Cargando…

Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons

Over the past few decades, remarkable advancements in the understanding of the origin of low-back pain and lumbar spinal disorders have been achieved. Spinal fusion is generally considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of low-back pain; however, fusion is also associated with accelerated dege...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serhan, Hassan, Mhatre, Devdatt, Defossez, Henri, Bono, Christopher M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001
_version_ 1782362254888402944
author Serhan, Hassan
Mhatre, Devdatt
Defossez, Henri
Bono, Christopher M.
author_facet Serhan, Hassan
Mhatre, Devdatt
Defossez, Henri
Bono, Christopher M.
author_sort Serhan, Hassan
collection PubMed
description Over the past few decades, remarkable advancements in the understanding of the origin of low-back pain and lumbar spinal disorders have been achieved. Spinal fusion is generally considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of low-back pain; however, fusion is also associated with accelerated degeneration of adjacent levels. Spinal arthroplasty and dynamic stabilization technologies, as well as the continuous improvement in diagnosis and surgical interventions, have opened a new era of treatment options. Recent advancements in nonfusion technologies such as motion-preservation devices and posterior dynamic stabilization may change the gold standard. These devices are designed with the intent to provide stabilization and eliminate pain while preserving motion of the functional spinal unit. The adaption of nonfusion technologies by the surgical community and payers for the treatment of degenerative spinal conditions will depend on the long-term clinical outcome of controlled randomized clinical studies. Although the development of nonfusion technology has just started and the adoption is very slow, it may be considered a viable option for motion preservation in coming years. This review article provides technical and surgical views from the past and from the present, as well as a glance at the future endeavors and challenges in instrumentation development for lumbar spinal disorders. © 2011 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43656272015-03-23 Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons Serhan, Hassan Mhatre, Devdatt Defossez, Henri Bono, Christopher M. SAS J Lumbar Arthroplasty Over the past few decades, remarkable advancements in the understanding of the origin of low-back pain and lumbar spinal disorders have been achieved. Spinal fusion is generally considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of low-back pain; however, fusion is also associated with accelerated degeneration of adjacent levels. Spinal arthroplasty and dynamic stabilization technologies, as well as the continuous improvement in diagnosis and surgical interventions, have opened a new era of treatment options. Recent advancements in nonfusion technologies such as motion-preservation devices and posterior dynamic stabilization may change the gold standard. These devices are designed with the intent to provide stabilization and eliminate pain while preserving motion of the functional spinal unit. The adaption of nonfusion technologies by the surgical community and payers for the treatment of degenerative spinal conditions will depend on the long-term clinical outcome of controlled randomized clinical studies. Although the development of nonfusion technology has just started and the adoption is very slow, it may be considered a viable option for motion preservation in coming years. This review article provides technical and surgical views from the past and from the present, as well as a glance at the future endeavors and challenges in instrumentation development for lumbar spinal disorders. © 2011 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2011-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365627/ /pubmed/25802672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001 Text en © 2011 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Lumbar Arthroplasty
Serhan, Hassan
Mhatre, Devdatt
Defossez, Henri
Bono, Christopher M.
Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
title Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
title_full Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
title_fullStr Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
title_full_unstemmed Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
title_short Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons
title_sort motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: the past, present, and future horizons
topic Lumbar Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001
work_keys_str_mv AT serhanhassan motionpreservingtechnologiesfordegenerativelumbarspinethepastpresentandfuturehorizons
AT mhatredevdatt motionpreservingtechnologiesfordegenerativelumbarspinethepastpresentandfuturehorizons
AT defossezhenri motionpreservingtechnologiesfordegenerativelumbarspinethepastpresentandfuturehorizons
AT bonochristopherm motionpreservingtechnologiesfordegenerativelumbarspinethepastpresentandfuturehorizons