Cargando…
Comparison of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently, acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been defined differently by Asia–Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) and Chinese Medical Association (CMA) in the East, as well as EASL-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) Consortium in the West. This study ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122158 |
_version_ | 1782362115997171712 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Qian Li, Ying Han, Tao Nie, CaiYun Cai, JunJun Liu, Hua Liu, Ying |
author_facet | Zhang, Qian Li, Ying Han, Tao Nie, CaiYun Cai, JunJun Liu, Hua Liu, Ying |
author_sort | Zhang, Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently, acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been defined differently by Asia–Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) and Chinese Medical Association (CMA) in the East, as well as EASL-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) Consortium in the West. This study aimed to compare current different diagnostic criteria for ACLF and to determine predictors of the progression into post-enrollment EASL-CLIF ACLF from ACLF at enrollment defined by APASL alone or by both APASL and CMA but not by EASL-CLIF Consortium. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 394 eligible cirrhotic patients fulfilling at least APASL criteria for ACLF at enrollment. Patient survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and subsequently compared by log-rank test. Independent predictors of disease progression were determined using univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality rate was 13.1% in patients with ACLF at enrollment defined by APASL alone, 25.3% in patients with ACLF at enrollment defined by both APASL and CMA but not EASL-CLIF Consortium, and 59.3% in patients with ACLF at enrollment defined by EASL-CLIF Consortium in addition to APASL. Baseline Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score, and the maximum rising rates of CLIF-SOFA score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score and total bilirubin were independent predictors of progression into post-enrollment EASL-CLIF ACLF from ACLF at enrollment defined by APASL alone or by both APASL and CMA but not by EASL-CLIF Consortium. CONCLUSION: Different diagnostic criteria for ACLF caused different patient prognosis. So, it is imperative to formulate a unifying diagnostic criteria for ACLF worldwide, thus attaining early identification and treatment, and eventual improvement in survival of ACLF patients. Baseline CLIF-SOFA score, and the maximum rising rates of CLIF-SOFA score, MELD-Na score and total bilirubin may early predict post-enrollment development of EASL-CLIF ACLF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4364726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43647262015-03-23 Comparison of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure Zhang, Qian Li, Ying Han, Tao Nie, CaiYun Cai, JunJun Liu, Hua Liu, Ying PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently, acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has been defined differently by Asia–Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) and Chinese Medical Association (CMA) in the East, as well as EASL-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) Consortium in the West. This study aimed to compare current different diagnostic criteria for ACLF and to determine predictors of the progression into post-enrollment EASL-CLIF ACLF from ACLF at enrollment defined by APASL alone or by both APASL and CMA but not by EASL-CLIF Consortium. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 394 eligible cirrhotic patients fulfilling at least APASL criteria for ACLF at enrollment. Patient survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and subsequently compared by log-rank test. Independent predictors of disease progression were determined using univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality rate was 13.1% in patients with ACLF at enrollment defined by APASL alone, 25.3% in patients with ACLF at enrollment defined by both APASL and CMA but not EASL-CLIF Consortium, and 59.3% in patients with ACLF at enrollment defined by EASL-CLIF Consortium in addition to APASL. Baseline Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score, and the maximum rising rates of CLIF-SOFA score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score and total bilirubin were independent predictors of progression into post-enrollment EASL-CLIF ACLF from ACLF at enrollment defined by APASL alone or by both APASL and CMA but not by EASL-CLIF Consortium. CONCLUSION: Different diagnostic criteria for ACLF caused different patient prognosis. So, it is imperative to formulate a unifying diagnostic criteria for ACLF worldwide, thus attaining early identification and treatment, and eventual improvement in survival of ACLF patients. Baseline CLIF-SOFA score, and the maximum rising rates of CLIF-SOFA score, MELD-Na score and total bilirubin may early predict post-enrollment development of EASL-CLIF ACLF. Public Library of Science 2015-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4364726/ /pubmed/25785855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122158 Text en © 2015 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Qian Li, Ying Han, Tao Nie, CaiYun Cai, JunJun Liu, Hua Liu, Ying Comparison of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure |
title | Comparison of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure |
title_full | Comparison of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure |
title_short | Comparison of Current Diagnostic Criteria for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure |
title_sort | comparison of current diagnostic criteria for acute-on-chronic liver failure |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangqian comparisonofcurrentdiagnosticcriteriaforacuteonchronicliverfailure AT liying comparisonofcurrentdiagnosticcriteriaforacuteonchronicliverfailure AT hantao comparisonofcurrentdiagnosticcriteriaforacuteonchronicliverfailure AT niecaiyun comparisonofcurrentdiagnosticcriteriaforacuteonchronicliverfailure AT caijunjun comparisonofcurrentdiagnosticcriteriaforacuteonchronicliverfailure AT liuhua comparisonofcurrentdiagnosticcriteriaforacuteonchronicliverfailure AT liuying comparisonofcurrentdiagnosticcriteriaforacuteonchronicliverfailure |