Cargando…

The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auerbach, Joshua D., Namdari, Surena, Milby, Andrew H., White, Andrew P., Reddy, Sudheer C., Lonner, Baron S., Balderston, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: RRY Publications, LLC 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR
_version_ 1782362262168666112
author Auerbach, Joshua D.
Namdari, Surena
Milby, Andrew H.
White, Andrew P.
Reddy, Sudheer C.
Lonner, Baron S.
Balderston, Richard A.
author_facet Auerbach, Joshua D.
Namdari, Surena
Milby, Andrew H.
White, Andrew P.
Reddy, Sudheer C.
Lonner, Baron S.
Balderston, Richard A.
author_sort Auerbach, Joshua D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR. We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on “by hand” and on “gold standard” flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion. METHODS: Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined. RESULTS: Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher RRY Publications, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43656602015-03-23 The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Auerbach, Joshua D. Namdari, Surena Milby, Andrew H. White, Andrew P. Reddy, Sudheer C. Lonner, Baron S. Balderston, Richard A. SAS J Lumbar Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR. We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on “by hand” and on “gold standard” flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion. METHODS: Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined. RESULTS: Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. RRY Publications, LLC 2008-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365660/ /pubmed/25802620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR Text en Copyright SAS - Spine Arthroplasty Society 2008 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Lumbar Arthroplasty
Auerbach, Joshua D.
Namdari, Surena
Milby, Andrew H.
White, Andrew P.
Reddy, Sudheer C.
Lonner, Baron S.
Balderston, Richard A.
The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
title The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
title_full The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
title_fullStr The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
title_full_unstemmed The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
title_short The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
title_sort parallax effect in the evaluation of range of motion in lumbar total disc replacement
topic Lumbar Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR
work_keys_str_mv AT auerbachjoshuad theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT namdarisurena theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT milbyandrewh theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT whiteandrewp theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT reddysudheerc theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT lonnerbarons theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT balderstonricharda theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT auerbachjoshuad parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT namdarisurena parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT milbyandrewh parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT whiteandrewp parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT reddysudheerc parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT lonnerbarons parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement
AT balderstonricharda parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement