Cargando…

The Evolution of Dental Journals from 2003 to 2012: A Bibliometric Analysis

Bibliometrics are a set of methods, which can be used to analyze academic literature quantitatively and its changes over time. The objectives of this study were 1) to evaluate trends related to academic performance of dental journals from 2003 to 2012 using bibliometric indices, and 2) monitor the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayaratne, Yasas Shri Nalaka, Zwahlen, Roger Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119503
_version_ 1782361989183438848
author Jayaratne, Yasas Shri Nalaka
Zwahlen, Roger Arthur
author_facet Jayaratne, Yasas Shri Nalaka
Zwahlen, Roger Arthur
author_sort Jayaratne, Yasas Shri Nalaka
collection PubMed
description Bibliometrics are a set of methods, which can be used to analyze academic literature quantitatively and its changes over time. The objectives of this study were 1) to evaluate trends related to academic performance of dental journals from 2003 to 2012 using bibliometric indices, and 2) monitor the changes of the five dental journals with the highest and lowest impact factor (IF) published in 2003. Data for the subject category "Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine" was retrieved from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) published from 2003 to 2012. Linear regressions analysis was used to determine statistical trends over the years with each bibliometric indicator as the dependent variable and the JCR year as the predictor variable. Statistically significant rise in the total number of dental journals, the number of all articles with the steepest rise observed for research articles, the number of citations and the aggregate IF was observed from 2003 to 2012. The analysis of the five top and five bottom-tire dental journals revealed a rise in IF however, with a wide variation in relation to the magnitude of this rise. Although the IF of the top five journals remained relatively constant, the percentile ranks of the four lowest ranking journals in 2003 increased significantly with the sharpest rise being noted for the British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. This study revealed significant growth of dental literature in absolute terms, as well as upward trends for most of the citation-based bibliometric indices from 2003 to 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4363896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43638962015-03-23 The Evolution of Dental Journals from 2003 to 2012: A Bibliometric Analysis Jayaratne, Yasas Shri Nalaka Zwahlen, Roger Arthur PLoS One Research Article Bibliometrics are a set of methods, which can be used to analyze academic literature quantitatively and its changes over time. The objectives of this study were 1) to evaluate trends related to academic performance of dental journals from 2003 to 2012 using bibliometric indices, and 2) monitor the changes of the five dental journals with the highest and lowest impact factor (IF) published in 2003. Data for the subject category "Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine" was retrieved from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) published from 2003 to 2012. Linear regressions analysis was used to determine statistical trends over the years with each bibliometric indicator as the dependent variable and the JCR year as the predictor variable. Statistically significant rise in the total number of dental journals, the number of all articles with the steepest rise observed for research articles, the number of citations and the aggregate IF was observed from 2003 to 2012. The analysis of the five top and five bottom-tire dental journals revealed a rise in IF however, with a wide variation in relation to the magnitude of this rise. Although the IF of the top five journals remained relatively constant, the percentile ranks of the four lowest ranking journals in 2003 increased significantly with the sharpest rise being noted for the British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. This study revealed significant growth of dental literature in absolute terms, as well as upward trends for most of the citation-based bibliometric indices from 2003 to 2012. Public Library of Science 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4363896/ /pubmed/25781486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119503 Text en © 2015 Jayaratne, Zwahlen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jayaratne, Yasas Shri Nalaka
Zwahlen, Roger Arthur
The Evolution of Dental Journals from 2003 to 2012: A Bibliometric Analysis
title The Evolution of Dental Journals from 2003 to 2012: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_full The Evolution of Dental Journals from 2003 to 2012: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_fullStr The Evolution of Dental Journals from 2003 to 2012: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Dental Journals from 2003 to 2012: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_short The Evolution of Dental Journals from 2003 to 2012: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_sort evolution of dental journals from 2003 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119503
work_keys_str_mv AT jayaratneyasasshrinalaka theevolutionofdentaljournalsfrom2003to2012abibliometricanalysis
AT zwahlenrogerarthur theevolutionofdentaljournalsfrom2003to2012abibliometricanalysis
AT jayaratneyasasshrinalaka evolutionofdentaljournalsfrom2003to2012abibliometricanalysis
AT zwahlenrogerarthur evolutionofdentaljournalsfrom2003to2012abibliometricanalysis