Cargando…
Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography
BACKGROUND: Less invasive fusion approaches, such as extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), have proliferated, but few reports have critically assessed fusion rates. To date, no studies have reported computed tomography (CT) documented fusion rates following XLIF. METHODS: An institutional review...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier, Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.001 |
_version_ | 1782362251230969856 |
---|---|
author | Rodgers, W. B. Gerber, Edward J. Patterson, Jamie R. |
author_facet | Rodgers, W. B. Gerber, Edward J. Patterson, Jamie R. |
author_sort | Rodgers, W. B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Less invasive fusion approaches, such as extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), have proliferated, but few reports have critically assessed fusion rates. To date, no studies have reported computed tomography (CT) documented fusion rates following XLIF. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved prospective radiographic and CT assessment of minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini-ALIF) fusions performed through the XLIF approach. Sixty-six patients (88 operative levels) were examined 12 months after XLIF to determine the rate and quality of anterior lumbar fusion. RESULTS: Eighty five of the 88 levels (96.6%) were judged fused by CT. Sixty-four of the 66 patients (97.0%) were judged fused by CT. Patient satisfaction at 12 months after surgery was high, with 89.4% reportedly “satisfied or very satisfied” with their results. No revisions were necessary for pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSION: Mini-ALIF using an XLIF approach reliably results in anterior lumbar fusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4365611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Elsevier, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43656112015-03-23 Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography Rodgers, W. B. Gerber, Edward J. Patterson, Jamie R. SAS J Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Less invasive fusion approaches, such as extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), have proliferated, but few reports have critically assessed fusion rates. To date, no studies have reported computed tomography (CT) documented fusion rates following XLIF. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved prospective radiographic and CT assessment of minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini-ALIF) fusions performed through the XLIF approach. Sixty-six patients (88 operative levels) were examined 12 months after XLIF to determine the rate and quality of anterior lumbar fusion. RESULTS: Eighty five of the 88 levels (96.6%) were judged fused by CT. Sixty-four of the 66 patients (97.0%) were judged fused by CT. Patient satisfaction at 12 months after surgery was high, with 89.4% reportedly “satisfied or very satisfied” with their results. No revisions were necessary for pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSION: Mini-ALIF using an XLIF approach reliably results in anterior lumbar fusion. Elsevier, Inc. 2010-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365611/ /pubmed/25802651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.001 Text en © 2010 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Length Article Rodgers, W. B. Gerber, Edward J. Patterson, Jamie R. Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography |
title | Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography |
title_full | Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography |
title_short | Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography |
title_sort | fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography |
topic | Full Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodgerswb fusionafterminimallydisruptiveanteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanalysisofextremelateralinterbodyfusionbycomputedtomography AT gerberedwardj fusionafterminimallydisruptiveanteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanalysisofextremelateralinterbodyfusionbycomputedtomography AT pattersonjamier fusionafterminimallydisruptiveanteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionanalysisofextremelateralinterbodyfusionbycomputedtomography |