Cargando…

Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanical durability and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). The human intervertebral disc is a complex, viscoelastic structure, permitting and constraining motion in 3 axes, thus providing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rischke, Burkhard, Ross, Raymond S., Jollenbeck, Boris A., Zimmers, Kari B., Defibaugh, Neal D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001
_version_ 1782362255797518336
author Rischke, Burkhard
Ross, Raymond S.
Jollenbeck, Boris A.
Zimmers, Kari B.
Defibaugh, Neal D.
author_facet Rischke, Burkhard
Ross, Raymond S.
Jollenbeck, Boris A.
Zimmers, Kari B.
Defibaugh, Neal D.
author_sort Rischke, Burkhard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanical durability and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). The human intervertebral disc is a complex, viscoelastic structure, permitting and constraining motion in 3 axes, thus providing stability. The ideal disc replacement should be viscoelastic and deformable in all directions, and it should restore disc height and angle. METHODS: Mechanical testing was conducted to validate the durability of the VTDR, and a clinical study was conducted to evaluate safety and performance. Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease at L4-5 or L5-S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial at 3 European sites. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for 2 years by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a visual analog scale (VAS), and independent radiographic analyses. RESULTS: The VTDR showed a fatigue life in excess of 50 million cycles (50-year equivalent) and a physiologically appropriate level of stiffness, motion, geometry, and viscoelasticity. We enrolled 28 men and 22 women in the clinical study, with a mean age of 40 years. Independent quantitative radiographic assessment indicated that the VTDR restored and maintained disc height and lordosis while providing physiologic motion. Mean ODI scores decreased from 48% preoperatively to 23% at 2 years’ follow-up. Mean VAS low-back pain scores decreased from 7.1 cm to 2.9 cm. Median scores indicated that half of the patient population had ODI scores below 10% and VAS low-back pain scores below 0.95 cm at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The VTDR has excellent durability and performs clinically and radiographically as intended for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The VTDR is intended to restore healthy anatomic properties and stability characteristics to the spinal segment. This study is the first to evaluate a VTDR in a 50-patient, multicenter European study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43656312015-03-23 Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Rischke, Burkhard Ross, Raymond S. Jollenbeck, Boris A. Zimmers, Kari B. Defibaugh, Neal D. SAS J Lumbar Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanical durability and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). The human intervertebral disc is a complex, viscoelastic structure, permitting and constraining motion in 3 axes, thus providing stability. The ideal disc replacement should be viscoelastic and deformable in all directions, and it should restore disc height and angle. METHODS: Mechanical testing was conducted to validate the durability of the VTDR, and a clinical study was conducted to evaluate safety and performance. Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease at L4-5 or L5-S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial at 3 European sites. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for 2 years by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a visual analog scale (VAS), and independent radiographic analyses. RESULTS: The VTDR showed a fatigue life in excess of 50 million cycles (50-year equivalent) and a physiologically appropriate level of stiffness, motion, geometry, and viscoelasticity. We enrolled 28 men and 22 women in the clinical study, with a mean age of 40 years. Independent quantitative radiographic assessment indicated that the VTDR restored and maintained disc height and lordosis while providing physiologic motion. Mean ODI scores decreased from 48% preoperatively to 23% at 2 years’ follow-up. Mean VAS low-back pain scores decreased from 7.1 cm to 2.9 cm. Median scores indicated that half of the patient population had ODI scores below 10% and VAS low-back pain scores below 0.95 cm at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The VTDR has excellent durability and performs clinically and radiographically as intended for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The VTDR is intended to restore healthy anatomic properties and stability characteristics to the spinal segment. This study is the first to evaluate a VTDR in a 50-patient, multicenter European study. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2011-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365631/ /pubmed/25802675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001 Text en © 2011 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Lumbar Arthroplasty
Rischke, Burkhard
Ross, Raymond S.
Jollenbeck, Boris A.
Zimmers, Kari B.
Defibaugh, Neal D.
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
title Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
title_full Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
title_fullStr Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
title_full_unstemmed Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
title_short Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
title_sort preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
topic Lumbar Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT rischkeburkhard preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement
AT rossraymonds preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement
AT jollenbeckborisa preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement
AT zimmerskarib preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement
AT defibaughneald preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement