Cargando…
The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement
BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the asses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
RRY Publications, LLC
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR |
_version_ | 1782362262168666112 |
---|---|
author | Auerbach, Joshua D. Namdari, Surena Milby, Andrew H. White, Andrew P. Reddy, Sudheer C. Lonner, Baron S. Balderston, Richard A. |
author_facet | Auerbach, Joshua D. Namdari, Surena Milby, Andrew H. White, Andrew P. Reddy, Sudheer C. Lonner, Baron S. Balderston, Richard A. |
author_sort | Auerbach, Joshua D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR. We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on “by hand” and on “gold standard” flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion. METHODS: Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined. RESULTS: Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4365660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | RRY Publications, LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43656602015-03-23 The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Auerbach, Joshua D. Namdari, Surena Milby, Andrew H. White, Andrew P. Reddy, Sudheer C. Lonner, Baron S. Balderston, Richard A. SAS J Lumbar Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) has been shown to influence clinical outcomes of total disc replacement (TDR). While the parallax effect in image acquisition has been shown in the literature to influence the accuracy of a variety of measurements, this concept has not been investigated in the assessment of ROM analysis following TDR. We performed an evaluation of the influence of radiograph beam angle on “by hand” and on “gold standard” flexionextension ROM measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) the influence of X-ray beam angle on index level angle (ILA) measurements in lumbar TDR using the keel method, and (2) whether the out-of-plane radiographic beam effects cause a difference between true and calculated range of motion. METHODS: Eight blinded orthopaedic surgeons used the keel method to calculate ROM measurements from radiographs of a flexible Sawbones model (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, Washington) implanted with a ProDisc-L device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). Radiographs were obtained at beam angles of 0°, 5°, 10°, and 15° in the sagittal plane from the device center. Calculations were compared to measurements obtained by a validated digitized software method (Quantitative Motion Analysis, QMA, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, Texas). Inter- and intraobserver precision and accuracy were determined. RESULTS: Compared with QMA, the radiographic keel method had an average error of 3.7°. No significant effect of variation in beam angle on interobserver precision (N = 16, P = .92) or accuracy (N = 16, P = 0.86) or intraobserver precision (N = 8, P = .09) or accuracy (N = 8, P = 0.07) of ROM measurements was identified. Repeat testing with QMA also revealed no effect of parallax and resulted in nearly identical ROM measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy and precision of the keel method to determine ROM from index level angle measurements after TDR was not affected by increases in X-ray beam angles up to 15° from the device center. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our study demonstrates that range of motion measurements are not influenced by parallax effect when using the keel method to determine index level angle measurements in lumbar total disc replacement. RRY Publications, LLC 2008-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4365660/ /pubmed/25802620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR Text en Copyright SAS - Spine Arthroplasty Society 2008 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Lumbar Arthroplasty Auerbach, Joshua D. Namdari, Surena Milby, Andrew H. White, Andrew P. Reddy, Sudheer C. Lonner, Baron S. Balderston, Richard A. The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement |
title | The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement |
title_full | The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement |
title_fullStr | The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement |
title_short | The Parallax Effect in the Evaluation of Range of Motion in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement |
title_sort | parallax effect in the evaluation of range of motion in lumbar total disc replacement |
topic | Lumbar Arthroplasty |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0020-RR |
work_keys_str_mv | AT auerbachjoshuad theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT namdarisurena theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT milbyandrewh theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT whiteandrewp theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT reddysudheerc theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT lonnerbarons theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT balderstonricharda theparallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT auerbachjoshuad parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT namdarisurena parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT milbyandrewh parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT whiteandrewp parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT reddysudheerc parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT lonnerbarons parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement AT balderstonricharda parallaxeffectintheevaluationofrangeofmotioninlumbartotaldiscreplacement |