Cargando…

Scientific and Regulatory Standards for Assessing Product Performance Using the Similarity Factor, f2

The similarity factor, f2, measures the sameness of dissolution profiles. The following commentary is an overview of discussions and presentations from a group of industry and US regulatory experts that have integrated the science and regulatory research and practice for assessing product performanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, Ruth E., Gray, Vivian, Dorantes, Angelica, Gold, Lynn, Pham, Loan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25669756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-015-9723-y
_version_ 1782362180929191936
author Stevens, Ruth E.
Gray, Vivian
Dorantes, Angelica
Gold, Lynn
Pham, Loan
author_facet Stevens, Ruth E.
Gray, Vivian
Dorantes, Angelica
Gold, Lynn
Pham, Loan
author_sort Stevens, Ruth E.
collection PubMed
description The similarity factor, f2, measures the sameness of dissolution profiles. The following commentary is an overview of discussions and presentations from a group of industry and US regulatory experts that have integrated the science and regulatory research and practice for assessing product performance, particularly for modified-release (MR) dosage forms, using f2. For a drug development sponsor or applicant with an orally complex dosage formulation, it is critical to understand dissolution methods and the similarity factor and how and/or when to apply it in their NDA, ANDA, or PMA submission. As part of any regulatory submission, it is critical to justify that the product performance has not been impacted by any change in the manufacturing process and/or the delayed and/or prolonged drug release characteristics compared to a similar conventional or another orally complex dosage form. The purposes of this document are (1) to provide a description of appropriate dissolution methods, how is the f2 calculated and how it can be used to justify product performance similarity, or not; (2) to provide an overview of alternative methods available for dissolution profile comparisons, and (3) to illustrate how applying these concepts in a focused way supports approval of submissions and regulatory dossiers and aligns them with on-going science and regulatory initiatives. A case study will be used as an example to demonstrate how dissolution testing and the f2 calculation results can impact regulatory outcomes from an NDA (505(b)(1)), NDA (505(b)(2)), ANDA (505(j)), supplemental NDAs/ANDAs, or PMA perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43650942015-03-25 Scientific and Regulatory Standards for Assessing Product Performance Using the Similarity Factor, f2 Stevens, Ruth E. Gray, Vivian Dorantes, Angelica Gold, Lynn Pham, Loan AAPS J Commentary The similarity factor, f2, measures the sameness of dissolution profiles. The following commentary is an overview of discussions and presentations from a group of industry and US regulatory experts that have integrated the science and regulatory research and practice for assessing product performance, particularly for modified-release (MR) dosage forms, using f2. For a drug development sponsor or applicant with an orally complex dosage formulation, it is critical to understand dissolution methods and the similarity factor and how and/or when to apply it in their NDA, ANDA, or PMA submission. As part of any regulatory submission, it is critical to justify that the product performance has not been impacted by any change in the manufacturing process and/or the delayed and/or prolonged drug release characteristics compared to a similar conventional or another orally complex dosage form. The purposes of this document are (1) to provide a description of appropriate dissolution methods, how is the f2 calculated and how it can be used to justify product performance similarity, or not; (2) to provide an overview of alternative methods available for dissolution profile comparisons, and (3) to illustrate how applying these concepts in a focused way supports approval of submissions and regulatory dossiers and aligns them with on-going science and regulatory initiatives. A case study will be used as an example to demonstrate how dissolution testing and the f2 calculation results can impact regulatory outcomes from an NDA (505(b)(1)), NDA (505(b)(2)), ANDA (505(j)), supplemental NDAs/ANDAs, or PMA perspective. Springer US 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4365094/ /pubmed/25669756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-015-9723-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Stevens, Ruth E.
Gray, Vivian
Dorantes, Angelica
Gold, Lynn
Pham, Loan
Scientific and Regulatory Standards for Assessing Product Performance Using the Similarity Factor, f2
title Scientific and Regulatory Standards for Assessing Product Performance Using the Similarity Factor, f2
title_full Scientific and Regulatory Standards for Assessing Product Performance Using the Similarity Factor, f2
title_fullStr Scientific and Regulatory Standards for Assessing Product Performance Using the Similarity Factor, f2
title_full_unstemmed Scientific and Regulatory Standards for Assessing Product Performance Using the Similarity Factor, f2
title_short Scientific and Regulatory Standards for Assessing Product Performance Using the Similarity Factor, f2
title_sort scientific and regulatory standards for assessing product performance using the similarity factor, f2
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25669756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-015-9723-y
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensruthe scientificandregulatorystandardsforassessingproductperformanceusingthesimilarityfactorf2
AT grayvivian scientificandregulatorystandardsforassessingproductperformanceusingthesimilarityfactorf2
AT dorantesangelica scientificandregulatorystandardsforassessingproductperformanceusingthesimilarityfactorf2
AT goldlynn scientificandregulatorystandardsforassessingproductperformanceusingthesimilarityfactorf2
AT phamloan scientificandregulatorystandardsforassessingproductperformanceusingthesimilarityfactorf2