Cargando…

Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND: The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter, Anheuser, Petra, Schmidt, Stefan, Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin, Pichlmeier, Uwe, Schriefer, Philipp, Matthies, Cord, Hartmann, Michael, Ruf, Christian G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0
_version_ 1782361900910116864
author Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter
Anheuser, Petra
Schmidt, Stefan
Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin
Pichlmeier, Uwe
Schriefer, Philipp
Matthies, Cord
Hartmann, Michael
Ruf, Christian G
author_facet Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter
Anheuser, Petra
Schmidt, Stefan
Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin
Pichlmeier, Uwe
Schriefer, Philipp
Matthies, Cord
Hartmann, Michael
Ruf, Christian G
author_sort Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant. RESULTS: 26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was “very high” and “high” in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4363351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43633512015-03-19 Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter Anheuser, Petra Schmidt, Stefan Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin Pichlmeier, Uwe Schriefer, Philipp Matthies, Cord Hartmann, Michael Ruf, Christian G BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: The loss of a testicle to cancer involves much emotional impact to young males. Little is known about the number of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (GCT) who would accept a testicular prosthesis. Also, knowledge about the satisfaction of implant recipients with the device is limited. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 475 consecutive GCT patients. Prior to orchiectomy, all patients were offered prosthesis insertion. Acceptance of implant was noted along with age, clinical stage, histology and year of surgery. 171 implant recipients were interviewed using an 18 item questionnaire to analyze satisfaction with the prosthesis. Statistical analysis involved calculating proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for interrelations between the various items of satisfaction with the implant. RESULTS: 26.9% of the patients accepted a prosthesis. The acceptance rate was significantly higher in younger men. Over-all satisfaction with the implant was “very high” and “high” in 31.1% and 52.4%, respectively. 86% would decide again to have a prosthesis. Particular items of dis-satisfaction were: implant too firm (52.4%), shape inconvenient (15.4%), implant too small (23.8%), position too high (30.3%). Living with a permanent partner had no influence on patient ratings. Multivariate analysis disclosed numerous inter-relations between the particular items of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: More than one quarter of GCT patients wish to have a testicular prosthesis. Over-all satisfaction with implants is high in more than 80% of patients. Thus, all patients undergoing surgery for GCT should be offered a testicular prosthesis. However, surgeons should be aware of specific items of dis-satisfaction, particularly shape, size and consistency of the implant and inconvenient high position of the implant within the scrotum. Appropriate preoperative counselling is paramount. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4363351/ /pubmed/25887552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0 Text en © Dieckmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dieckmann, Klaus-Peter
Anheuser, Petra
Schmidt, Stefan
Soyka-Hundt, Benjamin
Pichlmeier, Uwe
Schriefer, Philipp
Matthies, Cord
Hartmann, Michael
Ruf, Christian G
Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
title Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
title_full Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
title_fullStr Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
title_short Testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
title_sort testicular prostheses in patients with testicular cancer - acceptance rate and patient satisfaction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0010-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dieckmannklauspeter testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction
AT anheuserpetra testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction
AT schmidtstefan testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction
AT soykahundtbenjamin testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction
AT pichlmeieruwe testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction
AT schrieferphilipp testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction
AT matthiescord testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction
AT hartmannmichael testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction
AT rufchristiang testicularprosthesesinpatientswithtesticularcanceracceptancerateandpatientsatisfaction