Cargando…
Twenty-four month follow-up for reporting results of spinal implant studies: Is this guideline supported by the literature?
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, spine societies and journals have set guidelines requiring a minimum 24-month follow-up for reporting results of surgical implant studies. However, the basis for this particular time period is not clear. The purpose of this study was to analyze prospective spinal implant s...
Autores principales: | Ohnmeiss, Donna D., Guyer, Richard D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier, Inc.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.003 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement
por: Rainey, Scott, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration–regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up
por: Lauryssen, Carl, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Minimally invasive trans-sacral approach to L5-S1 interbody fusion: Preliminary results from 1 center and review of the literature
por: Bradley, W. Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Two- to 3-Year Follow-Up of ProDisc-L: Results From a Prospective Randomized Trial of Arthroplasty Versus Fusion
por: Zigler, Jack E., et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
The First 18 Months Following Food and Drug Administration Approval of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement in the United States: Reported Adverse Events Outside an Investigational Device Exemption Study Environment
por: Blumenthal, Scott L., et al.
Publicado: (2007)