Cargando…

Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain

PURPOSE: Chronic hip pain is a common symptom experienced by many people. Often, surgery is not an option for patients with multiple comorbidities, and conventional drugs either have many side effects or are ineffective. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a new method in the treatment of pain. We attemp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chye, Cien-Leong, Liang, Cheng-Loong, Lu, Kang, Chen, Ya-Wen, Liliang, Po-Chou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834413
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S79961
_version_ 1782362274437005312
author Chye, Cien-Leong
Liang, Cheng-Loong
Lu, Kang
Chen, Ya-Wen
Liliang, Po-Chou
author_facet Chye, Cien-Leong
Liang, Cheng-Loong
Lu, Kang
Chen, Ya-Wen
Liliang, Po-Chou
author_sort Chye, Cien-Leong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Chronic hip pain is a common symptom experienced by many people. Often, surgery is not an option for patients with multiple comorbidities, and conventional drugs either have many side effects or are ineffective. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a new method in the treatment of pain. We attempt to compare the efficacy of PRF relative to conservative management for chronic hip pain. RPATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 2011 and July 2013, 29 patients with chronic hip pain were divided into two groups (PRF and conservative treatment) according to consent or refusal to undergo PRF procedure. Fifteen patients received PRF of the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves, and 14 patients received conservative treatment. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oxford hip scores (OHS), and pain medications were used for outcome measurement before treatment and at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: At 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment initiation, improvements in VAS were significantly greater with PRF. Improvements in OHS were significantly greater in the PRF group at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. Patients in the PRF group also used less pain medications. Eight subjects in the conservative treatment group switched to the PRF group after 12 weeks, and six of them had >50% improvement. CONCLUSION: When compared with conservative treatment, PRF of the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves offers greater pain relief for chronic hip pain and can augment physical functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43657402015-04-01 Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain Chye, Cien-Leong Liang, Cheng-Loong Lu, Kang Chen, Ya-Wen Liliang, Po-Chou Clin Interv Aging Short Report PURPOSE: Chronic hip pain is a common symptom experienced by many people. Often, surgery is not an option for patients with multiple comorbidities, and conventional drugs either have many side effects or are ineffective. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a new method in the treatment of pain. We attempt to compare the efficacy of PRF relative to conservative management for chronic hip pain. RPATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 2011 and July 2013, 29 patients with chronic hip pain were divided into two groups (PRF and conservative treatment) according to consent or refusal to undergo PRF procedure. Fifteen patients received PRF of the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves, and 14 patients received conservative treatment. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oxford hip scores (OHS), and pain medications were used for outcome measurement before treatment and at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: At 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment initiation, improvements in VAS were significantly greater with PRF. Improvements in OHS were significantly greater in the PRF group at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. Patients in the PRF group also used less pain medications. Eight subjects in the conservative treatment group switched to the PRF group after 12 weeks, and six of them had >50% improvement. CONCLUSION: When compared with conservative treatment, PRF of the articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves offers greater pain relief for chronic hip pain and can augment physical functioning. Dove Medical Press 2015-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4365740/ /pubmed/25834413 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S79961 Text en © 2015 Chye et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Short Report
Chye, Cien-Leong
Liang, Cheng-Loong
Lu, Kang
Chen, Ya-Wen
Liliang, Po-Chou
Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain
title Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain
title_full Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain
title_fullStr Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain
title_short Pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain
title_sort pulsed radiofrequency treatment of articular branches of femoral and obturator nerves for chronic hip pain
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25834413
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S79961
work_keys_str_mv AT chyecienleong pulsedradiofrequencytreatmentofarticularbranchesoffemoralandobturatornervesforchronichippain
AT liangchengloong pulsedradiofrequencytreatmentofarticularbranchesoffemoralandobturatornervesforchronichippain
AT lukang pulsedradiofrequencytreatmentofarticularbranchesoffemoralandobturatornervesforchronichippain
AT chenyawen pulsedradiofrequencytreatmentofarticularbranchesoffemoralandobturatornervesforchronichippain
AT liliangpochou pulsedradiofrequencytreatmentofarticularbranchesoffemoralandobturatornervesforchronichippain