Cargando…
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7
BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is one of the most employed screening instruments. Although there is a large research body investigating its psychometric properties, reliability and validity are not yet fully tested using modern techniques. Therefore, we investigate reliabil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8 |
_version_ | 1782362054140624896 |
---|---|
author | Stone, Lisanne L Janssens, Jan M A M Vermulst, Ad A Van Der Maten, Marloes Engels, Rutger C M E Otten, Roy |
author_facet | Stone, Lisanne L Janssens, Jan M A M Vermulst, Ad A Van Der Maten, Marloes Engels, Rutger C M E Otten, Roy |
author_sort | Stone, Lisanne L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is one of the most employed screening instruments. Although there is a large research body investigating its psychometric properties, reliability and validity are not yet fully tested using modern techniques. Therefore, we investigate reliability, construct validity, measurement invariance, and predictive validity of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7. Besides, we intend to replicate previous studies by investigating test-retest reliability and criterion validity. METHODS: In a Dutch community sample 2,238 teachers and 1,513 parents filled out questionnaires regarding problem behaviors and parenting, while 1,831 children reported on sociometric measures at T1. These children were followed-up during three consecutive years. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega, construct validity was examined by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and predictive validity was examined by calculating developmental profiles and linking these to measures of inadequate parenting, parenting stress and social preference. Further, mean scores and percentiles were examined in order to establish norms. RESULTS: Omega was consistently higher than alpha regarding reliability. The original five-factor structure was replicated, and measurement invariance was established on a configural level. Further, higher SDQ scores were associated with future indices of higher inadequate parenting, higher parenting stress and lower social preference. Finally, previous results on test-retest reliability and criterion validity were replicated. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to show SDQ scores are predictively valid, attesting to the feasibility of the SDQ as a screening instrument. Future research into predictive validity of the SDQ is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4364334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43643342015-03-26 The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 Stone, Lisanne L Janssens, Jan M A M Vermulst, Ad A Van Der Maten, Marloes Engels, Rutger C M E Otten, Roy BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire is one of the most employed screening instruments. Although there is a large research body investigating its psychometric properties, reliability and validity are not yet fully tested using modern techniques. Therefore, we investigate reliability, construct validity, measurement invariance, and predictive validity of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7. Besides, we intend to replicate previous studies by investigating test-retest reliability and criterion validity. METHODS: In a Dutch community sample 2,238 teachers and 1,513 parents filled out questionnaires regarding problem behaviors and parenting, while 1,831 children reported on sociometric measures at T1. These children were followed-up during three consecutive years. Reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega, construct validity was examined by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and predictive validity was examined by calculating developmental profiles and linking these to measures of inadequate parenting, parenting stress and social preference. Further, mean scores and percentiles were examined in order to establish norms. RESULTS: Omega was consistently higher than alpha regarding reliability. The original five-factor structure was replicated, and measurement invariance was established on a configural level. Further, higher SDQ scores were associated with future indices of higher inadequate parenting, higher parenting stress and lower social preference. Finally, previous results on test-retest reliability and criterion validity were replicated. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to show SDQ scores are predictively valid, attesting to the feasibility of the SDQ as a screening instrument. Future research into predictive validity of the SDQ is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4364334/ /pubmed/25815194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8 Text en © Stone et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stone, Lisanne L Janssens, Jan M A M Vermulst, Ad A Van Der Maten, Marloes Engels, Rutger C M E Otten, Roy The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 |
title | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 |
title_full | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 |
title_fullStr | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 |
title_full_unstemmed | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 |
title_short | The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 |
title_sort | strengths and difficulties questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stonelisannel thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT janssensjanmam thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT vermulstada thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT vandermatenmarloes thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT engelsrutgercme thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT ottenroy thestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT stonelisannel strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT janssensjanmam strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT vermulstada strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT vandermatenmarloes strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT engelsrutgercme strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 AT ottenroy strengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesoftheparentandteacherversioninchildrenaged47 |