Cargando…
Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is a new technique with the benefits of a three-dimensional view, the ability to use multi-degree-of-freedom forceps, the elimination of physiological tremors, and a stable camera view. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of robot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0517-6 |
_version_ | 1782361875055378432 |
---|---|
author | Sawada, Hiroyuki Egi, Hiroyuki Hattori, Minoru Suzuki, Takahisa Shimomura, Manabu Tanabe, Kazuaki Okajima, Masazumi Ohdan, Hideki |
author_facet | Sawada, Hiroyuki Egi, Hiroyuki Hattori, Minoru Suzuki, Takahisa Shimomura, Manabu Tanabe, Kazuaki Okajima, Masazumi Ohdan, Hideki |
author_sort | Sawada, Hiroyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is a new technique with the benefits of a three-dimensional view, the ability to use multi-degree-of-freedom forceps, the elimination of physiological tremors, and a stable camera view. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer as initial cases, compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: From July 2010 to June 2013, ten patients with left-sided colon and rectal cancer underwent robotic surgery, and 121 received conventional laparoscopic surgery. Both groups were balanced in terms of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), operative history, TNM staging, and tumor location. Moreover, in order to improve objectivity and approximate a randomized controlled study, we used the propensity score matching method. The matching was successful because the ROC analysis showed a well-balanced curve (C = 0.535). RESULTS: Following propensity score matching, ten patients were included in the robotic surgery group and 20 patients were included in the conventional laparoscopic surgery group. There were no significant differences in the short-term clinicopathologic outcomes between the robotic surgery group and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group. However, the operative time was significantly longer in the robotic surgery group than in the conventional laparoscopic surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between the robotic surgery group and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group with respect to short-term clinicopathologic outcomes, with the exception of the operative time. Our early experience indicates that robotic surgery is a promising tool, particularly in patients with rectal cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12957-015-0517-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4363064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43630642015-03-19 Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study Sawada, Hiroyuki Egi, Hiroyuki Hattori, Minoru Suzuki, Takahisa Shimomura, Manabu Tanabe, Kazuaki Okajima, Masazumi Ohdan, Hideki World J Surg Oncol Technical Innovations BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is a new technique with the benefits of a three-dimensional view, the ability to use multi-degree-of-freedom forceps, the elimination of physiological tremors, and a stable camera view. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer as initial cases, compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: From July 2010 to June 2013, ten patients with left-sided colon and rectal cancer underwent robotic surgery, and 121 received conventional laparoscopic surgery. Both groups were balanced in terms of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), operative history, TNM staging, and tumor location. Moreover, in order to improve objectivity and approximate a randomized controlled study, we used the propensity score matching method. The matching was successful because the ROC analysis showed a well-balanced curve (C = 0.535). RESULTS: Following propensity score matching, ten patients were included in the robotic surgery group and 20 patients were included in the conventional laparoscopic surgery group. There were no significant differences in the short-term clinicopathologic outcomes between the robotic surgery group and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group. However, the operative time was significantly longer in the robotic surgery group than in the conventional laparoscopic surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between the robotic surgery group and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group with respect to short-term clinicopathologic outcomes, with the exception of the operative time. Our early experience indicates that robotic surgery is a promising tool, particularly in patients with rectal cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12957-015-0517-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4363064/ /pubmed/25885046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0517-6 Text en © Sawada et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Innovations Sawada, Hiroyuki Egi, Hiroyuki Hattori, Minoru Suzuki, Takahisa Shimomura, Manabu Tanabe, Kazuaki Okajima, Masazumi Ohdan, Hideki Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study |
title | Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study |
title_full | Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study |
title_fullStr | Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study |
title_short | Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study |
title_sort | initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study |
topic | Technical Innovations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0517-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sawadahiroyuki initialexperiencesofroboticversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerfocusingonshorttermoutcomesamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT egihiroyuki initialexperiencesofroboticversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerfocusingonshorttermoutcomesamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT hattoriminoru initialexperiencesofroboticversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerfocusingonshorttermoutcomesamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT suzukitakahisa initialexperiencesofroboticversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerfocusingonshorttermoutcomesamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT shimomuramanabu initialexperiencesofroboticversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerfocusingonshorttermoutcomesamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT tanabekazuaki initialexperiencesofroboticversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerfocusingonshorttermoutcomesamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT okajimamasazumi initialexperiencesofroboticversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerfocusingonshorttermoutcomesamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT ohdanhideki initialexperiencesofroboticversusconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforcolorectalcancerfocusingonshorttermoutcomesamatchedcasecontrolstudy |