Cargando…

Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement

BACKGROUND: Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis. METHODS: This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habib, Mohamed, Serhan, Hassan, Marchek, Connie, Baroud, Gamal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier, Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001
_version_ 1782362251000283136
author Habib, Mohamed
Serhan, Hassan
Marchek, Connie
Baroud, Gamal
author_facet Habib, Mohamed
Serhan, Hassan
Marchek, Connie
Baroud, Gamal
author_sort Habib, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis. METHODS: This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems (Confidence and Vertebroplastic; DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA). The Confidence system with the high viscosity cement has been recently introduced in an attempt to curtail cement leakage. RESULTS: The comparison was performed using an established benchmark model wherein the cement leakage, filling behavior can be assessed. A double-conduit introducer needle was used to deliver the cement and to measure the intravertebral pressure while delivering the cement. There were 5 experimental groups in this study: 3 low-viscosity groups, whose cement was injected at 3.5, 6.5, and 9.5 minutes after admixing the powder and monomer, and 2 high-viscosity groups injected at 3.5 and 6.5 minutes. The mass of leaked cement generally decreased with delaying the start of the injection. Specifically, for the low-viscosity, the average smallest leakage mass obtained was 2.6 ± 1.2g when the cement was delivered at 9.5 minutes. If delivered after 3.5 minutes, the mass of cement leak was 4.0 ± 1.2g. The high-viscosity system has showed improved results in curtailing cement leakage, as compared to low-viscosity. Specifically, if injected after 3.5 and 6.5 minutes, the cement leakage amounts were 1.5 ± 1.2g and 0.92 ± 0.6g, respectively. Similarly, the uniformity of cement filling increased when the delivery was delayed and when the high-viscosity system was applied. Furthermore, there were no significance changes in the intravertebral pressures between the low- and high-viscous groups. No correlation between the leakage mass and the IV pressures was noted. CONCLUSION: The cement thickness and timing of delivery are key in controlling the intravertebral cement filling and physician may want to explore the use of low- or high-viscous cement for different fractures. The thickness of the cement has no significant impact on the intravertebral pressures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Elsevier, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43656102015-03-23 Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement Habib, Mohamed Serhan, Hassan Marchek, Connie Baroud, Gamal SAS J New Technology BACKGROUND: Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis. METHODS: This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems (Confidence and Vertebroplastic; DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA). The Confidence system with the high viscosity cement has been recently introduced in an attempt to curtail cement leakage. RESULTS: The comparison was performed using an established benchmark model wherein the cement leakage, filling behavior can be assessed. A double-conduit introducer needle was used to deliver the cement and to measure the intravertebral pressure while delivering the cement. There were 5 experimental groups in this study: 3 low-viscosity groups, whose cement was injected at 3.5, 6.5, and 9.5 minutes after admixing the powder and monomer, and 2 high-viscosity groups injected at 3.5 and 6.5 minutes. The mass of leaked cement generally decreased with delaying the start of the injection. Specifically, for the low-viscosity, the average smallest leakage mass obtained was 2.6 ± 1.2g when the cement was delivered at 9.5 minutes. If delivered after 3.5 minutes, the mass of cement leak was 4.0 ± 1.2g. The high-viscosity system has showed improved results in curtailing cement leakage, as compared to low-viscosity. Specifically, if injected after 3.5 and 6.5 minutes, the cement leakage amounts were 1.5 ± 1.2g and 0.92 ± 0.6g, respectively. Similarly, the uniformity of cement filling increased when the delivery was delayed and when the high-viscosity system was applied. Furthermore, there were no significance changes in the intravertebral pressures between the low- and high-viscous groups. No correlation between the leakage mass and the IV pressures was noted. CONCLUSION: The cement thickness and timing of delivery are key in controlling the intravertebral cement filling and physician may want to explore the use of low- or high-viscous cement for different fractures. The thickness of the cement has no significant impact on the intravertebral pressures. Elsevier, Inc. 2010-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365610/ /pubmed/25802646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001 Text en © 2010 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle New Technology
Habib, Mohamed
Serhan, Hassan
Marchek, Connie
Baroud, Gamal
Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement
title Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement
title_full Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement
title_fullStr Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement
title_full_unstemmed Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement
title_short Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement
title_sort cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement
topic New Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT habibmohamed cementleakageandfillingpatternstudyoflowviscousvertebroplasticversushighviscousconfidencecement
AT serhanhassan cementleakageandfillingpatternstudyoflowviscousvertebroplasticversushighviscousconfidencecement
AT marchekconnie cementleakageandfillingpatternstudyoflowviscousvertebroplasticversushighviscousconfidencecement
AT baroudgamal cementleakageandfillingpatternstudyoflowviscousvertebroplasticversushighviscousconfidencecement