Cargando…

Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE: Radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunlop, Alex, Welsh, Liam, McQuaid, Dualta, Dean, Jamie, Gulliford, Sarah, Hansen, Vibeke, Bhide, Shreerang, Nutting, Chris, Harrington, Kevin, Newbold, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120141
_version_ 1782362080234438656
author Dunlop, Alex
Welsh, Liam
McQuaid, Dualta
Dean, Jamie
Gulliford, Sarah
Hansen, Vibeke
Bhide, Shreerang
Nutting, Chris
Harrington, Kevin
Newbold, Kate
author_facet Dunlop, Alex
Welsh, Liam
McQuaid, Dualta
Dean, Jamie
Gulliford, Sarah
Hansen, Vibeke
Bhide, Shreerang
Nutting, Chris
Harrington, Kevin
Newbold, Kate
author_sort Dunlop, Alex
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in determining NCF outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility of two alternative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to generate hippocampus- and brain-sparing HNC treatment plans to preserve NCF. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A planning study was undertaken for ten patients with HNC whose planning target volume (PTV) included the nasopharynx. Patients had been previously treated using standard (chemo)-IMRT techniques. Bilateral hippocampi were delineated according to the RTOG atlas, on T1w MRI co-registered to the RT planning CT. Hippocampus-sparing plans (HSRT), and whole-brain/hippocampus-sparing fixed-field non-coplanar IMRT (BSRT) plans, were generated. DVHs and dose difference maps were used to compare plans. NTCP calculations for NCF impairment, based on hippocampal dosimetry, were performed for all plans. RESULTS: Significant reductions in hippocampal doses relative to standard plans were achieved in eight of ten cases for both HSRT and BSRT. EQD2 D40% to bilateral hippocampi was significantly reduced from a mean of 23.5 Gy (range 14.5–35.0) in the standard plans to a mean of 8.6 Gy (4.2–24.7) for HSRT (p = 0.001) and a mean of 9.0 Gy (4.3–17.3) for BSRT (p < 0.001). Both HSRT and BSRT resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the whole brain, brain stem, and cerebellum. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that IMRT plans for HNC involving the nasopharynx can be successfully optimised to significantly reduce dose to the bilateral hippocampi and whole brain. The magnitude of the achievable dose reductions results in significant reductions in the probability of radiation-induced NCF decline. These results could readily be translated into a future clinical trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4364536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43645362015-03-23 Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer Dunlop, Alex Welsh, Liam McQuaid, Dualta Dean, Jamie Gulliford, Sarah Hansen, Vibeke Bhide, Shreerang Nutting, Chris Harrington, Kevin Newbold, Kate PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in determining NCF outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility of two alternative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to generate hippocampus- and brain-sparing HNC treatment plans to preserve NCF. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A planning study was undertaken for ten patients with HNC whose planning target volume (PTV) included the nasopharynx. Patients had been previously treated using standard (chemo)-IMRT techniques. Bilateral hippocampi were delineated according to the RTOG atlas, on T1w MRI co-registered to the RT planning CT. Hippocampus-sparing plans (HSRT), and whole-brain/hippocampus-sparing fixed-field non-coplanar IMRT (BSRT) plans, were generated. DVHs and dose difference maps were used to compare plans. NTCP calculations for NCF impairment, based on hippocampal dosimetry, were performed for all plans. RESULTS: Significant reductions in hippocampal doses relative to standard plans were achieved in eight of ten cases for both HSRT and BSRT. EQD2 D40% to bilateral hippocampi was significantly reduced from a mean of 23.5 Gy (range 14.5–35.0) in the standard plans to a mean of 8.6 Gy (4.2–24.7) for HSRT (p = 0.001) and a mean of 9.0 Gy (4.3–17.3) for BSRT (p < 0.001). Both HSRT and BSRT resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the whole brain, brain stem, and cerebellum. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that IMRT plans for HNC involving the nasopharynx can be successfully optimised to significantly reduce dose to the bilateral hippocampi and whole brain. The magnitude of the achievable dose reductions results in significant reductions in the probability of radiation-induced NCF decline. These results could readily be translated into a future clinical trial. Public Library of Science 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4364536/ /pubmed/25781636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120141 Text en © 2015 Dunlop et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dunlop, Alex
Welsh, Liam
McQuaid, Dualta
Dean, Jamie
Gulliford, Sarah
Hansen, Vibeke
Bhide, Shreerang
Nutting, Chris
Harrington, Kevin
Newbold, Kate
Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer
title Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer
title_full Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer
title_fullStr Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer
title_short Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer
title_sort brain-sparing methods for imrt of head and neck cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120141
work_keys_str_mv AT dunlopalex brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT welshliam brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT mcquaiddualta brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT deanjamie brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT gullifordsarah brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT hansenvibeke brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT bhideshreerang brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT nuttingchris brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT harringtonkevin brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT newboldkate brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer