Cargando…

Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography

BACKGROUND: Less invasive fusion approaches, such as extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), have proliferated, but few reports have critically assessed fusion rates. To date, no studies have reported computed tomography (CT) documented fusion rates following XLIF. METHODS: An institutional review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodgers, W. B., Gerber, Edward J., Patterson, Jamie R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier, Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.001
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Less invasive fusion approaches, such as extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), have proliferated, but few reports have critically assessed fusion rates. To date, no studies have reported computed tomography (CT) documented fusion rates following XLIF. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved prospective radiographic and CT assessment of minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini-ALIF) fusions performed through the XLIF approach. Sixty-six patients (88 operative levels) were examined 12 months after XLIF to determine the rate and quality of anterior lumbar fusion. RESULTS: Eighty five of the 88 levels (96.6%) were judged fused by CT. Sixty-four of the 66 patients (97.0%) were judged fused by CT. Patient satisfaction at 12 months after surgery was high, with 89.4% reportedly “satisfied or very satisfied” with their results. No revisions were necessary for pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSION: Mini-ALIF using an XLIF approach reliably results in anterior lumbar fusion.