Cargando…

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7

BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is one of the most employed screening instruments. Although there is a large research body investigating its psychometric properties, reliability and validity are not yet fully tested using modern techniques. Therefore, we investigate reliabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stone, Lisanne L, Janssens, Jan M A M, Vermulst, Ad A, Van Der Maten, Marloes, Engels, Rutger C M E, Otten, Roy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8
_version_ 1782362054140624896
author Stone, Lisanne L
Janssens, Jan M A M
Vermulst, Ad A
Van Der Maten, Marloes
Engels, Rutger C M E
Otten, Roy
author_facet Stone, Lisanne L
Janssens, Jan M A M
Vermulst, Ad A
Van Der Maten, Marloes
Engels, Rutger C M E
Otten, Roy
author_sort Stone, Lisanne L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is one of the most employed screening instruments. Although there is a large research body investigating its psychometric properties, reliability and validity are not yet fully tested using modern techniques. Therefore, we investigate reliability, construct validity, measurement invariance, and predictive validity of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7. Besides, we intend to replicate previous studies by investigating test-retest reliability and criterion validity. METHODS: In a Dutch community sample 2,238 teachers and 1,513 parents filled out questionnaires regarding problem behaviors and parenting, while 1,831 children reported on sociometric measures at T1. These children were followed-up during three consecutive years. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega, construct validity was examined by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and predictive validity was examined by calculating developmental profiles and linking these to measures of inadequate parenting, parenting stress and social preference. Further, mean scores and percentiles were examined in order to establish norms. RESULTS: Omega was consistently higher than alpha regarding reliability. The original five-factor structure was replicated, and measurement invariance was established on a configural level. Further, higher SDQ scores were associated with future indices of higher inadequate parenting, higher parenting stress and lower social preference. Finally, previous results on test-retest reliability and criterion validity were replicated. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to show SDQ scores are predictively valid, attesting to the feasibility of the SDQ as a screening instrument. Future research into predictive validity of the SDQ is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4364334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43643342015-03-26 The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 Stone, Lisanne L Janssens, Jan M A M Vermulst, Ad A Van Der Maten, Marloes Engels, Rutger C M E Otten, Roy BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is one of the most employed screening instruments. Although there is a large research body investigating its psychometric properties, reliability and validity are not yet fully tested using modern techniques. Therefore, we investigate reliability, construct validity, measurement invariance, and predictive validity of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7. Besides, we intend to replicate previous studies by investigating test-retest reliability and criterion validity. METHODS: In a Dutch community sample 2,238 teachers and 1,513 parents filled out questionnaires regarding problem behaviors and parenting, while 1,831 children reported on sociometric measures at T1. These children were followed-up during three consecutive years. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega, construct validity was examined by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and predictive validity was examined by calculating developmental profiles and linking these to measures of inadequate parenting, parenting stress and social preference. Further, mean scores and percentiles were examined in order to establish norms. RESULTS: Omega was consistently higher than alpha regarding reliability. The original five-factor structure was replicated, and measurement invariance was established on a configural level. Further, higher SDQ scores were associated with future indices of higher inadequate parenting, higher parenting stress and lower social preference. Finally, previous results on test-retest reliability and criterion validity were replicated. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to show SDQ scores are predictively valid, attesting to the feasibility of the SDQ as a screening instrument. Future research into predictive validity of the SDQ is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4364334/ /pubmed/25815194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8 Text en © Stone et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stone, Lisanne L
Janssens, Jan M A M
Vermulst, Ad A
Van Der Maten, Marloes
Engels, Rutger C M E
Otten, Roy
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7
title The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7
title_full The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7
title_fullStr The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7
title_full_unstemmed The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7
title_short The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7
title_sort strengths and difficulties questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8
work_keys_str_mv AT stonelisannel thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT janssensjanmam thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT vermulstada thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT vandermatenmarloes thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT engelsrutgercme thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT ottenroy thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT stonelisannel strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT janssensjanmam strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT vermulstada strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT vandermatenmarloes strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT engelsrutgercme strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47
AT ottenroy strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47