Cargando…

Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis

BACKGROUND: Conventional (rigid) fusion instrumentation is believed to accelerate the degeneration of adjacent discs by increasing stresses caused by motion discontinuity. Fusion instrumentation that employs reduced rod stiffness and increased axial motion, or dynamic instrumentation, may partially...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castellvi, Antonio E., Huang, Hao, Vestgaarden, Tov, Saigal, Sunil, Clabeaux, Deborah H., Pienkowski, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: RRY Publications, LLC 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2007-0004-RR
_version_ 1782362242871721984
author Castellvi, Antonio E.
Huang, Hao
Vestgaarden, Tov
Saigal, Sunil
Clabeaux, Deborah H.
Pienkowski, David
author_facet Castellvi, Antonio E.
Huang, Hao
Vestgaarden, Tov
Saigal, Sunil
Clabeaux, Deborah H.
Pienkowski, David
author_sort Castellvi, Antonio E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventional (rigid) fusion instrumentation is believed to accelerate the degeneration of adjacent discs by increasing stresses caused by motion discontinuity. Fusion instrumentation that employs reduced rod stiffness and increased axial motion, or dynamic instrumentation, may partially alleviate this problem, but the effects of this instrumentation on the stresses in the adjacent disc are unknown. We used a finiteelement model to calculate and compare the stresses in the adjacent-level disc that are induced by rigid and dynamic posterior lumbar fusion instrumentation. METHODS: A 3-dimensional finite-element model of the lumbar spine was obtained that simulated flexion and extension. The L5–S1 segment of this model was fused, and the L4–L5 segment was fixed with rigid or dynamic instrumentation. The mechanical properties of the dynamic instrumentation were determined by laboratory testing and then used in the finite-element model. Peak stresses in the lumbar discs were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The reduced-stiffness component of the dynamic instrumentation was associated with a 1% to 2% reduction in peak compressive stresses in the adjacent-level disc (at 45° flexion), and the increased axial motion component of this instrumentation reduced peak disc stress by 8% to 9%. Areas of disc tissue exposed to 80% of peak stresses of 6.17 MPa were 47% less for discs adjacent to dynamic instrumentation than for those adjacent to rigid instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced stiffness and increased axial motion of dynamic posterior lumbar fusion instrumentation designs result in an approximately 10% cumulative stress reduction for each flexion cycle. The effect of this stress reduction over many cycles may be substantial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cumulative effect of this reduced amplitude and distribution of peak stresses in the adjacent disc may partially alleviate the problem of adjacent-level disc degeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher RRY Publications, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43655752015-03-23 Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis Castellvi, Antonio E. Huang, Hao Vestgaarden, Tov Saigal, Sunil Clabeaux, Deborah H. Pienkowski, David SAS J Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Conventional (rigid) fusion instrumentation is believed to accelerate the degeneration of adjacent discs by increasing stresses caused by motion discontinuity. Fusion instrumentation that employs reduced rod stiffness and increased axial motion, or dynamic instrumentation, may partially alleviate this problem, but the effects of this instrumentation on the stresses in the adjacent disc are unknown. We used a finiteelement model to calculate and compare the stresses in the adjacent-level disc that are induced by rigid and dynamic posterior lumbar fusion instrumentation. METHODS: A 3-dimensional finite-element model of the lumbar spine was obtained that simulated flexion and extension. The L5–S1 segment of this model was fused, and the L4–L5 segment was fixed with rigid or dynamic instrumentation. The mechanical properties of the dynamic instrumentation were determined by laboratory testing and then used in the finite-element model. Peak stresses in the lumbar discs were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The reduced-stiffness component of the dynamic instrumentation was associated with a 1% to 2% reduction in peak compressive stresses in the adjacent-level disc (at 45° flexion), and the increased axial motion component of this instrumentation reduced peak disc stress by 8% to 9%. Areas of disc tissue exposed to 80% of peak stresses of 6.17 MPa were 47% less for discs adjacent to dynamic instrumentation than for those adjacent to rigid instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced stiffness and increased axial motion of dynamic posterior lumbar fusion instrumentation designs result in an approximately 10% cumulative stress reduction for each flexion cycle. The effect of this stress reduction over many cycles may be substantial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cumulative effect of this reduced amplitude and distribution of peak stresses in the adjacent disc may partially alleviate the problem of adjacent-level disc degeneration. RRY Publications, LLC 2007-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365575/ /pubmed/25802582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2007-0004-RR Text en Copyright SAS - Spine Arthroplasty Society 2007 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Castellvi, Antonio E.
Huang, Hao
Vestgaarden, Tov
Saigal, Sunil
Clabeaux, Deborah H.
Pienkowski, David
Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis
title Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis
title_full Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis
title_short Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis
title_sort stress reduction in adjacent level discs via dynamic instrumentation: a finite element analysis
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2007-0004-RR
work_keys_str_mv AT castellviantonioe stressreductioninadjacentleveldiscsviadynamicinstrumentationafiniteelementanalysis
AT huanghao stressreductioninadjacentleveldiscsviadynamicinstrumentationafiniteelementanalysis
AT vestgaardentov stressreductioninadjacentleveldiscsviadynamicinstrumentationafiniteelementanalysis
AT saigalsunil stressreductioninadjacentleveldiscsviadynamicinstrumentationafiniteelementanalysis
AT clabeauxdeborahh stressreductioninadjacentleveldiscsviadynamicinstrumentationafiniteelementanalysis
AT pienkowskidavid stressreductioninadjacentleveldiscsviadynamicinstrumentationafiniteelementanalysis