Cargando…

Bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the European Union

BACKGROUND: The European Union has made it a strategic objective to develop its biofuels market in order to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, to help mitigate climate change and to address energy insecurity within the transport sector. Despite targets set at national and supranational levels,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Littlewood, Jade, Guo, Miao, Boerjan, Wout, Murphy, Richard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25788978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-113
_version_ 1782362025561686016
author Littlewood, Jade
Guo, Miao
Boerjan, Wout
Murphy, Richard J
author_facet Littlewood, Jade
Guo, Miao
Boerjan, Wout
Murphy, Richard J
author_sort Littlewood, Jade
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The European Union has made it a strategic objective to develop its biofuels market in order to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, to help mitigate climate change and to address energy insecurity within the transport sector. Despite targets set at national and supranational levels, lignocellulosic bioethanol production has yet to be widely commercialized in the European Union. Here, we use techno-economic modeling to compare the price of bioethanol produced from short rotation coppice (SRC) poplar feedstocks under two leading processing technologies in five European countries. RESULTS: Our evaluation shows that the type of processing technology and varying national costs between countries results in a wide range of bioethanol production prices (€0.275 to 0.727/l). The lowest production prices for bioethanol were found in countries that had cheap feedstock costs and high prices for renewable electricity. Taxes and other costs had a significant influence on fuel prices at the petrol station, and therefore the presence and amount of government support for bioethanol was a major factor determining the competitiveness of bioethanol with conventional fuel. In a forward-looking scenario, genetically engineering poplar with a reduced lignin content showed potential to enhance the competitiveness of bioethanol with conventional fuel by reducing overall costs by approximately 41% in four out of the five countries modeled. However, the possible wider phenotypic traits of advanced poplars needs to be fully investigated to ensure that these do not unintentionally negate the cost savings indicated. CONCLUSIONS: Through these evaluations, we highlight the key bottlenecks within the bioethanol supply chain from the standpoint of various stakeholders. For producers, technologies that are best suited to the specific feedstock composition and national policies should be optimized. For policymakers, support schemes that benefit emerging bioethanol producers and allow renewable fuel to be economically competitive with petrol should be established. Finally, for researchers, better control over plant genetic engineering and advanced breeding and its consequential economic impact would bring valuable contributions towards developing an economically sustainable bioethanol market within the European Union.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4364105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43641052015-03-19 Bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the European Union Littlewood, Jade Guo, Miao Boerjan, Wout Murphy, Richard J Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: The European Union has made it a strategic objective to develop its biofuels market in order to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, to help mitigate climate change and to address energy insecurity within the transport sector. Despite targets set at national and supranational levels, lignocellulosic bioethanol production has yet to be widely commercialized in the European Union. Here, we use techno-economic modeling to compare the price of bioethanol produced from short rotation coppice (SRC) poplar feedstocks under two leading processing technologies in five European countries. RESULTS: Our evaluation shows that the type of processing technology and varying national costs between countries results in a wide range of bioethanol production prices (€0.275 to 0.727/l). The lowest production prices for bioethanol were found in countries that had cheap feedstock costs and high prices for renewable electricity. Taxes and other costs had a significant influence on fuel prices at the petrol station, and therefore the presence and amount of government support for bioethanol was a major factor determining the competitiveness of bioethanol with conventional fuel. In a forward-looking scenario, genetically engineering poplar with a reduced lignin content showed potential to enhance the competitiveness of bioethanol with conventional fuel by reducing overall costs by approximately 41% in four out of the five countries modeled. However, the possible wider phenotypic traits of advanced poplars needs to be fully investigated to ensure that these do not unintentionally negate the cost savings indicated. CONCLUSIONS: Through these evaluations, we highlight the key bottlenecks within the bioethanol supply chain from the standpoint of various stakeholders. For producers, technologies that are best suited to the specific feedstock composition and national policies should be optimized. For policymakers, support schemes that benefit emerging bioethanol producers and allow renewable fuel to be economically competitive with petrol should be established. Finally, for researchers, better control over plant genetic engineering and advanced breeding and its consequential economic impact would bring valuable contributions towards developing an economically sustainable bioethanol market within the European Union. BioMed Central 2014-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4364105/ /pubmed/25788978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-113 Text en © Littlewood et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Littlewood, Jade
Guo, Miao
Boerjan, Wout
Murphy, Richard J
Bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the European Union
title Bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the European Union
title_full Bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the European Union
title_fullStr Bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the European Union
title_full_unstemmed Bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the European Union
title_short Bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the European Union
title_sort bioethanol from poplar: a commercially viable alternative to fossil fuel in the european union
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25788978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-113
work_keys_str_mv AT littlewoodjade bioethanolfrompoplaracommerciallyviablealternativetofossilfuelintheeuropeanunion
AT guomiao bioethanolfrompoplaracommerciallyviablealternativetofossilfuelintheeuropeanunion
AT boerjanwout bioethanolfrompoplaracommerciallyviablealternativetofossilfuelintheeuropeanunion
AT murphyrichardj bioethanolfrompoplaracommerciallyviablealternativetofossilfuelintheeuropeanunion