Cargando…
Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer
PURPOSE: Radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120141 |
_version_ | 1782362080234438656 |
---|---|
author | Dunlop, Alex Welsh, Liam McQuaid, Dualta Dean, Jamie Gulliford, Sarah Hansen, Vibeke Bhide, Shreerang Nutting, Chris Harrington, Kevin Newbold, Kate |
author_facet | Dunlop, Alex Welsh, Liam McQuaid, Dualta Dean, Jamie Gulliford, Sarah Hansen, Vibeke Bhide, Shreerang Nutting, Chris Harrington, Kevin Newbold, Kate |
author_sort | Dunlop, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in determining NCF outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility of two alternative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to generate hippocampus- and brain-sparing HNC treatment plans to preserve NCF. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A planning study was undertaken for ten patients with HNC whose planning target volume (PTV) included the nasopharynx. Patients had been previously treated using standard (chemo)-IMRT techniques. Bilateral hippocampi were delineated according to the RTOG atlas, on T1w MRI co-registered to the RT planning CT. Hippocampus-sparing plans (HSRT), and whole-brain/hippocampus-sparing fixed-field non-coplanar IMRT (BSRT) plans, were generated. DVHs and dose difference maps were used to compare plans. NTCP calculations for NCF impairment, based on hippocampal dosimetry, were performed for all plans. RESULTS: Significant reductions in hippocampal doses relative to standard plans were achieved in eight of ten cases for both HSRT and BSRT. EQD2 D40% to bilateral hippocampi was significantly reduced from a mean of 23.5 Gy (range 14.5–35.0) in the standard plans to a mean of 8.6 Gy (4.2–24.7) for HSRT (p = 0.001) and a mean of 9.0 Gy (4.3–17.3) for BSRT (p < 0.001). Both HSRT and BSRT resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the whole brain, brain stem, and cerebellum. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that IMRT plans for HNC involving the nasopharynx can be successfully optimised to significantly reduce dose to the bilateral hippocampi and whole brain. The magnitude of the achievable dose reductions results in significant reductions in the probability of radiation-induced NCF decline. These results could readily be translated into a future clinical trial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4364536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43645362015-03-23 Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer Dunlop, Alex Welsh, Liam McQuaid, Dualta Dean, Jamie Gulliford, Sarah Hansen, Vibeke Bhide, Shreerang Nutting, Chris Harrington, Kevin Newbold, Kate PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in determining NCF outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility of two alternative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to generate hippocampus- and brain-sparing HNC treatment plans to preserve NCF. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A planning study was undertaken for ten patients with HNC whose planning target volume (PTV) included the nasopharynx. Patients had been previously treated using standard (chemo)-IMRT techniques. Bilateral hippocampi were delineated according to the RTOG atlas, on T1w MRI co-registered to the RT planning CT. Hippocampus-sparing plans (HSRT), and whole-brain/hippocampus-sparing fixed-field non-coplanar IMRT (BSRT) plans, were generated. DVHs and dose difference maps were used to compare plans. NTCP calculations for NCF impairment, based on hippocampal dosimetry, were performed for all plans. RESULTS: Significant reductions in hippocampal doses relative to standard plans were achieved in eight of ten cases for both HSRT and BSRT. EQD2 D40% to bilateral hippocampi was significantly reduced from a mean of 23.5 Gy (range 14.5–35.0) in the standard plans to a mean of 8.6 Gy (4.2–24.7) for HSRT (p = 0.001) and a mean of 9.0 Gy (4.3–17.3) for BSRT (p < 0.001). Both HSRT and BSRT resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the whole brain, brain stem, and cerebellum. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that IMRT plans for HNC involving the nasopharynx can be successfully optimised to significantly reduce dose to the bilateral hippocampi and whole brain. The magnitude of the achievable dose reductions results in significant reductions in the probability of radiation-induced NCF decline. These results could readily be translated into a future clinical trial. Public Library of Science 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4364536/ /pubmed/25781636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120141 Text en © 2015 Dunlop et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dunlop, Alex Welsh, Liam McQuaid, Dualta Dean, Jamie Gulliford, Sarah Hansen, Vibeke Bhide, Shreerang Nutting, Chris Harrington, Kevin Newbold, Kate Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer |
title | Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer |
title_full | Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer |
title_fullStr | Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer |
title_short | Brain-Sparing Methods for IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer |
title_sort | brain-sparing methods for imrt of head and neck cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25781636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dunlopalex brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT welshliam brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT mcquaiddualta brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT deanjamie brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT gullifordsarah brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT hansenvibeke brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT bhideshreerang brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT nuttingchris brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT harringtonkevin brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer AT newboldkate brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer |