Cargando…

Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is dependent on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging for visualization, which significantly increases exposure to radiation. Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy (NAV) can potentially decrease radiation exposure and improve the operating room environment by red...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webb, Jonathan E., Regev, Gilad J., Garfin, Steven R., Kim, Choll W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier, Inc. 2010
Materias:
Mis
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.002
_version_ 1782362258314100736
author Webb, Jonathan E.
Regev, Gilad J.
Garfin, Steven R.
Kim, Choll W.
author_facet Webb, Jonathan E.
Regev, Gilad J.
Garfin, Steven R.
Kim, Choll W.
author_sort Webb, Jonathan E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is dependent on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging for visualization, which significantly increases exposure to radiation. Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy (NAV) can potentially decrease radiation exposure and improve the operating room environment by reducing the need for real-time fluoroscopy. The direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) procedure is a technique for MIS intervertebral lumbar and thoracic interbody fusions. This study assesses the use of navigation for the DLIF procedure in comparison to standard fluoroscopy (FLUORO), as well as the accuracy of the NAV MIS DLIF procedure. METHODS: Three fresh whole-body cadavers underwent multiple DLIF procedures at the T10-L5 levels via either NAV or FLUORO. Radiation exposure and surgical times were recorded and compared between groups. An additional cadaver was used to evaluate the accuracy of the NAV system for the DLIF procedure by measuring the deviation error as the surgeon worked further from the anterior superior iliac spine tracker. RESULTS: Approach, discectomy, and total fluoroscopy times for FLUORO were longer than NAV (P < .05). In contrast, the setup time was longer in NAV (P = .005). Cage insertion and total operating times were similar for both. Radiation exposure to the surgeon for NAV was significantly less than FLUORO (P < .05). Accuracy of the NAV system was within 1 mm for L2-5. CONCLUSION: Navigation for the DLIF procedure is feasible. Accuracy for this procedure over the most common levels (L2-5) is likely sufficient for safe clinical application. Although initial setup times were longer with NAV, simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral imaging with the NAV system resulted in overall surgery times similar to FLUORO. Navigation minimizes fluoroscopic radiation exposure. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Navigation for the DLIF procedure is accurate and decreases radiation exposure without increasing the overall surgical time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Elsevier, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43656422015-03-23 Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study Webb, Jonathan E. Regev, Gilad J. Garfin, Steven R. Kim, Choll W. SAS J Mis BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is dependent on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging for visualization, which significantly increases exposure to radiation. Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy (NAV) can potentially decrease radiation exposure and improve the operating room environment by reducing the need for real-time fluoroscopy. The direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) procedure is a technique for MIS intervertebral lumbar and thoracic interbody fusions. This study assesses the use of navigation for the DLIF procedure in comparison to standard fluoroscopy (FLUORO), as well as the accuracy of the NAV MIS DLIF procedure. METHODS: Three fresh whole-body cadavers underwent multiple DLIF procedures at the T10-L5 levels via either NAV or FLUORO. Radiation exposure and surgical times were recorded and compared between groups. An additional cadaver was used to evaluate the accuracy of the NAV system for the DLIF procedure by measuring the deviation error as the surgeon worked further from the anterior superior iliac spine tracker. RESULTS: Approach, discectomy, and total fluoroscopy times for FLUORO were longer than NAV (P < .05). In contrast, the setup time was longer in NAV (P = .005). Cage insertion and total operating times were similar for both. Radiation exposure to the surgeon for NAV was significantly less than FLUORO (P < .05). Accuracy of the NAV system was within 1 mm for L2-5. CONCLUSION: Navigation for the DLIF procedure is feasible. Accuracy for this procedure over the most common levels (L2-5) is likely sufficient for safe clinical application. Although initial setup times were longer with NAV, simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral imaging with the NAV system resulted in overall surgery times similar to FLUORO. Navigation minimizes fluoroscopic radiation exposure. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Navigation for the DLIF procedure is accurate and decreases radiation exposure without increasing the overall surgical time. Elsevier, Inc. 2010-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365642/ /pubmed/25802659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.002 Text en © 2010 SAS - The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Mis
Webb, Jonathan E.
Regev, Gilad J.
Garfin, Steven R.
Kim, Choll W.
Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study
title Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study
title_full Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study
title_fullStr Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study
title_full_unstemmed Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study
title_short Navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study
title_sort navigation-assisted fluoroscopy in minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion: a cadaveric study
topic Mis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT webbjonathane navigationassistedfluoroscopyinminimallyinvasivedirectlateralinterbodyfusionacadavericstudy
AT regevgiladj navigationassistedfluoroscopyinminimallyinvasivedirectlateralinterbodyfusionacadavericstudy
AT garfinstevenr navigationassistedfluoroscopyinminimallyinvasivedirectlateralinterbodyfusionacadavericstudy
AT kimchollw navigationassistedfluoroscopyinminimallyinvasivedirectlateralinterbodyfusionacadavericstudy