cone beam CT (CBCT) devices and one conventional x-ray device. METHODS: Organ dose measurements were performed using 20 metal oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters that were placed in a custom made anthropomorphic RANDO ankle phantom. The following scanners were assessed in this study: Siemens Sensation Open 24-slice MSCT-scanner (120 kVp, 54 mAs), NewTom 5G CBCT scanner (110 kVp, 2.3 - 59 mAs), Planmed Verity CBCT-scanner (90 kVp, 48 mAs), Shimadzu FH-21 HR direct radiography equipment (AP + LAT), (57 kVp, 16 mAs). RESULTS: Measurements of the MSCT device resulted in 21.4 μSv effective dose. The effective doses of CBCTs were between 1.9 μSv and 14.3 μSv for NewTom 5G and 6.0 μSv for Planmed Verity. Effective doses for the Shimadzu FH-21 HR conventional radiography were 1.0 μSv (LAT) and 0.5 μSv (AP), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a conventional 2D radiographic device, this study showed a 14-fold effective dose for standard MSCT and 1.3 -10 fold effective dose for standard CBCT protocols. CBCT devices offers a 3D view of ankle imaging and exhibited lower effective doses compared with MSCT. BioMed Central 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4363062/ /pubmed/25788986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0067-8 Text en © Koivisto et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Koivisto, Juha
Kiljunen, Timo
Kadesjö, Nils
Shi, Xie-Qi
Wolff, Jan
Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region
title Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region
title_full Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region
title_fullStr Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region
title_full_unstemmed Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region
title_short Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region
title_sort effective radiation dose of a msct, two cbct and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25788986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0067-8
work_keys_str_mv AT koivistojuha effectiveradiationdoseofamscttwocbctandoneconventionalradiographydeviceintheankleregion
AT kiljunentimo effectiveradiationdoseofamscttwocbctandoneconventionalradiographydeviceintheankleregion
AT kadesjonils effectiveradiationdoseofamscttwocbctandoneconventionalradiographydeviceintheankleregion
AT shixieqi effectiveradiationdoseofamscttwocbctandoneconventionalradiographydeviceintheankleregion
AT wolffjan effectiveradiationdoseofamscttwocbctandoneconventionalradiographydeviceintheankleregion