Cargando…

Determination of Foraging Thresholds and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl

Energetic carrying capacity of habitats for wildlife is a fundamental concept used to better understand population ecology and prioritize conservation efforts. However, carrying capacity can be difficult to estimate accurately and simplified models often depend on many assumptions and few estimated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagy, Heath M., Kaminski, Richard M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25790255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118349
_version_ 1782362346896752640
author Hagy, Heath M.
Kaminski, Richard M.
author_facet Hagy, Heath M.
Kaminski, Richard M.
author_sort Hagy, Heath M.
collection PubMed
description Energetic carrying capacity of habitats for wildlife is a fundamental concept used to better understand population ecology and prioritize conservation efforts. However, carrying capacity can be difficult to estimate accurately and simplified models often depend on many assumptions and few estimated parameters. We demonstrate the complex nature of parameterizing energetic carrying capacity models and use an experimental approach to describe a necessary parameter, a foraging threshold (i.e., density of food at which animals no longer can efficiently forage and acquire energy), for a guild of migratory birds. We created foraging patches with different fixed prey densities and monitored the numerical and behavioral responses of waterfowl (Anatidae) and depletion of foods during winter. Dabbling ducks (Anatini) fed extensively in plots and all initial densities of supplemented seed were rapidly reduced to 10 kg/ha and other natural seeds and tubers combined to 170 kg/ha, despite different starting densities. However, ducks did not abandon or stop foraging in wetlands when seed reduction ceased approximately two weeks into the winter-long experiment nor did they consistently distribute according to ideal-free predictions during this period. Dabbling duck use of experimental plots was not related to initial seed density, and residual seed and tuber densities varied among plant taxa and wetlands but not plots. Herein, we reached several conclusions: 1) foraging effort and numerical responses of dabbling ducks in winter were likely influenced by factors other than total food densities (e.g., predation risk, opportunity costs, forager condition), 2) foraging thresholds may vary among foraging locations, and 3) the numerical response of dabbling ducks may be an inconsistent predictor of habitat quality relative to seed and tuber density. We describe implications on habitat conservation objectives of using different foraging thresholds in energetic carrying capacity models and suggest scientists reevaluate assumptions of these models used to guide habitat conservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4366255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43662552015-03-23 Determination of Foraging Thresholds and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl Hagy, Heath M. Kaminski, Richard M. PLoS One Research Article Energetic carrying capacity of habitats for wildlife is a fundamental concept used to better understand population ecology and prioritize conservation efforts. However, carrying capacity can be difficult to estimate accurately and simplified models often depend on many assumptions and few estimated parameters. We demonstrate the complex nature of parameterizing energetic carrying capacity models and use an experimental approach to describe a necessary parameter, a foraging threshold (i.e., density of food at which animals no longer can efficiently forage and acquire energy), for a guild of migratory birds. We created foraging patches with different fixed prey densities and monitored the numerical and behavioral responses of waterfowl (Anatidae) and depletion of foods during winter. Dabbling ducks (Anatini) fed extensively in plots and all initial densities of supplemented seed were rapidly reduced to 10 kg/ha and other natural seeds and tubers combined to 170 kg/ha, despite different starting densities. However, ducks did not abandon or stop foraging in wetlands when seed reduction ceased approximately two weeks into the winter-long experiment nor did they consistently distribute according to ideal-free predictions during this period. Dabbling duck use of experimental plots was not related to initial seed density, and residual seed and tuber densities varied among plant taxa and wetlands but not plots. Herein, we reached several conclusions: 1) foraging effort and numerical responses of dabbling ducks in winter were likely influenced by factors other than total food densities (e.g., predation risk, opportunity costs, forager condition), 2) foraging thresholds may vary among foraging locations, and 3) the numerical response of dabbling ducks may be an inconsistent predictor of habitat quality relative to seed and tuber density. We describe implications on habitat conservation objectives of using different foraging thresholds in energetic carrying capacity models and suggest scientists reevaluate assumptions of these models used to guide habitat conservation. Public Library of Science 2015-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4366255/ /pubmed/25790255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118349 Text en © 2015 Hagy, Kaminski http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hagy, Heath M.
Kaminski, Richard M.
Determination of Foraging Thresholds and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl
title Determination of Foraging Thresholds and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl
title_full Determination of Foraging Thresholds and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl
title_fullStr Determination of Foraging Thresholds and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl
title_full_unstemmed Determination of Foraging Thresholds and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl
title_short Determination of Foraging Thresholds and Effects of Application on Energetic Carrying Capacity for Waterfowl
title_sort determination of foraging thresholds and effects of application on energetic carrying capacity for waterfowl
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25790255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118349
work_keys_str_mv AT hagyheathm determinationofforagingthresholdsandeffectsofapplicationonenergeticcarryingcapacityforwaterfowl
AT kaminskirichardm determinationofforagingthresholdsandeffectsofapplicationonenergeticcarryingcapacityforwaterfowl