Cargando…

Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process

This pioneering observational study explored the interaction between subacute stroke inpatients and a rehabilitation robot during upper limb training. 25 stroke survivors (age 55 ± 17 years; time since stroke, 52 ± 21 days) with severe upper limb paresis carried out 16 sessions of robot-assisted sho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duret, Christophe, Courtial, Ophélie, Grosmaire, Anne-Gaëlle, Hutin, Emilie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/482389
_version_ 1782361920753369088
author Duret, Christophe
Courtial, Ophélie
Grosmaire, Anne-Gaëlle
Hutin, Emilie
author_facet Duret, Christophe
Courtial, Ophélie
Grosmaire, Anne-Gaëlle
Hutin, Emilie
author_sort Duret, Christophe
collection PubMed
description This pioneering observational study explored the interaction between subacute stroke inpatients and a rehabilitation robot during upper limb training. 25 stroke survivors (age 55 ± 17 years; time since stroke, 52 ± 21 days) with severe upper limb paresis carried out 16 sessions of robot-assisted shoulder/elbow training (InMotion 2.0, IMT, Inc., MA, USA) combined with standard therapy. The values of 3 patient/robot interaction parameters (a guidance parameter: Stiffness, a velocity-related parameter: Slottime, and Robotic Power) were compared between sessions 1 (S1), 4 (S4), 8 (S8), 12 (S12), and 16 (S16). Pre/post Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores were compared in 18 patients. Correlations between interaction parameters and clinical and kinematic outcome measures were evaluated. Slottime decreased at S8 (P = 0.003), while Guidance decreased at S12 (P = 0.008). Robotic Power tended to decrease until S16. FMA scores improved from S1 to S16 (+49%, P = 0.002). Changes in FMA score were correlated with the Stiffness parameter (R = 0.4, P = 0.003). Slottime was correlated with movement velocity. This novel approach demonstrated that a robotic device is a useful and reliable tool for the quantification of interaction parameters. Moreover, changes in these parameters were correlated with clinical and kinematic changes. These results suggested that robot-based recordings can provide new insights into the motor recovery process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4363505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43635052015-03-29 Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process Duret, Christophe Courtial, Ophélie Grosmaire, Anne-Gaëlle Hutin, Emilie Biomed Res Int Research Article This pioneering observational study explored the interaction between subacute stroke inpatients and a rehabilitation robot during upper limb training. 25 stroke survivors (age 55 ± 17 years; time since stroke, 52 ± 21 days) with severe upper limb paresis carried out 16 sessions of robot-assisted shoulder/elbow training (InMotion 2.0, IMT, Inc., MA, USA) combined with standard therapy. The values of 3 patient/robot interaction parameters (a guidance parameter: Stiffness, a velocity-related parameter: Slottime, and Robotic Power) were compared between sessions 1 (S1), 4 (S4), 8 (S8), 12 (S12), and 16 (S16). Pre/post Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores were compared in 18 patients. Correlations between interaction parameters and clinical and kinematic outcome measures were evaluated. Slottime decreased at S8 (P = 0.003), while Guidance decreased at S12 (P = 0.008). Robotic Power tended to decrease until S16. FMA scores improved from S1 to S16 (+49%, P = 0.002). Changes in FMA score were correlated with the Stiffness parameter (R = 0.4, P = 0.003). Slottime was correlated with movement velocity. This novel approach demonstrated that a robotic device is a useful and reliable tool for the quantification of interaction parameters. Moreover, changes in these parameters were correlated with clinical and kinematic changes. These results suggested that robot-based recordings can provide new insights into the motor recovery process. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4363505/ /pubmed/25821804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/482389 Text en Copyright © 2015 Christophe Duret et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duret, Christophe
Courtial, Ophélie
Grosmaire, Anne-Gaëlle
Hutin, Emilie
Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process
title Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process
title_full Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process
title_fullStr Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process
title_full_unstemmed Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process
title_short Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process
title_sort use of a robotic device for the rehabilitation of severe upper limb paresis in subacute stroke: exploration of patient/robot interactions and the motor recovery process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25821804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/482389
work_keys_str_mv AT duretchristophe useofaroboticdevicefortherehabilitationofsevereupperlimbparesisinsubacutestrokeexplorationofpatientrobotinteractionsandthemotorrecoveryprocess
AT courtialophelie useofaroboticdevicefortherehabilitationofsevereupperlimbparesisinsubacutestrokeexplorationofpatientrobotinteractionsandthemotorrecoveryprocess
AT grosmaireannegaelle useofaroboticdevicefortherehabilitationofsevereupperlimbparesisinsubacutestrokeexplorationofpatientrobotinteractionsandthemotorrecoveryprocess
AT hutinemilie useofaroboticdevicefortherehabilitationofsevereupperlimbparesisinsubacutestrokeexplorationofpatientrobotinteractionsandthemotorrecoveryprocess