Cargando…
Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement
BACKGROUND: Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis. METHODS: This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier, Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001 |
_version_ | 1782362251000283136 |
---|---|
author | Habib, Mohamed Serhan, Hassan Marchek, Connie Baroud, Gamal |
author_facet | Habib, Mohamed Serhan, Hassan Marchek, Connie Baroud, Gamal |
author_sort | Habib, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis. METHODS: This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems (Confidence and Vertebroplastic; DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA). The Confidence system with the high viscosity cement has been recently introduced in an attempt to curtail cement leakage. RESULTS: The comparison was performed using an established benchmark model wherein the cement leakage, filling behavior can be assessed. A double-conduit introducer needle was used to deliver the cement and to measure the intravertebral pressure while delivering the cement. There were 5 experimental groups in this study: 3 low-viscosity groups, whose cement was injected at 3.5, 6.5, and 9.5 minutes after admixing the powder and monomer, and 2 high-viscosity groups injected at 3.5 and 6.5 minutes. The mass of leaked cement generally decreased with delaying the start of the injection. Specifically, for the low-viscosity, the average smallest leakage mass obtained was 2.6 ± 1.2g when the cement was delivered at 9.5 minutes. If delivered after 3.5 minutes, the mass of cement leak was 4.0 ± 1.2g. The high-viscosity system has showed improved results in curtailing cement leakage, as compared to low-viscosity. Specifically, if injected after 3.5 and 6.5 minutes, the cement leakage amounts were 1.5 ± 1.2g and 0.92 ± 0.6g, respectively. Similarly, the uniformity of cement filling increased when the delivery was delayed and when the high-viscosity system was applied. Furthermore, there were no significance changes in the intravertebral pressures between the low- and high-viscous groups. No correlation between the leakage mass and the IV pressures was noted. CONCLUSION: The cement thickness and timing of delivery are key in controlling the intravertebral cement filling and physician may want to explore the use of low- or high-viscous cement for different fractures. The thickness of the cement has no significant impact on the intravertebral pressures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4365610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Elsevier, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43656102015-03-23 Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement Habib, Mohamed Serhan, Hassan Marchek, Connie Baroud, Gamal SAS J New Technology BACKGROUND: Vertebral augmentation has recently evolved as a medical procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, the most common type of skeletal fractures related to osteoporosis. METHODS: This study compared the cement leakage and filling behavior of 2 existing delivery systems (Confidence and Vertebroplastic; DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA). The Confidence system with the high viscosity cement has been recently introduced in an attempt to curtail cement leakage. RESULTS: The comparison was performed using an established benchmark model wherein the cement leakage, filling behavior can be assessed. A double-conduit introducer needle was used to deliver the cement and to measure the intravertebral pressure while delivering the cement. There were 5 experimental groups in this study: 3 low-viscosity groups, whose cement was injected at 3.5, 6.5, and 9.5 minutes after admixing the powder and monomer, and 2 high-viscosity groups injected at 3.5 and 6.5 minutes. The mass of leaked cement generally decreased with delaying the start of the injection. Specifically, for the low-viscosity, the average smallest leakage mass obtained was 2.6 ± 1.2g when the cement was delivered at 9.5 minutes. If delivered after 3.5 minutes, the mass of cement leak was 4.0 ± 1.2g. The high-viscosity system has showed improved results in curtailing cement leakage, as compared to low-viscosity. Specifically, if injected after 3.5 and 6.5 minutes, the cement leakage amounts were 1.5 ± 1.2g and 0.92 ± 0.6g, respectively. Similarly, the uniformity of cement filling increased when the delivery was delayed and when the high-viscosity system was applied. Furthermore, there were no significance changes in the intravertebral pressures between the low- and high-viscous groups. No correlation between the leakage mass and the IV pressures was noted. CONCLUSION: The cement thickness and timing of delivery are key in controlling the intravertebral cement filling and physician may want to explore the use of low- or high-viscous cement for different fractures. The thickness of the cement has no significant impact on the intravertebral pressures. Elsevier, Inc. 2010-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365610/ /pubmed/25802646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001 Text en © 2010 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | New Technology Habib, Mohamed Serhan, Hassan Marchek, Connie Baroud, Gamal Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement |
title | Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement |
title_full | Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement |
title_fullStr | Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement |
title_full_unstemmed | Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement |
title_short | Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement |
title_sort | cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement |
topic | New Technology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habibmohamed cementleakageandfillingpatternstudyoflowviscousvertebroplasticversushighviscousconfidencecement AT serhanhassan cementleakageandfillingpatternstudyoflowviscousvertebroplasticversushighviscousconfidencecement AT marchekconnie cementleakageandfillingpatternstudyoflowviscousvertebroplasticversushighviscousconfidencecement AT baroudgamal cementleakageandfillingpatternstudyoflowviscousvertebroplasticversushighviscousconfidencecement |