Cargando…

Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?

The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heurich, Marco, Brand, Tom T. G., Kaandorp, Manon Y., Šustr, Pavel, Müller, Jörg, Reineking, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120960
_version_ 1782361905060380672
author Heurich, Marco
Brand, Tom T. G.
Kaandorp, Manon Y.
Šustr, Pavel
Müller, Jörg
Reineking, Björn
author_facet Heurich, Marco
Brand, Tom T. G.
Kaandorp, Manon Y.
Šustr, Pavel
Müller, Jörg
Reineking, Björn
author_sort Heurich, Marco
collection PubMed
description The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at unravelling the influence of management-related and environmental factors on the distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in this ecosystem. We used the standing crop method based on counts of pellet groups, with point counts every 100 m along 218 randomly distributed transects. Our analysis, which accounted for overdispersion as well as zero inflation and spatial autocorrelation, corroborated the view that both human management and the physical and biological environment drive ungulate distribution in mountainous areas in Central Europe. In contrast to our expectations, protection by national parks was the least important variable for red deer and the third important out of four variables for roe deer; protection negatively influenced roe deer distribution in both parks and positively influenced red deer distribution in Germany. Country was the most influential variable for both red and roe deer, with higher counts of pellet groups in the Czech Republic than in Germany. Elevation, which indicates increasing environmental harshness, was the second most important variable for both species. Forest cover was the least important variable for roe deer and the third important variable for red deer; the relationship for roe deer was positive and linear, and optimal forest cover for red deer was about 70% within a 500 m radius. Our results have direct implications for the future conservation management of deer in protected areas in Central Europe and show in particular that large non-intervention zones may not cause agglomerations of deer that could lead to conflicts along the border of protected, mountainous areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4363369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43633692015-03-23 Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem? Heurich, Marco Brand, Tom T. G. Kaandorp, Manon Y. Šustr, Pavel Müller, Jörg Reineking, Björn PLoS One Research Article The Bohemian Forest Ecosystem encompasses various wildlife management systems. Two large, contiguous national parks (one in Germany and one in the Czech Republic) form the centre of the area, are surrounded by private hunting grounds, and hunting regulations in each country differ. Here we aimed at unravelling the influence of management-related and environmental factors on the distribution of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in this ecosystem. We used the standing crop method based on counts of pellet groups, with point counts every 100 m along 218 randomly distributed transects. Our analysis, which accounted for overdispersion as well as zero inflation and spatial autocorrelation, corroborated the view that both human management and the physical and biological environment drive ungulate distribution in mountainous areas in Central Europe. In contrast to our expectations, protection by national parks was the least important variable for red deer and the third important out of four variables for roe deer; protection negatively influenced roe deer distribution in both parks and positively influenced red deer distribution in Germany. Country was the most influential variable for both red and roe deer, with higher counts of pellet groups in the Czech Republic than in Germany. Elevation, which indicates increasing environmental harshness, was the second most important variable for both species. Forest cover was the least important variable for roe deer and the third important variable for red deer; the relationship for roe deer was positive and linear, and optimal forest cover for red deer was about 70% within a 500 m radius. Our results have direct implications for the future conservation management of deer in protected areas in Central Europe and show in particular that large non-intervention zones may not cause agglomerations of deer that could lead to conflicts along the border of protected, mountainous areas. Public Library of Science 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4363369/ /pubmed/25781942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120960 Text en © 2015 Heurich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heurich, Marco
Brand, Tom T. G.
Kaandorp, Manon Y.
Šustr, Pavel
Müller, Jörg
Reineking, Björn
Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?
title Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?
title_full Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?
title_fullStr Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?
title_full_unstemmed Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?
title_short Country, Cover or Protection: What Shapes the Distribution of Red Deer and Roe Deer in the Bohemian Forest Ecosystem?
title_sort country, cover or protection: what shapes the distribution of red deer and roe deer in the bohemian forest ecosystem?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120960
work_keys_str_mv AT heurichmarco countrycoverorprotectionwhatshapesthedistributionofreddeerandroedeerinthebohemianforestecosystem
AT brandtomtg countrycoverorprotectionwhatshapesthedistributionofreddeerandroedeerinthebohemianforestecosystem
AT kaandorpmanony countrycoverorprotectionwhatshapesthedistributionofreddeerandroedeerinthebohemianforestecosystem
AT sustrpavel countrycoverorprotectionwhatshapesthedistributionofreddeerandroedeerinthebohemianforestecosystem
AT mullerjorg countrycoverorprotectionwhatshapesthedistributionofreddeerandroedeerinthebohemianforestecosystem
AT reinekingbjorn countrycoverorprotectionwhatshapesthedistributionofreddeerandroedeerinthebohemianforestecosystem