Cargando…

Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance

Process evaluation is an essential part of designing and testing complex interventions. New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Moore, Graham F, Audrey, Suzanne, Barker, Mary, Bond, Lyndal, Bonell, Chris, Hardeman, Wendy, Moore, Laurence, O’Cathain, Alicia, Tinati, Tannaze, Wight, Daniel, Baird, Janis
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:	Research Methods & Reporting
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25791983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258

Ejemplares similares

Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance
por: Moore, Graham, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Adapting interventions to new contexts—the ADAPT guidance
por: Moore, Graham, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance
por: Skivington, Kathryn, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

When and how do ‘effective’ interventions need to be adapted and/or re-evaluated in new contexts? The need for guidance
por: Evans, Rhiannon E, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The effect of a behaviour change intervention on the diets and physical activity levels of women attending Sure Start Children’s Centres: results from a complex public health intervention
por: Baird, Janis, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Southampton PRegnancy Intervention for the Next Generation (SPRING): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Baird, Janis, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers
por: O’Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Translating Developmental Origins: Improving the Health of Women and Their Children Using a Sustainable Approach to Behaviour Change
por: Barker, Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review
por: O'Cathain, A, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
por: Craig, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance
por: Movsisyan, A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials
por: Richards, David A, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study
por: Duncan, Edward, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Are randomised controlled trials positivist? Reviewing the social science and philosophy literature to assess positivist tendencies of trials of social interventions in public health and health services
por: Bonell, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Realist complex intervention science: Applying realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions
por: Fletcher, Adam, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The acceptability of alcohol intoxication management services to users: A mixed methods study
por: Irving, Andy, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

"Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research?
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Understanding the Development of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol in Scotland: A Qualitative Study of the Policy Process
por: Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Exploratory studies to inform full-scale evaluations of complex public health interventions: the need for guidance
por: Moore, Laurence, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: a qualitative study
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Measuring quality of life in mental health: Are we asking the right questions?
por: Connell, Janice, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

How do third sector organisations or charities providing health and well-being services in England implement patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)? A qualitative interview study
por: Foster, Alexis, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Socioeconomic disparities in access to intensive insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study of patient and healthcare professional perspectives
por: Scott, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Exploratory studies to decide whether and how to proceed with full-scale evaluations of public health interventions: a systematic review of guidance
por: Hallingberg, Britt, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Implementing street triage: a qualitative study of collaboration between police and mental health services
por: Horspool, Kimberley, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Exploring variation in how ambulance services address non-conveyance: a qualitative interview study
por: Knowles, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Health literacy levels of British adults: a cross-sectional survey using two domains of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
por: Simpson, Rebecca M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Exploring the effect of changes to service provision on the use of unscheduled care in England: population surveys
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Acceptability of NHS 111 the telephone service for urgent health care: cross sectional postal survey of users’ views
por: O’Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Qualitative methods and patient and public involvement in trials: opportunities and pitfalls
por: Hoddinott, Pat, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Why do ambulance services have different non-transport rates? A national cross sectional study
por: O’Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality, morbidity and diabetes management for adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review
por: Scott, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

‘Clinically unnecessary’ use of emergency and urgent care: A realist review of patients' decision making
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Tendency to call an ambulance or attend an emergency department for minor or non-urgent problems: a vignette-based population survey in Britain
por: O'Cathain, Alicia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review
por: Grindell, Cheryl, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Child Guidance Council and the Commonwealth Fund
por: Fox, Evelyn
Publicado: (1927)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_vrqr1q0go6kgp97i6mps0asnsu