Cargando…

Impact of Community Based Peer Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Individual and/or Group Approaches

BACKGROUND: Diabetes peer support, where one person with diabetes helps guide and support others, has been proposed as a way to improve diabetes management. We have tested whether different diabetes peer support strategies can improve metabolic and/or psychological outcomes. METHODS: People with typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simmons, David, Prevost, A. Toby, Bunn, Chris, Holman, Daniel, Parker, Richard A., Cohn, Simon, Donald, Sarah, Paddison, Charlotte A. M., Ward, Candice, Robins, Peter, Graffy, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120277
_version_ 1782362113760559104
author Simmons, David
Prevost, A. Toby
Bunn, Chris
Holman, Daniel
Parker, Richard A.
Cohn, Simon
Donald, Sarah
Paddison, Charlotte A. M.
Ward, Candice
Robins, Peter
Graffy, Jonathan
author_facet Simmons, David
Prevost, A. Toby
Bunn, Chris
Holman, Daniel
Parker, Richard A.
Cohn, Simon
Donald, Sarah
Paddison, Charlotte A. M.
Ward, Candice
Robins, Peter
Graffy, Jonathan
author_sort Simmons, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetes peer support, where one person with diabetes helps guide and support others, has been proposed as a way to improve diabetes management. We have tested whether different diabetes peer support strategies can improve metabolic and/or psychological outcomes. METHODS: People with type 2 diabetes (n = 1,299) were invited to participate as either ‘peer’ or ‘peer support facilitator’ (PSF) in a 2x2 factorial randomised cluster controlled trial across rural communities (130 clusters) in England. Peer support was delivered over 8–12 months by trained PSFs, supported by monthly meetings with a diabetes educator. Primary end point was HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, diabetes distress, blood pressure, waist, total cholesterol and weight. Outcome assessors and investigators were masked to arm allocation. Main factors were 1:1 or group intervention. Analysis was by intention-to-treat adjusting for baseline. RESULTS: The 4 arms were well matched (Group n = 330, 1:1(individual) n = 325, combined n = 322, control n = 322); 1035 (79•7%) completed the mid-point postal questionnaire and 1064 (81•9%) had a final HbA1c. A limitation was that although 92.6% PSFs and peers were in telephone contact, only 61.4% of intervention participants attended a face to face session. Mean baseline HbA1c was 57 mmol/mol (7•4%), with no significant change across arms. Follow up systolic blood pressure was 2•3mm Hg (0.6 to 4.0) lower among those allocated group peer-support and 3•0mm Hg (1.1 to 5.0) lower if the group support was attended at least once. There was no impact on other outcomes by intention to treat or significant differences between arms in self-reported adherence or medication. CONCLUSIONS: Group diabetes peer support over 8–12 months was associated with a small improvement in blood pressure but no other significant outcomes. Long term benefits should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com ISRCTN6696362166963621
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4364716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43647162015-03-23 Impact of Community Based Peer Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Individual and/or Group Approaches Simmons, David Prevost, A. Toby Bunn, Chris Holman, Daniel Parker, Richard A. Cohn, Simon Donald, Sarah Paddison, Charlotte A. M. Ward, Candice Robins, Peter Graffy, Jonathan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diabetes peer support, where one person with diabetes helps guide and support others, has been proposed as a way to improve diabetes management. We have tested whether different diabetes peer support strategies can improve metabolic and/or psychological outcomes. METHODS: People with type 2 diabetes (n = 1,299) were invited to participate as either ‘peer’ or ‘peer support facilitator’ (PSF) in a 2x2 factorial randomised cluster controlled trial across rural communities (130 clusters) in England. Peer support was delivered over 8–12 months by trained PSFs, supported by monthly meetings with a diabetes educator. Primary end point was HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, diabetes distress, blood pressure, waist, total cholesterol and weight. Outcome assessors and investigators were masked to arm allocation. Main factors were 1:1 or group intervention. Analysis was by intention-to-treat adjusting for baseline. RESULTS: The 4 arms were well matched (Group n = 330, 1:1(individual) n = 325, combined n = 322, control n = 322); 1035 (79•7%) completed the mid-point postal questionnaire and 1064 (81•9%) had a final HbA1c. A limitation was that although 92.6% PSFs and peers were in telephone contact, only 61.4% of intervention participants attended a face to face session. Mean baseline HbA1c was 57 mmol/mol (7•4%), with no significant change across arms. Follow up systolic blood pressure was 2•3mm Hg (0.6 to 4.0) lower among those allocated group peer-support and 3•0mm Hg (1.1 to 5.0) lower if the group support was attended at least once. There was no impact on other outcomes by intention to treat or significant differences between arms in self-reported adherence or medication. CONCLUSIONS: Group diabetes peer support over 8–12 months was associated with a small improvement in blood pressure but no other significant outcomes. Long term benefits should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com ISRCTN6696362166963621 Public Library of Science 2015-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4364716/ /pubmed/25785452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120277 Text en © 2015 Simmons et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Simmons, David
Prevost, A. Toby
Bunn, Chris
Holman, Daniel
Parker, Richard A.
Cohn, Simon
Donald, Sarah
Paddison, Charlotte A. M.
Ward, Candice
Robins, Peter
Graffy, Jonathan
Impact of Community Based Peer Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Individual and/or Group Approaches
title Impact of Community Based Peer Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Individual and/or Group Approaches
title_full Impact of Community Based Peer Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Individual and/or Group Approaches
title_fullStr Impact of Community Based Peer Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Individual and/or Group Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Community Based Peer Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Individual and/or Group Approaches
title_short Impact of Community Based Peer Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Individual and/or Group Approaches
title_sort impact of community based peer support in type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial of individual and/or group approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120277
work_keys_str_mv AT simmonsdavid impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT prevostatoby impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT bunnchris impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT holmandaniel impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT parkerricharda impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT cohnsimon impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT donaldsarah impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT paddisoncharlotteam impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT wardcandice impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT robinspeter impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches
AT graffyjonathan impactofcommunitybasedpeersupportintype2diabetesaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofindividualandorgroupapproaches