Cargando…

Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The presacral retroperitoneal approach to an axial lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique for interbody fusion at L5-S1 that has not been extensively studied, particularly with respect to long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The authors describe clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohinski, Robert J., Jain, Viral V., Tobler, William D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier, Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.003
_version_ 1782362251918835712
author Bohinski, Robert J.
Jain, Viral V.
Tobler, William D.
author_facet Bohinski, Robert J.
Jain, Viral V.
Tobler, William D.
author_sort Bohinski, Robert J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The presacral retroperitoneal approach to an axial lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique for interbody fusion at L5-S1 that has not been extensively studied, particularly with respect to long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The authors describe clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1-year follow-up for 50 consecutive patients who underwent the presacral ALIF. METHODS: Our patients included 24 males and 26 females who underwent the presacral ALIF procedure for interbody fusion at L5-S1. Indications included mechanical back pain and radiculopathy. Thirty-seven patients had disc degeneration at L5-S1, 7 had previously undergone a discectomy, and 6 had spondylolisthesis. A 2-level L4-S1 fusion was performed with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5 in 15 patients. AxiaLIF was performed as a stand-alone procedure in 5 patients and supplemented with pedicle screws in 45 patients. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were evaluated and complications were tracked. Fusion was evaluated by an independent neuro-radiologist. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, VAS and ODI scores had significantly improved by 49% and 50%, respectively, versus preoperative scores. By high-resolution computer tomography (CT) scans, fusion was achieved in 44 (88%) patients, developing bone occurred in 5 (10%), and 1 (2%) patient had pseudoarthrosis. One patient suffered a major operative complication–a bowel perforation with a pre-sacral abscess that resolved with treatment. CONCLUSION: Our initial 50 patients who underwent presacral ALIF showed clinical improvement and fusion rates comparable with other interbody fusion techniques; its safety was reflected by low complication rates. Its efficacy in future patients will continue to be monitored, and will be reported in a 2-year follow-up study of fusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Elsevier, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43656142015-03-23 Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up Bohinski, Robert J. Jain, Viral V. Tobler, William D. SAS J Full Length Article BACKGROUND: The presacral retroperitoneal approach to an axial lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a percutaneous, minimally invasive technique for interbody fusion at L5-S1 that has not been extensively studied, particularly with respect to long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The authors describe clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1-year follow-up for 50 consecutive patients who underwent the presacral ALIF. METHODS: Our patients included 24 males and 26 females who underwent the presacral ALIF procedure for interbody fusion at L5-S1. Indications included mechanical back pain and radiculopathy. Thirty-seven patients had disc degeneration at L5-S1, 7 had previously undergone a discectomy, and 6 had spondylolisthesis. A 2-level L4-S1 fusion was performed with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5 in 15 patients. AxiaLIF was performed as a stand-alone procedure in 5 patients and supplemented with pedicle screws in 45 patients. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were evaluated and complications were tracked. Fusion was evaluated by an independent neuro-radiologist. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, VAS and ODI scores had significantly improved by 49% and 50%, respectively, versus preoperative scores. By high-resolution computer tomography (CT) scans, fusion was achieved in 44 (88%) patients, developing bone occurred in 5 (10%), and 1 (2%) patient had pseudoarthrosis. One patient suffered a major operative complication–a bowel perforation with a pre-sacral abscess that resolved with treatment. CONCLUSION: Our initial 50 patients who underwent presacral ALIF showed clinical improvement and fusion rates comparable with other interbody fusion techniques; its safety was reflected by low complication rates. Its efficacy in future patients will continue to be monitored, and will be reported in a 2-year follow-up study of fusion. Elsevier, Inc. 2010-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365614/ /pubmed/25802650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.003 Text en © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Bohinski, Robert J.
Jain, Viral V.
Tobler, William D.
Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up
title Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up
title_full Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up
title_fullStr Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up
title_short Presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at L5-S1: Clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up
title_sort presacral retroperitoneal approach to axial lumbar interbody fusion: a new, minimally invasive technique at l5-s1: clinical outcomes, complications, and fusion rates in 50 patients at 1-year follow-up
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT bohinskirobertj presacralretroperitonealapproachtoaxiallumbarinterbodyfusionanewminimallyinvasivetechniqueatl5s1clinicaloutcomescomplicationsandfusionratesin50patientsat1yearfollowup
AT jainviralv presacralretroperitonealapproachtoaxiallumbarinterbodyfusionanewminimallyinvasivetechniqueatl5s1clinicaloutcomescomplicationsandfusionratesin50patientsat1yearfollowup
AT toblerwilliamd presacralretroperitonealapproachtoaxiallumbarinterbodyfusionanewminimallyinvasivetechniqueatl5s1clinicaloutcomescomplicationsandfusionratesin50patientsat1yearfollowup