Cargando…
Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up
BACKGROUND: The presacral retroperitoneal approach to an axial lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique for interbody fusion at L5-S1 that has not been extensively studied, particularly with respect to long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The authors describe clinical...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier, Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.003 |
_version_ | 1782362251918835712 |
---|---|
author | Bohinski, Robert J. Jain, Viral V. Tobler, William D. |
author_facet | Bohinski, Robert J. Jain, Viral V. Tobler, William D. |
author_sort | Bohinski, Robert J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The presacral retroperitoneal approach to an axial lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique for interbody fusion at L5-S1 that has not been extensively studied, particularly with respect to long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The authors describe clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1-year follow-up for 50 consecutive patients who underwent the presacral ALIF. METHODS: Our patients included 24 males and 26 females who underwent the presacral ALIF procedure for interbody fusion at L5-S1. Indications included mechanical back pain and radiculopathy. Thirty-seven patients had disc degeneration at L5-S1, 7 had previously undergone a discectomy, and 6 had spondylolisthesis. A 2-level L4-S1 fusion was performed with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5 in 15 patients. AxiaLIF was performed as a stand-alone procedure in 5 patients and supplemented with pedicle screws in 45 patients. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were evaluated and complications were tracked. Fusion was evaluated by an independent neuro-radiologist. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, VAS and ODI scores had significantly improved by 49% and 50%, respectively, versus preoperative scores. By high-resolution computer tomography (CT) scans, fusion was achieved in 44 (88%) patients, developing bone occurred in 5 (10%), and 1 (2%) patient had pseudoarthrosis. One patient suffered a major operative complication–a bowel perforation with a pre-sacral abscess that resolved with treatment. CONCLUSION: Our initial 50 patients who underwent presacral ALIF showed clinical improvement and fusion rates comparable with other interbody fusion techniques; its safety was reflected by low complication rates. Its efficacy in future patients will continue to be monitored, and will be reported in a 2-year follow-up study of fusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4365614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Elsevier, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43656142015-03-23 Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up Bohinski, Robert J. Jain, Viral V. Tobler, William D. SAS J Full Length Article BACKGROUND: The presacral retroperitoneal approach to an axial lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique for interbody fusion at L5-S1 that has not been extensively studied, particularly with respect to long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The authors describe clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1-year follow-up for 50 consecutive patients who underwent the presacral ALIF. METHODS: Our patients included 24 males and 26 females who underwent the presacral ALIF procedure for interbody fusion at L5-S1. Indications included mechanical back pain and radiculopathy. Thirty-seven patients had disc degeneration at L5-S1, 7 had previously undergone a discectomy, and 6 had spondylolisthesis. A 2-level L4-S1 fusion was performed with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5 in 15 patients. AxiaLIF was performed as a stand-alone procedure in 5 patients and supplemented with pedicle screws in 45 patients. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were evaluated and complications were tracked. Fusion was evaluated by an independent neuro-radiologist. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, VAS and ODI scores had significantly improved by 49% and 50%, respectively, versus preoperative scores. By high-resolution computer tomography (CT) scans, fusion was achieved in 44 (88%) patients, developing bone occurred in 5 (10%), and 1 (2%) patient had pseudoarthrosis. One patient suffered a major operative complication–a bowel perforation with a pre-sacral abscess that resolved with treatment. CONCLUSION: Our initial 50 patients who underwent presacral ALIF showed clinical improvement and fusion rates comparable with other interbody fusion techniques; its safety was reflected by low complication rates. Its efficacy in future patients will continue to be monitored, and will be reported in a 2-year follow-up study of fusion. Elsevier, Inc. 2010-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365614/ /pubmed/25802650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.003 Text en © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Length Article Bohinski, Robert J. Jain, Viral V. Tobler, William D. Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up |
title | Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up |
title_full | Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up |
title_fullStr | Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up |
title_short | Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up |
title_sort | presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at l5-s1: clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up |
topic | Full Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bohinskirobertj presacralretroperitonealapproachtoaxiallumbarinterbodyfusionanewminimallyinvasivetechniqueatl5s1clinicaloutcomescomplicationsandfusionratesin50patientsat1yearfollowup AT jainviralv presacralretroperitonealapproachtoaxiallumbarinterbodyfusionanewminimallyinvasivetechniqueatl5s1clinicaloutcomescomplicationsandfusionratesin50patientsat1yearfollowup AT toblerwilliamd presacralretroperitonealapproachtoaxiallumbarinterbodyfusionanewminimallyinvasivetechniqueatl5s1clinicaloutcomescomplicationsandfusionratesin50patientsat1yearfollowup |