Cargando…

Comparison of standardized uptake values measured on F-NaF PET/CT scans using three different tube current intensities

OBJECTIVE: To analyze standardized uptake values (SUVs) using three different tube current intensities for attenuation correction on (18)FNaF PET/CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 254 (18)F-NaF PET/CT studies were analyzed using 10, 20 and 30 mAs. The SUVs were calculated in volumes of int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valadares, Agnes Araujo, Duarte, Paulo Schiavom, Woellner, Eduardo Bechtloff, Coura-Filho, George Barberio, Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit, Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0034
_version_ 1782362301848879104
author Valadares, Agnes Araujo
Duarte, Paulo Schiavom
Woellner, Eduardo Bechtloff
Coura-Filho, George Barberio
Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit
Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto
author_facet Valadares, Agnes Araujo
Duarte, Paulo Schiavom
Woellner, Eduardo Bechtloff
Coura-Filho, George Barberio
Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit
Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto
author_sort Valadares, Agnes Araujo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze standardized uptake values (SUVs) using three different tube current intensities for attenuation correction on (18)FNaF PET/CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 254 (18)F-NaF PET/CT studies were analyzed using 10, 20 and 30 mAs. The SUVs were calculated in volumes of interest (VOIs) drawn on three skeletal regions, namely, right proximal humeral diaphysis (RH), right proximal femoral diaphysis (RF), and first lumbar vertebra (LV1) in a total of 712 VOIs. The analyses covered 675 regions classified as normal (236 RH, 232 RF, and 207 LV1). RESULTS: Mean SUV for each skeletal region was 3.8, 5.4 and 14.4 for RH, RF, and LV1, respectively. As the studies were grouped according to mAs value, the mean SUV values were 3.8, 3.9 and 3.7 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RH region; 5.4, 5.5 and 5.4 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RF region; 13.8, 14.9 and 14.5 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the LV1 region. CONCLUSION: The three tube current values yielded similar results for SUV calculation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4366024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43660242015-03-20 Comparison of standardized uptake values measured on F-NaF PET/CT scans using three different tube current intensities Valadares, Agnes Araujo Duarte, Paulo Schiavom Woellner, Eduardo Bechtloff Coura-Filho, George Barberio Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto Radiol Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To analyze standardized uptake values (SUVs) using three different tube current intensities for attenuation correction on (18)FNaF PET/CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 254 (18)F-NaF PET/CT studies were analyzed using 10, 20 and 30 mAs. The SUVs were calculated in volumes of interest (VOIs) drawn on three skeletal regions, namely, right proximal humeral diaphysis (RH), right proximal femoral diaphysis (RF), and first lumbar vertebra (LV1) in a total of 712 VOIs. The analyses covered 675 regions classified as normal (236 RH, 232 RF, and 207 LV1). RESULTS: Mean SUV for each skeletal region was 3.8, 5.4 and 14.4 for RH, RF, and LV1, respectively. As the studies were grouped according to mAs value, the mean SUV values were 3.8, 3.9 and 3.7 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RH region; 5.4, 5.5 and 5.4 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RF region; 13.8, 14.9 and 14.5 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the LV1 region. CONCLUSION: The three tube current values yielded similar results for SUV calculation. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4366024/ /pubmed/25798003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0034 Text en © Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Valadares, Agnes Araujo
Duarte, Paulo Schiavom
Woellner, Eduardo Bechtloff
Coura-Filho, George Barberio
Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit
Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto
Comparison of standardized uptake values measured on F-NaF PET/CT scans using three different tube current intensities
title Comparison of standardized uptake values measured on F-NaF PET/CT scans using three different tube current intensities
title_full Comparison of standardized uptake values measured on F-NaF PET/CT scans using three different tube current intensities
title_fullStr Comparison of standardized uptake values measured on F-NaF PET/CT scans using three different tube current intensities
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of standardized uptake values measured on F-NaF PET/CT scans using three different tube current intensities
title_short Comparison of standardized uptake values measured on F-NaF PET/CT scans using three different tube current intensities
title_sort comparison of standardized uptake values measured on f-naf pet/ct scans using three different tube current intensities
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0034
work_keys_str_mv AT valadaresagnesaraujo comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesmeasuredonfnafpetctscansusingthreedifferenttubecurrentintensities
AT duartepauloschiavom comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesmeasuredonfnafpetctscansusingthreedifferenttubecurrentintensities
AT woellnereduardobechtloff comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesmeasuredonfnafpetctscansusingthreedifferenttubecurrentintensities
AT courafilhogeorgebarberio comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesmeasuredonfnafpetctscansusingthreedifferenttubecurrentintensities
AT sapienzamarcelotatit comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesmeasuredonfnafpetctscansusingthreedifferenttubecurrentintensities
AT buchpiguelcarlosalberto comparisonofstandardizeduptakevaluesmeasuredonfnafpetctscansusingthreedifferenttubecurrentintensities