Cargando…

Reliability and Responsiveness of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Fatigued Persons with Multiple Sclerosis and Low to Mild Disability

BACKGROUND: Peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)peak) via cardiopulmonary exercise testing is considered the gold standard for testing aerobic capacity in healthy participants and people with various medical conditions. The reliability and responsiveness of cardiopulmonary exercise testing outcomes in persons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heine, Martin, van den Akker, Lizanne Eva, Verschuren, Olaf, Visser-Meily, Anne, Kwakkel, Gert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122260
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)peak) via cardiopulmonary exercise testing is considered the gold standard for testing aerobic capacity in healthy participants and people with various medical conditions. The reliability and responsiveness of cardiopulmonary exercise testing outcomes in persons with MS (PwMS) have not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE: (1) to investigate the reliability of cardiopulmonary exercise parameters in PwMS; (2) to determine the responsiveness, in terms of the smallest detectable change (SDC), for each parameter. DESIGN: Two repeated measurements of cardiopulmonary exercise outcomes were obtained, with a median time interval of 16 days. METHODS: Thirty-two PwMS suffering from subjective fatigue performed cardiopulmonary exercise tests on a cycle ergometer, to voluntary exhaustion. We calculated the reliability, in terms of the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC [2,k]; absolute agreement), and the measurement error, in terms of standard error of measurement (SEM) and SDC at individual (SDC(individual)) and group level (SDC(group)). RESULTS: The ICC for VO(2)peak was 0.951, with an SEM of 0.131 L∙min(−1) and an SDC(individual) of 0.364 L∙min(−1). When corrected for bodyweight, the ICC of VO(2)peak was 0.933, with an SEM of 1.7 mL∙kg(−1)∙min(−1) and in an SDC(individual) of 4.6 mL∙kg(−1)∙min(−1). LIMITATIONS: Generalization of our study results is restricted to fatigued PwMS with a low to mild level of disability. CONCLUSIONS: At individual level, cardiopulmonary exercise testing can be used reliably to assess physical fitness in terms of VO(2)peak, but less so to determine significant changes. At group level, VO(2)peak can be reliably used to determine physical fitness status and establish change over time.