Cargando…
Benefits of the Paraspinal Muscle-Sparing Approach Versus the Conventional Midline Approach for Posterior Nonfusion Stabilization: Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Functional Outcomes
BACKGROUND: The influence of approach on outcomes of posterior nonfusion stabilization has not been described. This paper analyzes the influence of surgical approach on functional outcome with nonfusion stabilization. METHODS: We performed a prospective consecutive cohort outcome analysis of 88 pati...
Autores principales: | Anand, Neel, Baron, Eli M., Bray, Robert S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
RRY Publications, LLC
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2007-0101-RR |
Ejemplares similares
-
Modified Muscle-Sparing Paraspinal Approach for Stabilization and Interlaminar Decompression: A Minimally Invasive Technique for Pedicle Screw-Based Posterior Nonfusion Stabilization
por: Anand, Neel, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Role of Dynesys as Pedicle-Based Nonfusion Stabilization for Degenerative Disc Disorders
por: Anand, Neel, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The effect of minimally invasive posterior cervical approaches versus open anterior approaches on neck pain and disability
por: Steinberg, Jeffrey A., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Subscapular sparing approach for total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
por: Daher, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Postoperative Changes in Paraspinal Muscle Volume: Comparison between Paramedian Interfascial and Midline Approaches for Lumbar Fusion
por: Hyun, Seung Jae, et al.
Publicado: (2007)