Cargando…
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanical durability and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). The human intervertebral disc is a complex, viscoelastic structure, permitting and constraining motion in 3 axes, thus providing...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001 |
_version_ | 1782362255797518336 |
---|---|
author | Rischke, Burkhard Ross, Raymond S. Jollenbeck, Boris A. Zimmers, Kari B. Defibaugh, Neal D. |
author_facet | Rischke, Burkhard Ross, Raymond S. Jollenbeck, Boris A. Zimmers, Kari B. Defibaugh, Neal D. |
author_sort | Rischke, Burkhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanical durability and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). The human intervertebral disc is a complex, viscoelastic structure, permitting and constraining motion in 3 axes, thus providing stability. The ideal disc replacement should be viscoelastic and deformable in all directions, and it should restore disc height and angle. METHODS: Mechanical testing was conducted to validate the durability of the VTDR, and a clinical study was conducted to evaluate safety and performance. Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease at L4-5 or L5-S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial at 3 European sites. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for 2 years by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a visual analog scale (VAS), and independent radiographic analyses. RESULTS: The VTDR showed a fatigue life in excess of 50 million cycles (50-year equivalent) and a physiologically appropriate level of stiffness, motion, geometry, and viscoelasticity. We enrolled 28 men and 22 women in the clinical study, with a mean age of 40 years. Independent quantitative radiographic assessment indicated that the VTDR restored and maintained disc height and lordosis while providing physiologic motion. Mean ODI scores decreased from 48% preoperatively to 23% at 2 years’ follow-up. Mean VAS low-back pain scores decreased from 7.1 cm to 2.9 cm. Median scores indicated that half of the patient population had ODI scores below 10% and VAS low-back pain scores below 0.95 cm at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The VTDR has excellent durability and performs clinically and radiographically as intended for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The VTDR is intended to restore healthy anatomic properties and stability characteristics to the spinal segment. This study is the first to evaluate a VTDR in a 50-patient, multicenter European study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4365631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43656312015-03-23 Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Rischke, Burkhard Ross, Raymond S. Jollenbeck, Boris A. Zimmers, Kari B. Defibaugh, Neal D. SAS J Lumbar Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the mechanical durability and the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR). The human intervertebral disc is a complex, viscoelastic structure, permitting and constraining motion in 3 axes, thus providing stability. The ideal disc replacement should be viscoelastic and deformable in all directions, and it should restore disc height and angle. METHODS: Mechanical testing was conducted to validate the durability of the VTDR, and a clinical study was conducted to evaluate safety and performance. Fifty patients with single-level, symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease at L4-5 or L5-S1 were enrolled in a clinical trial at 3 European sites. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for 2 years by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a visual analog scale (VAS), and independent radiographic analyses. RESULTS: The VTDR showed a fatigue life in excess of 50 million cycles (50-year equivalent) and a physiologically appropriate level of stiffness, motion, geometry, and viscoelasticity. We enrolled 28 men and 22 women in the clinical study, with a mean age of 40 years. Independent quantitative radiographic assessment indicated that the VTDR restored and maintained disc height and lordosis while providing physiologic motion. Mean ODI scores decreased from 48% preoperatively to 23% at 2 years’ follow-up. Mean VAS low-back pain scores decreased from 7.1 cm to 2.9 cm. Median scores indicated that half of the patient population had ODI scores below 10% and VAS low-back pain scores below 0.95 cm at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The VTDR has excellent durability and performs clinically and radiographically as intended for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The VTDR is intended to restore healthy anatomic properties and stability characteristics to the spinal segment. This study is the first to evaluate a VTDR in a 50-patient, multicenter European study. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2011-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365631/ /pubmed/25802675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001 Text en © 2011 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Lumbar Arthroplasty Rischke, Burkhard Ross, Raymond S. Jollenbeck, Boris A. Zimmers, Kari B. Defibaugh, Neal D. Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement |
title | Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement |
title_full | Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement |
title_fullStr | Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement |
title_short | Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement |
title_sort | preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement |
topic | Lumbar Arthroplasty |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.08.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rischkeburkhard preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement AT rossraymonds preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement AT jollenbeckborisa preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement AT zimmerskarib preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement AT defibaughneald preclinicalandclinicalexperiencewithaviscoelastictotaldiscreplacement |