Cargando…

Conventional versus digital approach for measuring dentin translucency in forensic age estimation

BACKGROUND: Root dentine translucency remains the method of choice providing the most accurate results for age estimation. Conventionally, translucency is measured using calipers. In recent times, computer-based methods are proposed, which require the use of custom-built software programs. AIMS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chopra, Varun, Thodasam, Gopal, Ahmad, Zeeshan Heera, Singh, Simranjit, Rajawat, Indresh, Gupta, Sonal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810651
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.149112
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Root dentine translucency remains the method of choice providing the most accurate results for age estimation. Conventionally, translucency is measured using calipers. In recent times, computer-based methods are proposed, which require the use of custom-built software programs. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to use a digital method to measure dentinal translucency on sectioned teeth and to compare digital measurements to conventionally obtained translucency measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 extracted permanent teeth were collected and were sectioned to a thickness of 250 μm. Translucency measurements were obtained using the digital method and compared with those obtained using a caliper. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients of translucency measurements to age were statistically significant for both methods (P < 0.001), although marginally higher correlation was observed for the conventional method (r = 0.612). Application of derived linear regression equations on an independent sample (n = 25) suggested that conventional approach is marginally better in estimating age to within 5 years of the actual age, both the methods are similar in assessing age within 5-10 years of the actual age, and digital approach is marginally better in estimating age beyond 10 years of actual age. CONCLUSION: The translucency measurements obtained by the two methods were identical, with no clear superiority of one method over the other.