Cargando…
Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications
BACKGROUND: Iliac crest harvest has been considered the “gold standard” at producing successful arthrodesis of the lumbar spine but is also associated with many donor-site morbidities. Many alternatives have been used to avoid iliac crest harvest, including autologous bone from other donor sites, al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier, Inc.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.004 |
_version_ | 1782362256929980416 |
---|---|
author | Vaz, Kenneth Verma, Kushagra Protopsaltis, Themistocles Schwab, Frank Lonner, Baron Errico, Thomas |
author_facet | Vaz, Kenneth Verma, Kushagra Protopsaltis, Themistocles Schwab, Frank Lonner, Baron Errico, Thomas |
author_sort | Vaz, Kenneth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Iliac crest harvest has been considered the “gold standard” at producing successful arthrodesis of the lumbar spine but is also associated with many donor-site morbidities. Many alternatives have been used to avoid iliac crest harvest, including autologous bone from other donor sites, allogeneic bone, ceramics, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (rhBMPs). This review will highlight the properties and preparations of these graft types and their potential complications and reported clinical efficacy. METHODS: A Medline search was conducted via PubMed by use of the following terms in various combinations: lumbar fusion, freeze-dried allograft, fresh-frozen allograft, autograft, iliac crest, demineralized bone matrix, rhBMP-2, rhBMP-7, scoliosis, bone marrow aspirate, HEALOS, coralline hydroxyapatite, beta tricalcium phosphate, synthetic, ceramics, spinal fusion, PLF, PLIF, ALIF, and TLIF. Only articles written in English were assessed for appropriate material. Related articles were also assessed depending on the content of articles found in the original literature search. CONCLUSIONS: Although iliac crest remains the gold standard, reported success with alternative approaches, especially in combination, has shown promise. Stronger evidence with limited sources of potential bias is necessary to provide a clear picture of their clinical efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4365636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Elsevier, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43656362015-03-23 Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications Vaz, Kenneth Verma, Kushagra Protopsaltis, Themistocles Schwab, Frank Lonner, Baron Errico, Thomas SAS J Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Iliac crest harvest has been considered the “gold standard” at producing successful arthrodesis of the lumbar spine but is also associated with many donor-site morbidities. Many alternatives have been used to avoid iliac crest harvest, including autologous bone from other donor sites, allogeneic bone, ceramics, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (rhBMPs). This review will highlight the properties and preparations of these graft types and their potential complications and reported clinical efficacy. METHODS: A Medline search was conducted via PubMed by use of the following terms in various combinations: lumbar fusion, freeze-dried allograft, fresh-frozen allograft, autograft, iliac crest, demineralized bone matrix, rhBMP-2, rhBMP-7, scoliosis, bone marrow aspirate, HEALOS, coralline hydroxyapatite, beta tricalcium phosphate, synthetic, ceramics, spinal fusion, PLF, PLIF, ALIF, and TLIF. Only articles written in English were assessed for appropriate material. Related articles were also assessed depending on the content of articles found in the original literature search. CONCLUSIONS: Although iliac crest remains the gold standard, reported success with alternative approaches, especially in combination, has shown promise. Stronger evidence with limited sources of potential bias is necessary to provide a clear picture of their clinical efficacy. Elsevier, Inc. 2010-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365636/ /pubmed/25802654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.004 Text en © 2010 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Length Article Vaz, Kenneth Verma, Kushagra Protopsaltis, Themistocles Schwab, Frank Lonner, Baron Errico, Thomas Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications |
title | Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications |
title_full | Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications |
title_fullStr | Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications |
title_short | Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications |
title_sort | bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications |
topic | Full Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazkenneth bonegraftingoptionsforlumbarspinesurgeryareviewexaminingclinicalefficacyandcomplications AT vermakushagra bonegraftingoptionsforlumbarspinesurgeryareviewexaminingclinicalefficacyandcomplications AT protopsaltisthemistocles bonegraftingoptionsforlumbarspinesurgeryareviewexaminingclinicalefficacyandcomplications AT schwabfrank bonegraftingoptionsforlumbarspinesurgeryareviewexaminingclinicalefficacyandcomplications AT lonnerbaron bonegraftingoptionsforlumbarspinesurgeryareviewexaminingclinicalefficacyandcomplications AT erricothomas bonegraftingoptionsforlumbarspinesurgeryareviewexaminingclinicalefficacyandcomplications |