Cargando…

Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review

The establishment of sustainable soil waste management practices implies minimizing their environmental losses associated with climate change (greenhouse gases: GHGs) and ecosystems acidification (ammonia: NH(3)). Although a number of management strategies for solid waste management have been invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pardo, Guillermo, Moral, Raúl, Aguilera, Eduardo, del Prado, Agustín
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12806
_version_ 1782362293586100224
author Pardo, Guillermo
Moral, Raúl
Aguilera, Eduardo
del Prado, Agustín
author_facet Pardo, Guillermo
Moral, Raúl
Aguilera, Eduardo
del Prado, Agustín
author_sort Pardo, Guillermo
collection PubMed
description The establishment of sustainable soil waste management practices implies minimizing their environmental losses associated with climate change (greenhouse gases: GHGs) and ecosystems acidification (ammonia: NH(3)). Although a number of management strategies for solid waste management have been investigated to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) losses in relation to varied environmental and operational conditions, their overall effect is still uncertain. In this context, we have analyzed the current scientific information through a systematic review. We quantified the response of GHG emissions, NH(3) emissions, and total N losses to different solid waste management strategies (conventional solid storage, turned composting, forced aerated composting, covering, compaction, addition/substitution of bulking agents and the use of additives). Our study is based on a meta-analysis of 50 research articles involving 304 observations. Our results indicated that improving the structure of the pile (waste or manure heap) via addition or substitution of certain bulking agents significantly reduced nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and methane (CH(4)) emissions by 53% and 71%, respectively. Turned composting systems, unlike forced aerated composted systems, showed potential for reducing GHGs (N(2)O: 50% and CH(4): 71%). Bulking agents and both composting systems involved a certain degree of pollution swapping as they significantly promoted NH(3) emissions by 35%, 54%, and 121% for bulking agents, turned and forced aerated composting, respectively. Strategies based on the restriction of O(2) supply, such as covering or compaction, did not show significant effects on reducing GHGs but substantially decreased NH(3) emissions by 61% and 54% for covering and compaction, respectively. The use of specific additives significantly reduced NH(3) losses by 69%. Our meta-analysis suggested that there is enough evidence to refine future Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodologies from solid waste, especially for solid waste composting practices. More holistic and integrated approaches are therefore required to develop more sustainable solid waste management systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4365898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43658982015-03-23 Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review Pardo, Guillermo Moral, Raúl Aguilera, Eduardo del Prado, Agustín Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles The establishment of sustainable soil waste management practices implies minimizing their environmental losses associated with climate change (greenhouse gases: GHGs) and ecosystems acidification (ammonia: NH(3)). Although a number of management strategies for solid waste management have been investigated to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) losses in relation to varied environmental and operational conditions, their overall effect is still uncertain. In this context, we have analyzed the current scientific information through a systematic review. We quantified the response of GHG emissions, NH(3) emissions, and total N losses to different solid waste management strategies (conventional solid storage, turned composting, forced aerated composting, covering, compaction, addition/substitution of bulking agents and the use of additives). Our study is based on a meta-analysis of 50 research articles involving 304 observations. Our results indicated that improving the structure of the pile (waste or manure heap) via addition or substitution of certain bulking agents significantly reduced nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and methane (CH(4)) emissions by 53% and 71%, respectively. Turned composting systems, unlike forced aerated composted systems, showed potential for reducing GHGs (N(2)O: 50% and CH(4): 71%). Bulking agents and both composting systems involved a certain degree of pollution swapping as they significantly promoted NH(3) emissions by 35%, 54%, and 121% for bulking agents, turned and forced aerated composting, respectively. Strategies based on the restriction of O(2) supply, such as covering or compaction, did not show significant effects on reducing GHGs but substantially decreased NH(3) emissions by 61% and 54% for covering and compaction, respectively. The use of specific additives significantly reduced NH(3) losses by 69%. Our meta-analysis suggested that there is enough evidence to refine future Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodologies from solid waste, especially for solid waste composting practices. More holistic and integrated approaches are therefore required to develop more sustainable solid waste management systems. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-03 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4365898/ /pubmed/25393229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12806 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Primary Research Articles
Pardo, Guillermo
Moral, Raúl
Aguilera, Eduardo
del Prado, Agustín
Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
title Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
title_full Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
title_fullStr Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
title_short Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
title_sort gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
topic Primary Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4365898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12806
work_keys_str_mv AT pardoguillermo gaseousemissionsfrommanagementofsolidwasteasystematicreview
AT moralraul gaseousemissionsfrommanagementofsolidwasteasystematicreview
AT aguileraeduardo gaseousemissionsfrommanagementofsolidwasteasystematicreview
AT delpradoagustin gaseousemissionsfrommanagementofsolidwasteasystematicreview