Cargando…
En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature
BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal lipomas are an extremely rare condition with only 17 cases described in the literature since 1980. They can reach enormous size and cause significant abdominal symptoms. The most important differential diagnosis is the well-differentiated liposarcoma, which preoperatively...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1038-7 |
_version_ | 1782362281710977024 |
---|---|
author | Weniger, Maximilian D’Haese, Jan G Kunz, Wolfgang Pratschke, Sebastian Guba, Markus Werner, Jens Angele, Martin K |
author_facet | Weniger, Maximilian D’Haese, Jan G Kunz, Wolfgang Pratschke, Sebastian Guba, Markus Werner, Jens Angele, Martin K |
author_sort | Weniger, Maximilian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal lipomas are an extremely rare condition with only 17 cases described in the literature since 1980. They can reach enormous size and cause significant abdominal symptoms. The most important differential diagnosis is the well-differentiated liposarcoma, which preoperatively often may not definitely be ruled out. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 73 year-old Caucasian patient with a giant retroperitoneal lipoma of 9 kg measuring 55 cm in diameter. The patient presented with abdominal pain and swelling that had been slowly progressive for the last 15 years. On computerized tomography an immense retroperitoneal tumor was revealed. Intraoperatively, the tumor did not show any signs of infiltrative growth, therefore sole tumor extirpation was performed. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal lipomas are not clearly distinguishable from well-differentiated liposarcomas on imaging and even biopsies may be misleading. Moreover, abdominal symptoms, i.e. pain, obstipation and dysphagia may occur due to mechanical displacement. Therefore, surgical exploration with complete oncological resection is the therapy of choice if malignity cannot be ruled out. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1038-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4365774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43657742015-03-20 En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature Weniger, Maximilian D’Haese, Jan G Kunz, Wolfgang Pratschke, Sebastian Guba, Markus Werner, Jens Angele, Martin K BMC Res Notes Case Report BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal lipomas are an extremely rare condition with only 17 cases described in the literature since 1980. They can reach enormous size and cause significant abdominal symptoms. The most important differential diagnosis is the well-differentiated liposarcoma, which preoperatively often may not definitely be ruled out. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 73 year-old Caucasian patient with a giant retroperitoneal lipoma of 9 kg measuring 55 cm in diameter. The patient presented with abdominal pain and swelling that had been slowly progressive for the last 15 years. On computerized tomography an immense retroperitoneal tumor was revealed. Intraoperatively, the tumor did not show any signs of infiltrative growth, therefore sole tumor extirpation was performed. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal lipomas are not clearly distinguishable from well-differentiated liposarcomas on imaging and even biopsies may be misleading. Moreover, abdominal symptoms, i.e. pain, obstipation and dysphagia may occur due to mechanical displacement. Therefore, surgical exploration with complete oncological resection is the therapy of choice if malignity cannot be ruled out. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1038-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4365774/ /pubmed/25890295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1038-7 Text en © Weniger et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Weniger, Maximilian D’Haese, Jan G Kunz, Wolfgang Pratschke, Sebastian Guba, Markus Werner, Jens Angele, Martin K En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature |
title | En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature |
title_full | En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature |
title_fullStr | En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature |
title_short | En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature |
title_sort | en-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1038-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenigermaximilian enblocresectionofagiantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT dhaesejang enblocresectionofagiantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT kunzwolfgang enblocresectionofagiantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT pratschkesebastian enblocresectionofagiantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT gubamarkus enblocresectionofagiantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT wernerjens enblocresectionofagiantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT angelemartink enblocresectionofagiantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature |