Cargando…
Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional?
Subepithelial lesions (SEL) are identified during endoscopic procedures on a regular basis. They can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and are located beneath the normal epithelial layer, which explains why a tissue diagnosis is difficult to obtain with routine biopsies. Endoscopic u...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25830949 |
_version_ | 1782362502067126272 |
---|---|
author | Eckardt, Alexander J. Jenssen, Christian |
author_facet | Eckardt, Alexander J. Jenssen, Christian |
author_sort | Eckardt, Alexander J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Subepithelial lesions (SEL) are identified during endoscopic procedures on a regular basis. They can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and are located beneath the normal epithelial layer, which explains why a tissue diagnosis is difficult to obtain with routine biopsies. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used to further characterize these lesions. EUS can distinguish intramural lesion from extramural compression. Furthermore, it allows allocation of intramural lesions to a specific layer of the GI wall and offers additional information as to whether a lesion could be benign or malignant. EUS also assists in choosing the optimal means of tissue acquisition. The choice of tissue acquisition is based on a number of factors, such as tumor size, EUS features, and location within the GI tract or within a specific layer of the GI wall. Furthermore, local expertise and patient factors should be considered when deciding whether tissue acquisition, surgical intervention or follow up is recommended. In this review we offer an EUS-guided approach to the evaluation of incidental SEL based on current evidence and point out areas of uncertainty, which explain why the proposed algorithmic approach may be optional rather than optimal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4367205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43672052015-04-01 Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional? Eckardt, Alexander J. Jenssen, Christian Ann Gastroenterol Invited Review Subepithelial lesions (SEL) are identified during endoscopic procedures on a regular basis. They can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and are located beneath the normal epithelial layer, which explains why a tissue diagnosis is difficult to obtain with routine biopsies. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used to further characterize these lesions. EUS can distinguish intramural lesion from extramural compression. Furthermore, it allows allocation of intramural lesions to a specific layer of the GI wall and offers additional information as to whether a lesion could be benign or malignant. EUS also assists in choosing the optimal means of tissue acquisition. The choice of tissue acquisition is based on a number of factors, such as tumor size, EUS features, and location within the GI tract or within a specific layer of the GI wall. Furthermore, local expertise and patient factors should be considered when deciding whether tissue acquisition, surgical intervention or follow up is recommended. In this review we offer an EUS-guided approach to the evaluation of incidental SEL based on current evidence and point out areas of uncertainty, which explain why the proposed algorithmic approach may be optional rather than optimal. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4367205/ /pubmed/25830949 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Eckardt, Alexander J. Jenssen, Christian Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional? |
title | Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional? |
title_full | Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional? |
title_fullStr | Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional? |
title_full_unstemmed | Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional? |
title_short | Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional? |
title_sort | current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional? |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25830949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eckardtalexanderj currentendoscopicultrasoundguidedapproachtoincidentalsubepitheliallesionsoptimaloroptional AT jenssenchristian currentendoscopicultrasoundguidedapproachtoincidentalsubepitheliallesionsoptimaloroptional |