Cargando…
When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations
The problem size effect is a well-established finding in arithmetic problem solving and is characterized by worse performance in problems with larger compared to smaller operand size. Solving small and large arithmetic problems has also been shown to involve different cognitive processes and distinc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120665 |
_version_ | 1782362325720760320 |
---|---|
author | Rütsche, Bruno Hauser, Tobias U. Jäncke, Lutz Grabner, Roland H. |
author_facet | Rütsche, Bruno Hauser, Tobias U. Jäncke, Lutz Grabner, Roland H. |
author_sort | Rütsche, Bruno |
collection | PubMed |
description | The problem size effect is a well-established finding in arithmetic problem solving and is characterized by worse performance in problems with larger compared to smaller operand size. Solving small and large arithmetic problems has also been shown to involve different cognitive processes and distinct electroencephalography (EEG) oscillations over the left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC). In this study, we aimed to provide further evidence for these dissociations by using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Participants underwent anodal (30min, 1.5 mA, LPPC) and sham tDCS. After the stimulation, we recorded their neural activity using EEG while the participants solved small and large arithmetic problems. We found that the tDCS effects on performance and oscillatory activity critically depended on the problem size. While anodal tDCS improved response latencies in large arithmetic problems, it decreased solution rates in small arithmetic problems. Likewise, the lower-alpha desynchronization in large problems increased, whereas the theta synchronization in small problems decreased. These findings reveal that the LPPC is differentially involved in solving small and large arithmetic problems and demonstrate that the effects of brain stimulation strikingly differ depending on the involved neuro-cognitive processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4366159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43661592015-03-23 When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations Rütsche, Bruno Hauser, Tobias U. Jäncke, Lutz Grabner, Roland H. PLoS One Research Article The problem size effect is a well-established finding in arithmetic problem solving and is characterized by worse performance in problems with larger compared to smaller operand size. Solving small and large arithmetic problems has also been shown to involve different cognitive processes and distinct electroencephalography (EEG) oscillations over the left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC). In this study, we aimed to provide further evidence for these dissociations by using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Participants underwent anodal (30min, 1.5 mA, LPPC) and sham tDCS. After the stimulation, we recorded their neural activity using EEG while the participants solved small and large arithmetic problems. We found that the tDCS effects on performance and oscillatory activity critically depended on the problem size. While anodal tDCS improved response latencies in large arithmetic problems, it decreased solution rates in small arithmetic problems. Likewise, the lower-alpha desynchronization in large problems increased, whereas the theta synchronization in small problems decreased. These findings reveal that the LPPC is differentially involved in solving small and large arithmetic problems and demonstrate that the effects of brain stimulation strikingly differ depending on the involved neuro-cognitive processes. Public Library of Science 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4366159/ /pubmed/25789486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120665 Text en © 2015 Rütsche et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rütsche, Bruno Hauser, Tobias U. Jäncke, Lutz Grabner, Roland H. When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations |
title | When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations |
title_full | When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations |
title_fullStr | When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations |
title_full_unstemmed | When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations |
title_short | When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations |
title_sort | when problem size matters: differential effects of brain stimulation on arithmetic problem solving and neural oscillations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rutschebruno whenproblemsizemattersdifferentialeffectsofbrainstimulationonarithmeticproblemsolvingandneuraloscillations AT hausertobiasu whenproblemsizemattersdifferentialeffectsofbrainstimulationonarithmeticproblemsolvingandneuraloscillations AT janckelutz whenproblemsizemattersdifferentialeffectsofbrainstimulationonarithmeticproblemsolvingandneuraloscillations AT grabnerrolandh whenproblemsizemattersdifferentialeffectsofbrainstimulationonarithmeticproblemsolvingandneuraloscillations |