Cargando…

When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations

The problem size effect is a well-established finding in arithmetic problem solving and is characterized by worse performance in problems with larger compared to smaller operand size. Solving small and large arithmetic problems has also been shown to involve different cognitive processes and distinc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rütsche, Bruno, Hauser, Tobias U., Jäncke, Lutz, Grabner, Roland H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120665
_version_ 1782362325720760320
author Rütsche, Bruno
Hauser, Tobias U.
Jäncke, Lutz
Grabner, Roland H.
author_facet Rütsche, Bruno
Hauser, Tobias U.
Jäncke, Lutz
Grabner, Roland H.
author_sort Rütsche, Bruno
collection PubMed
description The problem size effect is a well-established finding in arithmetic problem solving and is characterized by worse performance in problems with larger compared to smaller operand size. Solving small and large arithmetic problems has also been shown to involve different cognitive processes and distinct electroencephalography (EEG) oscillations over the left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC). In this study, we aimed to provide further evidence for these dissociations by using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Participants underwent anodal (30min, 1.5 mA, LPPC) and sham tDCS. After the stimulation, we recorded their neural activity using EEG while the participants solved small and large arithmetic problems. We found that the tDCS effects on performance and oscillatory activity critically depended on the problem size. While anodal tDCS improved response latencies in large arithmetic problems, it decreased solution rates in small arithmetic problems. Likewise, the lower-alpha desynchronization in large problems increased, whereas the theta synchronization in small problems decreased. These findings reveal that the LPPC is differentially involved in solving small and large arithmetic problems and demonstrate that the effects of brain stimulation strikingly differ depending on the involved neuro-cognitive processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4366159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43661592015-03-23 When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations Rütsche, Bruno Hauser, Tobias U. Jäncke, Lutz Grabner, Roland H. PLoS One Research Article The problem size effect is a well-established finding in arithmetic problem solving and is characterized by worse performance in problems with larger compared to smaller operand size. Solving small and large arithmetic problems has also been shown to involve different cognitive processes and distinct electroencephalography (EEG) oscillations over the left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC). In this study, we aimed to provide further evidence for these dissociations by using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Participants underwent anodal (30min, 1.5 mA, LPPC) and sham tDCS. After the stimulation, we recorded their neural activity using EEG while the participants solved small and large arithmetic problems. We found that the tDCS effects on performance and oscillatory activity critically depended on the problem size. While anodal tDCS improved response latencies in large arithmetic problems, it decreased solution rates in small arithmetic problems. Likewise, the lower-alpha desynchronization in large problems increased, whereas the theta synchronization in small problems decreased. These findings reveal that the LPPC is differentially involved in solving small and large arithmetic problems and demonstrate that the effects of brain stimulation strikingly differ depending on the involved neuro-cognitive processes. Public Library of Science 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4366159/ /pubmed/25789486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120665 Text en © 2015 Rütsche et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rütsche, Bruno
Hauser, Tobias U.
Jäncke, Lutz
Grabner, Roland H.
When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations
title When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations
title_full When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations
title_fullStr When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations
title_full_unstemmed When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations
title_short When Problem Size Matters: Differential Effects of Brain Stimulation on Arithmetic Problem Solving and Neural Oscillations
title_sort when problem size matters: differential effects of brain stimulation on arithmetic problem solving and neural oscillations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120665
work_keys_str_mv AT rutschebruno whenproblemsizemattersdifferentialeffectsofbrainstimulationonarithmeticproblemsolvingandneuraloscillations
AT hausertobiasu whenproblemsizemattersdifferentialeffectsofbrainstimulationonarithmeticproblemsolvingandneuraloscillations
AT janckelutz whenproblemsizemattersdifferentialeffectsofbrainstimulationonarithmeticproblemsolvingandneuraloscillations
AT grabnerrolandh whenproblemsizemattersdifferentialeffectsofbrainstimulationonarithmeticproblemsolvingandneuraloscillations