Cargando…
Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?
BACKGROUND: Peer evaluation is the cornerstone of science evaluation. In this paper, we analyze whether or not a form of peer evaluation, the pre-publication selection of the best papers in Computer Science (CS) conferences, is better than random, when considering future citations received by the pa...
Autores principales: | Wainer, Jacques, Eckmann, Michael, Rocha, Anderson |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4366404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118446 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Good! Is it the best???
por: Selvarajan, Sandhiya, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Pharmaceuticals Best Paper Award 2015
por: Vanden Eynde, Jean Jacques
Publicado: (2015) -
Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network
por: Lee, Christopher
Publicado: (2012) -
Best paper and the best reviewer of IJU
por: Kekre, Nitin S.
Publicado: (2010) -
Reply to “Good! is it the best ???
por: Chaturvedi, Aditi, et al.
Publicado: (2013)